Millions, thats a bit of an overstatement dont you think?
I wouldn’t say so. The Soviet Union lost 10-12 million soldiers on the Eastern front, and Kaninchen is correct in saying that a large proportion of its armed forces consisted of Muslims from what are now the Central Asian states (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan etc…). If you ever visit the graves of the Stalingrad dead you’ll find Muhammads, Alis and Hussains everywhere.
Indonesia also suffered 4-5 million deaths, 90% of its population is Muslim by the way.
France’s armed forces also consisted of many Algerians, Moroccans and Tunisians from its West African territories (the Goumier), almost all Muslim.
The British army fighting the Japanese in Burma consisted mostly of Indian (and now Pakistani and Bangladeshi) conscripts, many of which were Muslim.
You can also throw in the Palestine regiment; which despite the misleading propaganda in the opening post, fought on the side of the Allies, mostly in Libya against Hitler’s Afrika Korps. The Egyptian navy served under the British and many of its men fought in the Battle of El-Alamein. The Bahrainis under Isa bin Ali Al-Khalifah, Omanis under Taimur ibn Faysal, and the Jordanians under Sayyid Abdullah, all also fought for the British.
Oh and don’t forget the Albanians either, whose country was devasted when the Italian fascists invaded.
Really, anyone who looks at WWII without trying to prove that Muslims are a threat to Western civilisation would see that they were overwhelmingly against the Nazis. In fact the only Muslim country which could be said to be on their side was Turkey, which fittingly enough was under an atheistic government at the time anyway.
No.
Unfortunately bad spelling and grammar do.
Was there any need for that? English clearly isn’t his first language.
