Whoa, slow down there… Jumping to a lot of conclusions, aren’t we? Let’s go point by point…
That does not change the fact that at 17 one drinks alcohol in violation of the law.
No, the drinking age in Canada is irrelevant to the fact that he’s 17 and drinking. All that poster was pointing out is to all the people saying, ‘wait until you’re 21 and legal,’ that he only has to wait until he’s 19 and legal. That post was an aside, not the topic.
I would think that this could (and maybe should) be used as a sign that either the vocation to the religious life is not present or that one has some maturing to do.
Or maybe it’s a sign that he is maturing and he is taking his discernment and calling seriously. Remember, he didn’t come here to say he plans to drink no matter what the law says. He came here to admit that he’s done it in the past, and isn’t sure that he should continue. Sounds like he’s realizing that breaking civil law is wrong in this situation, and was looking for advice on/confirmation of his suspicions.
If one would casually disregard a civil law to socialize (and one can assume that this is done to “feel good”) then why should it be believed that one would keep all the vows, promises, and laws that are a part of religioius life especailly when some of them involve personal sacrifice and are not of the “feel good” sort.
This paragraph was a bit much… Number one, you cannot assume he or anyone else drinks to ‘feel good’. Some do, absolutely, but that’s not the situation Caesar described. He’s talking about high school, parties, and ‘fitting in’, a much different situation. Sounds more like he drinks because, “I don’t want to stand out or become an outcast,” rather than, “I’m trying to feel good.” To assume that anyone who drinks is doing it to “feel good” or any other reason is a big assumption.
Number two, it’s a big jump to say, “Since you haven’t followed this civil law,” then, “how can we believe you will ever live up to your vows?” You’re comparing apples and oranges here. There are many civil laws which, while they exist for a purpose, are routinely broken or ignored or forgetten for many different reasons. By this logic, anyone who has ever sped 5 miles over the limit, jaywalked, crossed against the light, taken home a pen from work, or whatever, could never be trusted to live up to any promise or vow. So that takes care of just about everyone… It’s ridiculous to compare not following a minor civil law (no matter how necessary or appropriate it is) with not living up to a lifetime promise to God.