Proposal: Catholic Discipline for Commenting Online

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elijah_Baley
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

Elijah_Baley

Guest
WHEREAS commenting online may be injurious to maintaining a state of grace, as it may increase occasions or near occasions of pride, wrath, or sloth, as well as other sins; and

WHEREAS this selfsame practice is yet potentially an excellent tool for engaging hearts and minds, which is itself essential for planting seeds for the Holy Ghost; and

WHEREAS Catholics are not Amish; and

WHEREAS we must evangelize all nations, even those whose inhabitants spend a great deal of time online; and

WHEREAS a “bitter zeal” connotes no wisdom but is “earthly, sensual, devilish,” leading to “inconstancy, and every evil work,” (James 3); and

WHEREAS our “adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, goeth about seeking whom he may devour,” we must “be sober and watch” (1 Peter 5); and

WHEREAS it may be deemed helpful to establish rules or method which will cut down the occasions of sin while optimizing planting good seeds; and

WHEREAS it is a cause of grave scandal to non-believers for a Catholic to spout nonsense, for even non-believers can know certain truths; and

WHEREAS it is a cause of grave scandal to Catholics if a Catholic begin to spout nonsense, for Catholics worship Truth Incarnate; and

WHEREAS that a publicly identifiable discipline may be helpful to expedite fraternal correction, which itself may help constancy in technique and prevent the errors listed above; and

WHEREAS any discipline adopted by more than one person should be submitted first for feedback and approval among the others;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that before such a list of rules for Catholics commenting online be proposed for adoption, a draft of rules shall be to be appended to this most solemn declaration, submitted to a community for dissection and feedback, for a period of no less than one week, nor less than is deemed necessary by the community-at-large.

PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE RIGHT HON. COMMENTER ELIJAH BALEY FOR PUBLIC DISPLAY IN THE FORUM OF CATHOLIC.COM, EVEN AS HIS ALTER EGO THEUBIQUITOUS POSTS A PARALLEL THREAD ON PHATMASS.COM, THIS TUESDAY THE 28TH OF AUGUST, IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD TWO-THOUSAND TWELVE. AS PROCLAIMED ABOVE, HENCEFORWARD ARE THE RULES PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION:

  1. *]Self-deprecation may be necessary. Practice.
    *]Except when provided above, never use first-person personal pronouns. (I, we, my, me, our, &c.) Avoid second-person personal pronouns. (You, your, &c.)
    *]Before submitting your comment, examine your conscience carefully. Always listen to it and obey it, even when your comment seems innocuous.
    *]If rebuking someone else, write it as a rebuke to yourself as well (cf. Matthew 7).
    *]Look it up. Use links.
    *]If you can’t prove what you say, but it is necessary to say, admit as much. Ask for help finding a source.
    *]Rarely does someone write so badly that you can’t figure out what he means. Otherwise, never respond to tone or grammatical errors.
    *]Write well, and concisely.
    *]If your conscience bears a mortal sin, never continue an argument.
    *]Always read what is written, avoiding quick replies. If necessary, outline long comments.
    *]Writing truth in charity may require a stern voice. May.
    *]Winning is not the bull’s-eye. Mutually understanding truth is the bull’s-eye.
 
WHEREAS commenting online may be injurious to maintaining a state of grace, as it may increase occasions or near occasions of pride, wrath, or sloth, as well as other sins; and

WHEREAS this selfsame practice is yet potentially an excellent tool for engaging hearts and minds, which is itself essential for planting seeds for the Holy Ghost; and

WHEREAS Catholics are not Amish; and

WHEREAS we must evangelize all nations, even those whose inhabitants spend a great deal of time online; and

WHEREAS a “bitter zeal” connotes no wisdom but is “earthly, sensual, devilish,” leading to “inconstancy, and every evil work,” (James 3); and

WHEREAS our “adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, goeth about seeking whom he may devour,” we must “be sober and watch” (1 Peter 5); and

WHEREAS it may be deemed helpful to establish rules or method which will cut down the occasions of sin while optimizing planting good seeds; and

WHEREAS it is a cause of grave scandal to non-believers for a Catholic to spout nonsense, for even non-believers can know certain truths; and

WHEREAS it is a cause of grave scandal to Catholics if a Catholic begin to spout nonsense, for Catholics worship Truth Incarnate; and

WHEREAS that a publicly identifiable discipline may be helpful to expedite fraternal correction, which itself may help constancy in technique and prevent the errors listed above; and

WHEREAS any discipline adopted by more than one person should be submitted first for feedback and approval among the others;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that before such a list of rules for Catholics commenting online be proposed for adoption, a draft of rules shall be to be appended to this most solemn declaration, submitted to a community for dissection and feedback, for a period of no less than one week, nor less than is deemed necessary by the community-at-large.

PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE RIGHT HON. COMMENTER ELIJAH BALEY FOR PUBLIC DISPLAY IN THE FORUM OF CATHOLIC.COM, EVEN AS HIS ALTER EGO THEUBIQUITOUS POSTS A PARALLEL THREAD ON PHATMASS.COM, THIS TUESDAY THE 28TH OF AUGUST, IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD TWO-THOUSAND TWELVE. AS PROCLAIMED ABOVE, HENCEFORWARD ARE THE RULES PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION:

  1. *]Self-deprecation may be necessary. Practice.
    *]Except when provided above, never use first-person personal pronouns. (I, we, my, me, our, &c.) Avoid second-person personal pronouns. (You, your, &c.)
    *]Before submitting your comment, examine your conscience carefully. Always listen to it and obey it, even when your comment seems innocuous.
    *]If rebuking someone else, write it as a rebuke to yourself as well (cf. Matthew 7).
    *]Look it up. Use links.
    *]If you can’t prove what you say, but it is necessary to say, admit as much. Ask for help finding a source.
    *]Rarely does someone write so badly that you can’t figure out what he means. Otherwise, never respond to tone or grammatical errors.
    *]Write well, and concisely.
    *]If your conscience bears a mortal sin, never continue an argument.
    *]Always read what is written, avoiding quick replies. If necessary, outline long comments.
    *]Writing truth in charity may require a stern voice. May.
    *]Winning is not the bull’s-eye. Mutually understanding truth is the bull’s-eye.

  1. So, just who gets to interpret this very “nice” legislation? Sounds pretty unconstitutional to me. But it is very “nice”.

    Video - The church of “nice”.
 
There actually was a tongue in cheek “Litany for the Conversion of Internet Thugs” on Father Z’s blog about a year ago. Wish I remembered the link, but it was arranged as a traditional litany. He did specify it was for private use only. But it was actually pretty funny.
 
So, just who gets to interpret this very “nice” legislation? Sounds pretty unconstitutional to me. But it is very “nice”.
Friend, where does this comment come from?
There actually was a tongue in cheek “Litany for the Conversion of Internet Thugs” on Father Z’s blog about a year ago. Wish I remembered the link, but it was arranged as a traditional litany. He did specify it was for private use only. But it was actually pretty funny.
Fr. Z reposted it recently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top