:Wait a minute a recovery of Catholic heritage? Your Protestant your heritage is Luther, Calvin, Cramner not Saint Benedict and Saint Francis.:
It isn’t an either/or. Luther, Calvin, and Cranmer came from the Catholic heritage and saw themselves as reforming its more recent distortions. I don’t defend all their views or their actions. But I don’t need to, any more than I need to defend everything about the medieval Church. Benedict and Francis are as much a part of my tradition as Luther or Cranmer or Wesley (Calvin really doesn’t have much to do with my tradition of Protestantism at all). I don’t expect you to see it that way. But you need to understand that we see it that way, and simply shouting at us is not going to convince us of the contrary.
: More like a denial of your roots as Protesters.:
Do you have any idea how Protestants came to be called Protestants? It has nothing to do with some generalized attitude of “protesting” everything in the previous tradition. The patristic and medieval heritage is very bit as much ours as the Reformation heritage is.
: If you really
want to rediscover your catholic heritage become catholic and stop kidding yourself.:
I have indeed given serious thought to the view that communion with Rome is necessary in order to be Catholic. I’m strongly inclined to believe that it is necessary for full catholicity. But I don’t see full catholicity in your communion either. If we are to recover our catholic heritage fully, that will eventually require reunion with Rome. But it seems to me that Rome will also need to change for that to happen. Not as part of some wishy-washy compromise, but rather as a means of becoming more faithful to the Gospel and to Sacred Tradition.
: Gee I should rediscover my Protestant heritage and dress like a Pilgrim oh wait a minute that would be insane Catholic heritage is in complete contradiction with Protestant roots.:
So you say. I understand why you think that, and I don’t harbor the illusion that yelling at you will convince you otherwise.
:Here’s a clue rediscover your catholic heritage by reading the Pope’s encyniclas.:
That’s very good advice. I would recommend in return that you acquaint yourself with the hymns of Charles Wesley, but I fear that such a counsel would fall on deaf ears.
:High Church Protestants love the look and feel of catholcism yet are intellecutally dishonest when they refuse to accept full catholic teaching and that what catholcism is full christian teaching.:
No, it would be intellectually dishonest to say that the doctrines of the Roman communion are full Christian teaching when we don’t think they are.
:You have been around this board forever Contrani and catholics have given you a fair shake:
I don’t complain of my treatment.
: while you have not returned the favor:
How have I not given Catholics a “fair shake”?
: so stop crying wolf that your offended and now won’t consider catholcism.:
I would never let your rudeness get in the way of my appreciation of Catholicism. Others may not be able to see past your crude behavior.
: We seek to exchange truth:
You’re not uttering any truth–just thoughtless slogans.
: but you just want to pretend to be catholic wihtout accepting catholic teaching.:
You’re begging the question, which is precisely whether being “catholic” is absolutely to be identified with being in communion with Rome. I’m not pretending anything, and saying that I am is simply not helpful unless you can back it up somehow.
In Christ,
Edwin