Protestant Christians: Any problem with sola scriptura?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lenten_ashes
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just a little caveat…Scripture cannot be infallible, being infallible denotes some actions, or incapable of error…

On your last statement…I will add a little caveat too…a SS practicing Christian believes the interpretations given them by their pastors as to what the verses of scripture mean…that is why many cannot agree on what the verses actually mean.
The Scriptures Are incapable of error , they are infallible
 
Just a little caveat…Scripture cannot be infallible, being infallible denotes some actions, or incapable of error…
Because of what Scripture is: it is infallible
On your last statement…I will add a little caveat too…a SS practicing Christian believes the interpretations given them by their pastors as to what the verses of scripture mean…that is why many cannot agree on what the verses actually mean.
I do not know of ANY SS practicing Christian who agree 100% on everything their pastors say about verses of Scripture.

Did you know that SS practicing Christians do not consider their pastors infallible?

**

Is you your view that an infallible authority guarantees unity of beliefs among the fatihful followers? **

Is you your view that misunderstanding of an infallible authority diminishes that authority?
 
Why don’t you give an example, a concrete one, where scripture has acted infallibly?
John 17:17 Sanctify them by** the **truth; your word is truth.
Proverbs 30:5 Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him.
Psalm 138:2 I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name.
Psalm 119:89 For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven…
Psalm 89:34
I will not break my covenant, Nor alter what my lips have uttered.
Psalm 119:142
…Your law is truth.
Psalm 119:151
…All your commandments are truth.
Psalm 119:160
All of your words are truth. Every one of your righteous ordinances endures forever.
Isaiah 55:9-11
For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. For as the rain comes down and the snow from the sky, and doesn’t return there, but waters the earth, and makes it bring forth and bud, and gives seed to the sower and bread to the eater; so shall my word be that goes forth out of my mouth: it shall not return to me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.
so I’ll ask you:
Is it possible for a God breathed writing to be in error?
 
Hmmm… don’t know where you’re going with that. But I’ll leave it to Pablope to carry on.😉
I stated
“Scripture is inerrant and infallible 100% of the time…”

and Pablope corrected me:
so I am asking Pablope if he (she) thinks God breathed writings are capable of error?

You can answer if you like:
Is it possible for a God breathed writing to be in error?
 
You can answer if you like:
Is it possible for a God breathed writing to be in error?
I believe the writings which the Church Infallibly declared are Sacred Scripture are God breathed and free from errors in faith and morals.
 
that’s different: pablobe made this point

So I asked
Is it possible for a God breathed writing to be in error?
2 people might interpret the Bible in 2 different contradictory ways. In terms of the action, human interpretation and human response, one might be erroneous in terms of the other.

Inerrant means what it is in itself. The Bible is free from all error. Infallible implies an action verb (for instance the pope *teaching *with infallibility (protection from error). The Bible itself takes no action.
 
2 people might interpret the Bible in 2 different contradictory ways. In terms of the action, human interpretation and human response, one might be erroneous in terms of the other.
Got it: I’ll never claim humans are infallible
Inerrant means what it is in itself. The Bible is free from all error. Infallible implies an action verb (for instance the pope *teaching *with infallibility (protection from error). The Bible itself takes no action.
Note I have checked 3 different online dictionaries: infallible is an adjective or noun; not an action verb
Just a little caveat…Scripture cannot be infallible, being infallible denotes some actions,** or incapable of error**…
and Paplope agrees with the.merriam-webster defintion
“not capable of being wrong or making mistakes : not fallible”

so I am asking a very simple question

Do Catholics believe it is possible for God breathed writings to contain error?
 
I believe the writings which the Church Infallibly declared are Sacred Scripture are God breathed and free from errors in faith and morals.
apart form faith and morals
Are Scriptures free form errors on other topics?

for example: Could the Creator be wrong about His Creation in the very writings He breathed out?
 
so I am asking a very simple question

Do Catholics believe it is possible for God breathed writings to contain error?
No.

Inspiration and Truth of Sacred Scripture

105 God is the author of Sacred Scripture. "The divinely revealed realities, which are contained and presented in the text of Sacred Scripture, have been written down under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit."69

"For Holy Mother Church, relying on the faith of the apostolic age, accepts as sacred and canonical the books of the Old and the New Testaments, whole and entire, with all their parts, on the grounds that, written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they have God as their author, and have been handed on as such to the Church herself."70

106 God inspired the human authors of the sacred books. "To compose the sacred books, God chose certain men who, all the while he employed them in this task, made full use of their own faculties and powers so that, though he acted in them and by them, it was as true authors that they consigned to writing whatever he wanted written, and no more."71

107 The inspired books teach the truth. "Since therefore all that the inspired authors or sacred writers affirm should be regarded as affirmed by the Holy Spirit, we must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, faithfully, and without error teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to see confided to the Sacred Scriptures."72

108 Still, the Christian faith is not a “religion of the book”. Christianity is the religion of the “Word” of God, “not a written and mute word, but incarnate and living”.73*If the Scriptures are not to remain a dead letter, Christ, the eternal Word of the living God, must, through the Holy Spirit, "open (our) minds to understand the Scriptures."74

103 For this reason, the Church has always venerated the Scriptures as she venerates the Lord’s Body. She never ceases to present to the faithful the bread of life, taken from the one table of God’s Word and Christ’s Body.66
 
No.

Inspiration and Truth of Sacred Scripture

105 God is the author of Sacred Scripture. "The divinely revealed realities, which are contained and presented in the text of Sacred Scripture, have been written down under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit."69

"For Holy Mother Church, relying on the faith of the apostolic age, accepts as sacred and canonical the books of the Old and the New Testaments, whole and entire, with all their parts, on the grounds that, written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they have God as their author, and have been handed on as such to the Church herself."70

106 God inspired the human authors of the sacred books. "To compose the sacred books, God chose certain men who, all the while he employed them in this task, made full use of their own faculties and powers so that, though he acted in them and by them, it was as true authors that they consigned to writing whatever he wanted written, and no more."71

107 The inspired books teach the truth. "Since therefore all that the inspired authors or sacred writers affirm should be regarded as affirmed by the Holy Spirit, we must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, faithfully, and without error teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to see confided to the Sacred Scriptures."72

108 Still, the Christian faith is not a “religion of the book”. Christianity is the religion of the “Word” of God, “not a written and mute word, but incarnate and living”.73*If the Scriptures are not to remain a dead letter, Christ, the eternal Word of the living God, must, through the Holy Spirit, "open (our) minds to understand the Scriptures."74

103 For this reason, the Church has always venerated the Scriptures as she venerates the Lord’s Body. She never ceases to present to the faithful the bread of life, taken from the one table of God’s Word and Christ’s Body.66
thank you for answering
 
???
Are you saying that 1 Corinthians 7:12 is not a God breathed verse?
Are you saying that 1 Corinthians 7:12 is Paul’s and not the word of God?
Hi aw,

Well it can go two ways. For sure all of writ is God breathed. And for sure an apostle is sent forth to speak, write with the authority of God/,Jesus . The best I can say is that God breathed into Paul to write ,“I speak , not the Lord” on a specific issue. Paul does end up saying, '…after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God." vs 40. Why does Paul refrain from saying “thus sayeth the Lord” which he has every right to ? Is that equal to saying, " I think also I have the Spirit of God and here is my judgement" ?

To me it is a nice touch on a such a personal issue of whether to marry or not, or not to let go or not a wife who wishes to depart due to your faith. It seems less ‘top down’, and more of “let us reason together”. Do we not all have the Spirit of God in us, with which to also judge by and equally concur and or follow ?

But thank you for making sure none of writ is minimized. Good question.

Blessings
 
Paul, himself, is distinguishing a command of God from a discipline he sees as wise. He was careful to do so, and inspired by God to do so.
HI rc,

Just finished replying to aw and now I read your reply where you say pretty much the same thing, but in less but still precise words. I like the “inspired to do so” part. I just heard this explained on the radio the other day.

Blessings
 
I stated
“Scripture is inerrant and infallible 100% of the time…”

and Pablope corrected me:
so I am asking Pablope if he (she) thinks God breathed writings are capable of error?

You can answer if you like:
Is it possible for a God breathed writing to be in error?
yes ,generally infallible is a step up from inerrant. I can get 100% score on my test .I have been inerrant, but not infallible for i just as surly could have gotten a 98 , or maybe I will next time. Infallibility would suggest I get 100 % all the time, because i just can’t be in error.

So, as you say, I would think scripture is both inerrant and infallible in truth giving and trustworthiness.

Blessings
 
Got it: I’ll never claim humans are infallible

Note I have checked 3 different online dictionaries: infallible is an adjective or noun; not an action verb

and Paplope agrees with the.merriam-webster defintion
“not capable of being wrong or making mistakes : not fallible”

so I am asking a very simple question

Do Catholics believe it is possible for God breathed writings to contain error?
Scripture is “inerrant” in its message of salvation. Depends on what you mean by “error”.

From the previous posts, I assume you have a better understanding of what it means to be infallible?
 
yes ,generally infallible is a step up from inerrant. I can get 100% score on my test .I have been inerrant, but not infallible for i just as surly could have gotten a 98 , or maybe I will next time. Infallibility would suggest I get 100 % all the time, because i just can’t be in error.

So, as you say, I would think scripture is both inerrant and infallible in truth giving and trustworthiness.

Blessings
But ben…so how does scripture convey or give the truth?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top