S
Spirithound
Guest
Many are the proponents of women’s ordination, because they see women physically and mentally doing the same jobs as men in other sectors of society.
Another (partially overlapping) group says that the host does not become the Body and Blood of our Lord because they see no difference.
Another group is dedicated to “chipping away” at the list of natural phenomena supposedly done by God, thus “proving” He doesn’t exist.
There is a current thread in Philosophy forum on the mind/brain dichotomy that I suspect is suffering from a similar mistake.
Here is my question: What is/are the proper tool(s) to use when making conclusions in the realm of religion?
Another (partially overlapping) group says that the host does not become the Body and Blood of our Lord because they see no difference.
Another group is dedicated to “chipping away” at the list of natural phenomena supposedly done by God, thus “proving” He doesn’t exist.
There is a current thread in Philosophy forum on the mind/brain dichotomy that I suspect is suffering from a similar mistake.
Here is my question: What is/are the proper tool(s) to use when making conclusions in the realm of religion?