S
scriabin
Guest
Why don’t our logical, measured answers to Protestant objections work?
Yes, Catholic Answers are essential in giving a sound, straightforward defense of the truth; but I have convinced others with my witness only when they have been open; if they have been *closed * to Catholicism, no amount of Scripture, history, or logic will influence people, it seems.
How can you fight prejudice?
Overcome ignorance?
How can you change people’s attitudes?
This isn’t just theology, it’s rhetoric and psychology.
An analogy: You can’t convince a skinny, dying anorexic teenage girl she needs to eat by *reasoning * with her. You can’t show her a picture of her condition as proof–she still looks “fat” to herself. Something inside her head is blocking reality.
In a similar way, we can’t reason with certain people; because it’s not a matter of reason or thought—it’s emotion, bias, and feelings.
So my question (finally)
On the surface, it looks as if we’re discussing theology and scripture; but underneath isn’t it oftentimes something else?
Yes, Catholic Answers are essential in giving a sound, straightforward defense of the truth; but I have convinced others with my witness only when they have been open; if they have been *closed * to Catholicism, no amount of Scripture, history, or logic will influence people, it seems.
How can you fight prejudice?
Overcome ignorance?
How can you change people’s attitudes?
This isn’t just theology, it’s rhetoric and psychology.
An analogy: You can’t convince a skinny, dying anorexic teenage girl she needs to eat by *reasoning * with her. You can’t show her a picture of her condition as proof–she still looks “fat” to herself. Something inside her head is blocking reality.
In a similar way, we can’t reason with certain people; because it’s not a matter of reason or thought—it’s emotion, bias, and feelings.
So my question (finally)
On the surface, it looks as if we’re discussing theology and scripture; but underneath isn’t it oftentimes something else?