M
MH84
Guest
Has anyone else noticed in the RSV why in the Old Testament the LORD is referred to as “Thy” and in the New Testment Jesus is referred to as “You” just like other people in the Bible?
I haven’t read the RSV, but I have noticed different usages of thy and you in the KJV. I asked my English prof about it, and he said it was just stylistic.Has anyone else noticed in the RSV why in the Old Testament the LORD is referred to as “Thy” and in the New Testment Jesus is referred to as “You” just like other people in the Bible?
Did you ask your prof about the RSV or the KJV? “Stylistic” might describe the inconsistent usage in the RSV, but style isn’t a consideration with the consistent usage in the KJV. It, like the Douay-Rheims, simply uses the old form “thou” (thy, thee, thine) for the second person singular. The second person plural is “you”. The beauty of this older usage is elimination of confusion. When “you” appears in these bibles it is always understood as plural. Conversely, consider Matthew 16:19 in the NAB:I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.I haven’t read the RSV, but I have noticed different usages of thy and you in the KJV. I asked my English prof about it, and he said it was just stylistic.
I find your scenario interesting, because “you” is actually the more formal of the two.
It was the KJV, so maybe he just never noticed it and came up with an answer s best he could…Did you ask your prof about the RSV or the KJV? “Stylistic” might describe the inconsistent usage in the RSV, but style isn’t a consideration with the consistent usage in the KJV.