Protestant Bible Study of the Old Testament Tabernacle

  • Thread starter Thread starter modakota
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

modakota

Guest
I entered the Catholic Church at Easter Vigil. I am doing a protestant bible study with 2 of my Baptist friends and want to introduce Catholic teaching on the subject of the Old Testament tabernacle. Anyone know any good books to guide me?
 
Scott Hahn has a complete course on Bible study called Understanding the Scriptures. It comes in one large volume and is jam-packed with so much good information and an easily read and understandable presentation. In Chapter 8, The Law, page 155 discusses the Tabernacle specifically. He has lots of good books and CDs too.

One question, why a Protestant Bible study?? Just curious…
 
I entered the Catholic Church at Easter Vigil. I am doing a protestant bible study with 2 of my Baptist friends and want to introduce Catholic teaching on the subject of the Old Testament tabernacle. Anyone know any good books to guide me?
I would think the Bible itself is sufficient.
 
Diggerdomer, I agree. If they have any questions, they could each go to their respective churches for clarification.
 
Diggerdomer, I agree. If they have any questions, they could each go to their respective churches for clarification.
Your and “Digger’s” comments seem pretty sarcastic. I know this person and she is in love with her new Catholic faith and the Eucharist and is only doing the protestant bible study with these particular friends, who are still protestant. They have been doing bible study for many years and are very close friends. My friend has done a phenomenal job of sharing her faith and has begun to meet some resistance from them.

Her wise strategy has been to continue their friendship and a bible study in order to deal with these women where they are but to, as she said in her original post, infuse Catholic teaching into this bible study. This is the essence of evangelization. I am VERY proud of her and she is doing exactly the right thing with these friends.

Though they were subtle, I don’t think your comments were kind or fair. She is NOT a sola scriptura person. You both could check the seemingly snide comments and actually try to help with her very sincere question.
 
I did a study of the Tabernacle and I am having a hard time figuring how a Catholic view would differ from a protestant view on the subject. The only part in the study I did that could be a problem would be the protestant version of the veil of the temple being ripped at the time of Jesus’ death. Protestants view this as a symbol that it was now possible to approach God without the need of a priest to intercede and sometimes use that as a tool to attack the priesthood of the Church as not needed. The rest is quite cool. If you make it too much of a project you might miss out on a very good study.
 
Your and “Digger’s” comments seem pretty sarcastic. I know this person and she is in love with her new Catholic faith and the Eucharist and is only doing the protestant bible study with these particular friends, who are still protestant. They have been doing bible study for many years and are very close friends. My friend has done a phenomenal job of sharing her faith and has begun to meet some resistance from them.

Her wise strategy has been to continue their friendship and a bible study in order to deal with these women where they are but to, as she said in her original post, infuse Catholic teaching into this bible study. This is the essence of evangelization. I am VERY proud of her and she is doing exactly the right thing with these friends.

Though they were subtle, I don’t think your comments were kind or fair. She is NOT a sola scriptura person. You both could check the seemingly snide comments and actually try to help with her very sincere question.
I was not trying to be sarcastic. Sorry if it came across that way. I was sincere in what I said.
 
I would think the Bible itself is sufficient.
And who would be doing the interpreting? Once again, each man becomes the center insead of God. It is certainly not sufficient. The bible is a teaching tool assembled by the Bishops of the Catholic Church in the late 300’s, Jesus Church guides all interpretation through the Holy Spirit. That is why the Church has remained unchanged and unswerving in teaching the Word to all mankind for 2,000 years, unlike the splintering into over 30,000 churches where each man thought that the Bible alone was sufficient. The pride of man has led to his downfall repeatedly, begininning with Adam and Eve. Think about the reason that Jesus came down and took on flesh. He did not write a bible, he taught us how to live and started the Church to guide us since we are incapable of being our own guide without His Church to give us the Bible and interpret it for us.
 
Dearest Skybaum,
It was not my intent to be sarcastic. In fact I still stand by what I said and here is why. She is interpreting the scriptures through a catholic lens in short that perspective. Her friends are doing it through the perspectives of their various churches. Each view is full of grace and quite good. While she can use that time to evangelize, I think its better spent practicing Jesus’s 2nd greatest command. To love one another as you love yourselves.

In short to enjoy praising God through the scriptures together.
 
I did a study of the Tabernacle and I am having a hard time figuring how a Catholic view would differ from a protestant view on the subject. The only part in the study I did that could be a problem would be the protestant version of the veil of the temple being ripped at the time of Jesus’ death. Protestants view this as a symbol that it was now possible to approach God without the need of a priest to intercede and sometimes use that as a tool to attack the priesthood of the Church as not needed. The rest is quite cool. If you make it too much of a project you might miss out on a very good study.
I suspect the main difference would be Catholics seeing a comparison between the Old Testament Tabernacle and Mary. Mary’s perpetual virignity and Immaculate Concpetion tie into the need to keep, like in the Old Testament, the tabernacle purified.
 
I entered the Catholic Church at Easter Vigil. I am doing a protestant bible study with 2 of my Baptist friends and want to introduce Catholic teaching on the subject of the Old Testament tabernacle. Anyone know any good books to guide me?
i just find it fascinating that you were able to retain your friendships with these 2. Praise God. i wish i could say the same. i have one person i was very close to for years. because of my conversion, our friendship became strained. we got to where we could not discuss spiritual things. he kept throwing baptist dogma at me. i think he thinks im lost. gave him some very good books to read. its been a year since ive seen him. since i moved out of the area. but he will not even take my calls. i have a friend who was a baptist preacher and converted to Episcopalian go through the same thing. he lost alot more tho. but now he has his own Church. thank God you were able to retain your friendships. Peace 🙂
 
I suspect the main difference would be Catholics seeing a comparison between the Old Testament Tabernacle and Mary. Mary’s perpetual virignity and Immaculate Concpetion tie into the need to keep, like in the Old Testament, the tabernacle purified.
I didn’t know about that one. Although it is a clear difference I don’t believe there is any protestant teaching of the Tabernacle that would contradict it. That sounds more like a teaching that would compliment the protestant teaching. However, modakota said she wanted to introduce some Catholic teaching, and I don’t think Mary’s perpetual virginity would go over so well. If she wanted to introduce this topic I would recommend getting the protestants on board with the Immaculate Conception and stop there. If she dives right into perpetual virginity they might react against that.

The study I took focused on how the blood of Christ purifies us from our sins and makes it possible for us to come into the presence of God without being struck down. There might be some more Catholic teachings that can be brought into that topic, but I am not sure about that. Most likely modakota would have many opportunities to share about her conversion experience related to her purification. I imagine that might do the most to help her protestant friends feel more at ease about her conversion and might even generate some curiosity. I can’t believe I’m giving pointers to help someone proselytize protestants, but hey, if it works they probably were not that convinced about being protestants to begin with.
 
I didn’t know about that one. Although it is a clear difference I don’t believe there is any protestant teaching of the Tabernacle that would contradict it. That sounds more like a teaching that would compliment the protestant teaching. However, modakota said she wanted to introduce some Catholic teaching, and I don’t think Mary’s perpetual virginity would go over so well. If she wanted to introduce this topic I would recommend getting the protestants on board with the Immaculate Conception and stop there. If she dives right into perpetual virginity they might react against that.

The study I took focused on how the blood of Christ purifies us from our sins and makes it possible for us to come into the presence of God without being struck down. There might be some more Catholic teachings that can be brought into that topic, but I am not sure about that. Most likely modakota would have many opportunities to share about her conversion experience related to her purification. I imagine that might do the most to help her protestant friends feel more at ease about her conversion and might even generate some curiosity. I can’t believe I’m giving pointers to help someone proselytize protestants, but hey, if it works they probably were not that convinced about being protestants to begin with.
im just hoping no friendships are lost over this. my prayer is that the Holy Spirit guides their study. it can be touchy when you get into certain areas. i think the immaculate conception would be harder for them to understand, than the Blessed Mothers perpetual virginity. Peace 🙂
 
im just hoping no friendships are lost over this. my prayer is that the Holy Spirit guides their study. it can be touchy when you get into certain areas. i think the immaculate conception would be harder for them to understand, than the Blessed Mothers perpetual virginity. Peace 🙂
Good point. Maybe then just focus on the virgin birth. We all agree on that. Then she could introduce the teaching and develop it later if she sees an opening. Like said in the second paragraph sharing her personal experiences might prove to be the most beneficial. Nobody can refute her experiences because they are hers and hers alone. I think you are right to warn about friendship. If she pushes too hard they might push back.
 
Good point. Maybe then just focus on the virgin birth. We all agree on that. Then she could introduce the teaching and develop it later if she sees an opening. Like said in the second paragraph sharing her personal experiences might prove to be the most beneficial. Nobody can refute her experiences because they are hers and hers alone. I think you are right to warn about friendship. If she pushes too hard they might push back.
hi texasgringo. i really do think it is wonderful tho that she has been able to retain these relationships. it gives me hope. she is an inspiration for further understanding between Catholics and Baptist. that would be awesome. i really think whats going on there is a work of God. for all parties concerned. Peace 🙂
 
And who would be doing the interpreting? Once again, each man becomes the center insead of God. It is certainly not sufficient. The bible is a teaching tool assembled by the Bishops of the Catholic Church in the late 300’s, Jesus Church guides all interpretation through the Holy Spirit. That is why the Church has remained unchanged and unswerving in teaching the Word to all mankind for 2,000 years, unlike the splintering into over 30,000 churches where each man thought that the Bible alone was sufficient. The pride of man has led to his downfall repeatedly, begininning with Adam and Eve. Think about the reason that Jesus came down and took on flesh. He did not write a bible, he taught us how to live and started the Church to guide us since we are incapable of being our own guide without His Church to give us the Bible and interpret it for us.
The Bible is NOT a “teaching tool” …“assembled by the Bishops of the Catholic Church in the late 300’s.”

It is SO MUCH more than that.

PLEASE!

Read the Catechism para 50-141 to see what the Catholic Church teaches and believes about the Bible.
 
I was speaking in answer to the poster who said that using the Bible alone was sufficient! I certainly know my Catholic faith, but was not speaking to a Catholic about it, but a person who doesn’t understand that him just using a Bible is sufficient to understanding the Word of God. Can you see the difference here?
 
I was speaking in answer to the poster who said that using the Bible alone was sufficient! I certainly know my Catholic faith, but was not speaking to a Catholic about it, but a person who doesn’t understand that him just using a Bible is sufficient to understanding the Word of God. Can you see the difference here?
Yes, I understand that difference, but I still was concerned about how some might interpret your post I responded to. I still think that the first place to start when wondering what the Old Testament meant about “tabernacle” or anything is the Old Testament itself.
 
Yes, I understand that difference, but I still was concerned about how some might interpret your post I responded to. I still think that the first place to start when wondering what the Old Testament meant about “tabernacle” or anything is the Old Testament itself.
I understand what you mean, but my thoughts were that a person who is unfamiliar with the Traditions of our Church explained in the Catechism offered up a simple one sentence response about what supporting texts could be used by the person in interpreting the Bible at her Bible Study saying only, “The Bible itself would be all that was needed.”

Of course we understand that is was by Apostolic Tradition that the Church discerned which writings are to be included in the list of the sacred books (Para 120 CCC). Also, as Para 113 advises us: Read the Scripture within the living Tradition of the whole Church. Thank you for the expansion on that thought! 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top