G
guanophore
Guest
I agree, and so I have not. As I have said, I do not know if the member is role playing for effect, or not. It may be that he really does not believe what he writes. However, the content and tone of the post represent anti-Catholic bigotry. I honestly believe that he got if from elsewhere. It appears he has been on a steady diet of it for years, and it just regurgitates here. I recently learned that the same attitude is held against the Muslims! So clearly, it goes across the board, so to speak. Only God knows the heart, and only God can judge a man. However, we are called to discern actions, and that, I have done.You are cluthing at straws here; you have no basis by which to call someone online that you never met “bigoted.” How do you know, unless you can read minds?
Ok. This has been done on numerous threads, and there is probably already one open. Revelation is apocalyptic literature, and is multilayered. Any one image can carry many interpretations. For example, we know that the Son born of the Woman is the Saviour of the world, so Mary is a appropriate understanding of the image. There are others as well.Before the Pope named her; Mary existed in the Bible’s great prophecies, as the virgin who would give birth to the Messiah.
However, as fond as Catholics are becoming of naming “the woman” in Revelation 12 as “Mary;” it would be very poor exegesis to do so; for when we consider other Bible texts related to this passage; it is plain to see that this text has nothing to do with “Mary.” I think I will start a topic on rev.12 later tonight when I have time. This would be worth exploring further.
I agree. The same grave robbers who took Jesus body could have taken Mary’s.There is NO proof of where Mary’s tomb actually is, it is all guesses and wishful thinking. An empty tomb proves nothing, unless evidence can be seen of what happened to the body. It’s not “the word of the Lord” to tell lies and rumors to your children