F
Fone_Bone_2001
Guest
I don’t like vagueness about morality, either. We also, however, have to be consistent and rational in how we apply moral norms. The depiction of evil isn’t necessarily immoral itself… I truly think that what matters is how evil is portrayed.I prefer Church Authority. I am tired of the vagueness that permeates ideas about right and wrong. We live in a culture where what was Rated R 10 years ago is now, what? PG-13?
Peace,
Ed
In terms of secular MPAA ratings, I’ll grant you that they might be something to pay attention to, as at the very least, consistent standards govern those ratings.
Still, I honestly don’t care what a movie is rated or how that has shifted, since those ratings themselves don’t automatically reflect the reasons behind them.
For instance, a movie might be rated R for violence alone. Or for sexual content alone. Or even for language alone. Frost/Nixon, a great film with absolutely no violence or sexual content depicted, is rated R simply because the “f” word is used more than once.
PG-13 is no more consistent: maybe it’s rated PG-13 because of Lord of the Rings-style action alone. Or maybe it’s some kind of comedy replete with sexual references, nudity, drug references, etc. You just don’t know. To use those ratings well, you have to look up the reason they were given.
Because of that, I just cut out the middle man and go straight to that website I linked to that will tell me the content without applying arbitrarily age-based ratings.