Protestant Vs. Catholic (it's for school, please respond)

  • Thread starter Thread starter biandblessed
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

biandblessed

Guest
I have to write a paper comparing and constrasting the Protestant and Catholic faiths. Not being part of either myself I thought it would do some good to get some opinions from people who practice. I have not done much research yet but I am interested in the religions as they are now. What is the same between the two? what is different? I am also interested in your opinions on one or the other or both. I’m not here to start a Catholic bashing or Protestant bashing argument I am just interested in the opinions out there. If I do end up using someone’s opinion proper credit will be given to the site (and screen name? I have never done this before). I know I have asked for opinions and please share, but I am not interested in “why you should be a Catholic/Protestant”. Also any book titles on the subject that might be useful would be appreciated. Thanks!🙂
 
I have to write a paper comparing and constrasting the Protestant and Catholic faiths. Not being part of either myself I thought it would do some good to get some opinions from people who practice. I have not done much research yet but I am interested in the religions as they are now. What is the same between the two? what is different? I am also interested in your opinions on one or the other or both. I’m not here to start a Catholic bashing or Protestant bashing argument I am just interested in the opinions out there. If I do end up using someone’s opinion proper credit will be given to the site (and screen name? I have never done this before). I know I have asked for opinions and please share, but I am not interested in “why you should be a Catholic/Protestant”. Also any book titles on the subject that might be useful would be appreciated. Thanks!🙂
All of the individual tracts at the Catholic.com website provide good short explanations for why Catholics believe certain things that various protestant denominations reject. Also, there’s a good general description of what Catholicism teaches in the “Catholicism for Dummies” book by Fr. John Trigilio.

Another good book that highlights the distinctions is Karl Keating’s book Catholicism and Fundamentalism. This is a great primer on the modern doctrinal tensions between Fundamentalists and Catholics. This is the book that got me started in apologetics, and answered a lot of my questions about my own faith, and its misperception by sincere members of non-Catholic christian communities.

Good luck with your paper.

Peace,
Robert
 
Without bashing, you should be aware that there is no such thing as “the Protestant faith,” as Protestants disagree among themselves as to what are articles of faith.

Some are Trinitarian, some are not.

Some are Chalcedonian in their Christology; some are Arian.

Some believe that Baptism and Eucharist are somehow channels of grace; some deny this.

And so it goes.
 
Catholic Church:
founder: Jesus Christ
2000 years old
pope + his infallibility
Marian Apparitions
Apparitions of Jesus + messages for the world (Faustina)
Priesthood (real presence, sacrament of reconcilliation)
holy orders
gay marriages - not allowed
abortion - not allowed
CC on protestants - separated brethren who believe in some heresies
veneration of Mary and saints
membership in freemasonery - not allowed
it is possible to show only the CC is the right Church
contraception - not allowed
Trinity

Protestantism:
founders: Luther, Calvin, Hnery VIII and many others
500 or less, sometimes much less years old
anybody can be a protestant “pope” and believe in his infallibility
no Marian apparitions
Apparitions of Jesus + messages for the world - never heard
no priesthood (no real presence, conversation to a protestant minister instead of reconcilliation or “confession” straight to God)
no holy orders
gay marriages - depending on the denomination
abortion - depending on the denomination
contraception - depending on the denomination
protestants on the CC - depending on the denomination (usually - enemy, Whore of Babylon)
usually no veneration of Mary and saints
membership in freemasonery - depending on the denomination (the same enemy - the CC)
it is not possible to show which protestant denomination (among thousands) is the right one
usually Trinity (except for Yehova’s Witness - they call themselves Christians, a part of protestant tradition)
 
I am interested in the human element. If I were to simply write a historical paper of how these religions came to be it would be quiet a dry paper that has been written over and over before. Its not until the human element is introduced that makes a subject come to life. Take the Titanic for instance. Putting the movie aside for a moment the event has sadly become just a textbook fact that children are taught to remember, take the test on and then forget. I did the same. It was not until I started reading stories of survivers, people that had actually lived through this, that the event was brought to life and I realized it was not just a ship that is at the bottom of the ocean but a true tragedy. Not belonging to these religions I cannot add the human element into the paper myself, it would be a mockery to try fabricate a perspective that I don’t truely understand. So forgive me if it seems out of character to try to better undertand the perspectives I am writing on.
 
Freemasonry not allowed?Why?
ScriptureCatholic.com:
Freemasonry is incompatible with Christianity because it promotes indifferentism. Indifferentism is the heretical belief that all religions are equally legitimate attempts to explain the truth about God which, but for the truth of His existence, are unexplainable. Such a view makes all truths relative and holds that God can be equally pleased with truth and error. Because Christians believe that God has definitively revealed Himself in the person of Jesus Christ, and desires that all men come to the knowledge of this truth, indifferentism is incompatible with Christian faith. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6).

Freemasonry’s teachings and practices also result in syncretism which is the blending of different religious beliefs into a unified whole. This is evidenced most especially by Masonry’s religious rituals which gather men of all faiths around a common altar, and place all religious writings along side the Bible on the Masonic altar. This is also demonstrated by the Lodge’s prayers and its unique names and symbols for God and heaven. Syncretism is the logical consequence of indifferentism.

The Lodge’s practice of requiring its members to swear immoral oaths is also incompatible with Christianity. These oaths require a Christian to swear on the Holy Bible that he will uphold a code of moral conduct that prefers Masons over non-Masons, and to preserve secret passwords and handshakes. Such oaths are gravely immoral because their subject matter is trivial or does not give rise to the necessity of an oath. These oaths are also sworn under symbolic, blood-curdling penalties of physical torture and death called self-curses (e.g., having my throat cut across, and my tongue torn out by its roots). These penalties show a lack of respect for God and amount to blasphemy which is a serious sin.
 
Catholic Church:
Protestantism:
founders: Luther, Calvin, Hnery VIII and many others
500 or less, sometimes much less years old
anybody can be a protestant “pope” and believe in his infallibility
no Marian apparitions
Apparitions of Jesus + messages for the world - never heard
no priesthood (no real presence, conversation to a protestant minister instead of reconcilliation or “confession” straight to God)
no holy orders
gay marriages - depending on the denomination
abortion - depending on the denomination
contraception - depending on the denomination
protestants on the CC - depending on the denomination (usually - enemy, Whore of Babylon)
usually no veneration of Mary and saints
membership in freemasonery - depending on the denomination (the same enemy - the CC)
it is not possible to show which protestant denomination (among thousands) is the right one
usually Trinity (except for Yehova’s Witness - they call themselves Christians, a part of protestant tradition)
To the OP,
This is precisely the kind of information you want to avoid, as it contains polemics, half truths, and misinformation.
But it does point to something you might want to consider (Cluny hinted at this), and that is to narrow your focus regarding Protestant traditions to perhaps one - Reformed, for example.
Code:
But the best advice I can think of is go to the source for each tradition you choose to use.
Don’t ask, for example, a Lutheran what Catholics believe, or a Catholic what Anglicans believe.

Jon
 
To the OP,
This is precisely the kind of information you want to avoid, as it contains polemics, half truths, and misinformation.
But it does point to something you might want to consider (Cluny hinted at this), and that is to narrow your focus regarding Protestant traditions to perhaps one - Reformed, for example.
Code:
But the best advice I can think of is go to the source for each tradition you choose to use.
Don’t ask, for example, a Lutheran what Catholics believe, or a Catholic what Anglicans believe.

Jon
And sometimes it doesn’t help a lot to ask an Anglican what Anglicans believe.

GKC
 
And sometimes it doesn’t help a lot to ask an Anglican what Anglicans believe.

GKC
Well, it helps if you want to know what THAT Anglican believes, and when it comes right down to it, that’s what you get no matter who you ask about thier particular belief system. 🤷

Y’know what, though?

that’s enough to go on. At the bottom, whenever anybody is debating/conversing with another about religious beliefs, it’s all about individual beliefs, just as, ultimately, salvation is a very personal thing.
 
Or you could begin your paper talking about Catholicism, and then take from that all the major protestant branches that broke, and talk about them as the religion was created. I.e. Lutherans would be the first. And talk about how the beliefs change from each Protestant sect, and why they believe this.
Or like someone else said, you could just focus on one protestant denomination. Like Calvinist, reformed etc.

I think you should focus on the 7 sacraments of the church, faith and works, salvation issues (we are not OSAS), Mary & Saints but maybe write about the rosary and how it is biblical etc, and maybe bring up Purgatory, and definitely the pope.

You should post your paper when you are done 🙂
 
I have to write a paper comparing and constrasting the Protestant and Catholic faiths. Not being part of either myself I thought it would do some good to get some opinions from people who practice. I have not done much research yet but I am interested in the religions as they are now. What is the same between the two? what is different? I am also interested in your opinions on one or the other or both. I’m not here to start a Catholic bashing or Protestant bashing argument I am just interested in the opinions out there. If I do end up using someone’s opinion proper credit will be given to the site (and screen name? I have never done this before). I know I have asked for opinions and please share, but I am not interested in “why you should be a Catholic/Protestant”. Also any book titles on the subject that might be useful would be appreciated. Thanks!🙂
That is a large subject to distill down to one paper. How long is your paper? 😉

The similarities and differences, as we are now in relationship to each other, has a very broad spectrum. Lowest common denominators: God, Jesus Christ and Salvation. That is the view from 35000 feet. The view on the ground could take volumes of discussion.
 
As a teacher of humanities and comparative religions your paper is going to be 150 pages long unless you find a way to limit it’s scope. May I recommend that your paper be cut down to include only three faiths. Catholic, obviously, then I would compare it to a mainstream Protestant denomination (Lutheran, Anglican, Methodist, Presbyterian) and then one Fundamentalist church. Doing so will give you a broad scope but not overwhelm you. There are a number of sources online that do a pretty nice (but sometimes rather shallow) job of explaining the differences between the mainstream Protestant faiths and Catholicism.
 
I have to write a paper comparing and constrasting the Protestant and Catholic faiths. Not being part of either myself I thought it would do some good to get some opinions from people who practice. I have not done much research yet but I am interested in the religions as they are now. What is the same between the two? what is different? I am also interested in your opinions on one or the other or both. I’m not here to start a Catholic bashing or Protestant bashing argument I am just interested in the opinions out there. If I do end up using someone’s opinion proper credit will be given to the site (and screen name? I have never done this before). I know I have asked for opinions and please share, but I am not interested in “why you should be a Catholic/Protestant”. Also any book titles on the subject that might be useful would be appreciated. Thanks!🙂
The similarity between the two groups is that both believe Jesus to be both the Son of God, through a Virgin Birth, and to be God Himself - Trinity: belief in One God that is 3 Persons: Father, Son (Jesus) & Holy Spirit. Both groups also believe that the Bible is inspired by God.

The primary differences are:
  1. Protestants do not believe that Jesus gave the Church an earthly leader aka a Pope even though it is described the Bible: book of Matthew Chapter 16 - especially Verse 18.
  2. Protestants do not believe that Jesus gave His Own Body and Blood for us to eat and drink through the miracle of the Eucharist as described in the Bible: book of John Chapter 6. The first part of the chapter describes a miracle of multiplication of loaves and fishes showing that He is capable of feeding all Christians through out the centuries His Body and Blood & the second half of the Chapter, Jesus clearly states, repeatedly, that we must eat His Flesh and Drink His Blood. It is at the end of this Chapter, that it is mentioned that the Apostle Judas will betray Jesus because he is the only one of the 12 Apostles who walked away in his heart (earlier in the Chapter, many of Jesus’ other followers physically walked away when realized what Jesus was saying).
There are other differences, of course, but these are the main two.

If you look at the History of the two - The Catholic Church was founded around 33 ad by Jesus and the Protestant Churches first began popping up in the 1500’s. The first Protestant Church is the Lutheran Church founded by Martin Luther, a former Catholic Monk, who in his own words, saw visions of the devil that scared him so badly that he did what the devil told him. He began a sexual relationship with a Catholic Nun - who after breaking away from the Catholic Church, he eventually married. Martin changed the Bible by removing books of the Bible that didn’t agree with his theology - so if today, you look at the table of Contents in a Protestant Bible & a Catholic Bible, you will notice that 7 books are missing from the Protestant Bible. Another Protestant Church started in the 1500s with King Henry the 8th in England as he wanted to get a divorce, which is against Catholic teaching, so he created the Anglican Church when the Pope would not “bend” Catholic Church Doctrine (which had been established with the beginning of the Church, taught & practiced for over 1500 years at that point) to the will of the king. Many other Protestant Churches broke away and continue to break away from these Protestant Churches and other Protestant Churches for nearly 500 years, meanwhile the Catholic Church remains strong and unaltered in her beliefs and teachings.

Also in interpretation of the Bible, the Catholics interpret the Bible as a whole, where as the Protestants take bits and pieces to “prove” their theology while ignoring entire sections of the Bible that doesn’t fit with their theology. Although Protestants claim to “believe in the Bible Alone”, it would also be true to say that Catholics do not derive their theology from the Bible, but that the Catholic Theology was already around, having been already verbally taught by Jesus and the Apostles, when the Catholics wrote the Scriptures in the 1st Century and complied what would and would not be considered Sacred Scripture/the Bible in the 400s. Because the Catholics both wrote and complied the Bible, nothing in the Bible, when taken as a whole and in context, contradicts the Catholic Teachings. It is also true that Protestants do not believe all that the Bible says - for instance one Protestant Theology is that people are “saved by faith alone” yet the Bible: book of James as a whole, but especially Chapter 2 Verse 24 - where it specifically says “See how you a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.” This is problematic, but since it that verse does not agree with their theology, they ignore the Bible. The Protestants may claim “The Bible Alone”, but in practice, they do not believe all the teachings in the Bible - as the example of the book of James shows.

It’s all very interesting. I studied quite a bit over many years as I used to be a Protestant and now I am a Catholic. My entire family is still Protestant.

I saw that someone recommended to you for additional research “Catholicism and Fundamentalism” by Karl Keating - I also recommend that book to you for research.

Good luck - hope you have an A!!!
 
Start out with the basic, most 2 obvious differences:

(1) Beliefs on Authority

A. Catholics realize a sort of “3-legged stool” of Christian truth. First there’s Apostolic Tradition (also called Sacred Tradition or just Tradition), which would include all of the Apostles’ teachings passed down from the Apostles themselves and their successors, the bishops. Sacred Scripture, the Bible, is included in Apostolic Tradition. The Bible is the written Word of God, inspired, etc. Next would be the Magisterium, or the teaching office of the Church. In this view, the Bible is not just simply a “dead letter” – it needs an authentic interpreter – the Church who formed the Bible should be able to interpret it.

B. Most if not all Protestants adhere to the belief in “sola scriptura” (“by faith alone”), a belief that came out of the Reformation. There are many definitions for it; usually each Protestant tradition has a different idea about it. But the main point is that the Bible is the full and complete source of Christian truth and authority.

(2) Beliefs on Salvation

A. In general, Catholics believe that we are saved by grace alone but not by mere belief alone. We are saved by faith, but we must also have the virtues of love and hope present within our souls. Through God’s grace, we must continue to say “yes” to God and do his will. When we say that Catholics believe in salvation by faith and works, it must be understood correctly. Both come from God’s grace. Good works do not come from a natural, human initiative. This is what Pelagianism is, which some Protestants accuse Catholics of. No, rather, good works is basically grace in action, God working through us.

B. To Protestants, we are saved by faith alone. This, of course, came from Martin Luther and the reformers. Some will say this means by belief or acceptance alone (accepting Jesus as personal Lord and Savior). Others will say that good works must be present, and that authentic faith will produce works of love. Catholics agree with this.

See the tracts & articles here on Catholic.com for more info. Also, go to vatican.va to read the Catechism of the Church. 👍
 
=SingleMomMonica;5767680]The similarity between the two groups is that both believe Jesus to be both the Son of God, through a Virgin Birth, and to be God Himself - Trinity: belief in One God that is 3 Persons: Father, Son (Jesus) & Holy Spirit. Both groups also believe that the Bible is inspired by God.
Ok so far.
The primary differences are:
  1. Protestants do not believe that Jesus gave the Church an earthly leader aka a Pope even though it is described the Bible: book of Matthew Chapter 16 - especially Verse 18.
Not necessarily true. There are many who believe that the Bishop of Rome has, as the patriarch of the west, a singularly important leadership role in the Church, but not to the extent that has been claimed by Rome, which we believe is in conflict with the early Church (as do the Orthodox).
  1. Protestants do not believe that Jesus gave His Own Body and Blood for us to eat and drink through the miracle of the Eucharist as described in the Bible: book of John Chapter 6. The first part of the chapter describes a miracle of multiplication of loaves and fishes showing that He is capable of feeding all Christians through out the centuries His Body and Blood & the second half of the Chapter, Jesus clearly states, repeatedly, that we must eat His Flesh and Drink His Blood. It is at the end of this Chapter, that it is mentioned that the Apostle Judas will betray Jesus because he is the only one of the 12 Apostles who walked away in his heart (earlier in the Chapter, many of Jesus’ other followers physically walked away when realized what Jesus was saying).
A totally false statement for Lutherans, many Anglicans and others.
If you look at the History of the two - The Catholic Church was founded around 33 ad by Jesus and the Protestant Churches first began popping up in the 1500’s. The first Protestant Church is the Lutheran Church founded by Martin Luther, a former Catholic Monk, who in his own words, saw visions of the devil that scared him so badly that he did what the devil told him.
Inflammatory and polemical. Site your source where Luther claims to have done what the devil told him to do.
He began a sexual relationship with a Catholic Nun - who after breaking away from the Catholic Church, he eventually married.
Site your source that this was a sexual relationship prior to marriage.
Martin changed the Bible by removing books of the Bible that didn’t agree with his theology
Flat falsehood. Luther translated and included all the books typically fuound in a 16th centruy western Bible
  • so if today, you look at the table of Contents in a Protestant Bible & a Catholic Bible, you will notice that 7 books are missing from the Protestant Bible.
Even the 1611 KJV included the DC. Can’t blame this on Luther, as it happened well after his death.
Also in interpretation of the Bible, the Catholics interpret the Bible as a whole, where as the Protestants take bits and pieces to “prove” their theology while ignoring entire sections of the Bible that doesn’t fit with their theology.
Opinion without a basis in fact.
Although Protestants claim to “believe in the Bible Alone”, it would also be true to say that Catholics do not derive their theology from the Bible, but that the Catholic Theology was already around, having been already verbally taught by Jesus and the Apostles, when the Catholics wrote the Scriptures in the 1st Century and complied what would and would not be considered Sacred Scripture/the Bible in the 400s. Because the Catholics both wrote and complied the Bible, nothing in the Bible, when taken as a whole and in context, contradicts the Catholic Teachings. It is also true that Protestants do not believe all that the Bible says - for instance one Protestant Theology is that people are “saved by faith alone” yet the Bible: book of James as a whole, but especially Chapter 2 Verse 24 - where it specifically says “See how you a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.” This is problematic, but since it that verse does not agree with their theology, they ignore the Bible. The Protestants may claim “The Bible Alone”, but in practice, they do not believe all the teachings in the Bible - as the example of the book of James shows.
Evidence of your opinion, and not necessarily what various Protestants actually believe or teach.
I saw that someone recommended to you for additional research “Catholicism and Fundamentalism” by Karl Keating - I also recommend that book to you for research.
Best advice of the post. Research!
And again, don’t ask Catholics what Protestants believe, and don’t ask Protestants what Catholics believe.

Jon
 
And wait!!! One more thing…

Don’t ask protestants if they are catholics… lots of them will say YES!
And don’t ask catholics if they are protestants… all of them will say NO!🙂
 
I have to write a paper comparing and constrasting the Protestant and Catholic faiths. Not being part of either myself I thought it would do some good to get some opinions from people who practice. I have not done much research yet but I am interested in the religions as they are now. What is the same between the two? what is different? I am also interested in your opinions on one or the other or both. I’m not here to start a Catholic bashing or Protestant bashing argument I am just interested in the opinions out there. If I do end up using someone’s opinion proper credit will be given to the site (and screen name? I have never done this before). I know I have asked for opinions and please share, but I am not interested in “why you should be a Catholic/Protestant”. Also any book titles on the subject that might be useful would be appreciated. Thanks!🙂
Gabriel of 12;

The Protestant founders came from the One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church beginning in the 1500’s a.d Up until then the World of Christendom since the ascension of Jesus Christ was one Holy Catholic and Aposotlic Church. The Catholic Church was instituted and founded by Jesus Christ himself. Both Jewish religious and secular authorities from antiquity give witness to this history and fact. The Catholic Church is Apostolic Because her magisterium has succeeded from the Apostles themselves by sacrament of Holy Orders which includes the laying of hands and prayer which continues unbroken in the Catholic Magisterium of Popes, Patriarchs, Bishops, Priests and deacons.

The speech used in scholary circles to distinguish the two communities are “The popular Church” which references the Protestant, non catholic, Evangelicals, non denominational church communities to name a few, which are isolated from one another as far as leadership, doctrine and creed. The protestant communities have splintered into many different Christian communities since the breakaway from the Catholic Church. Each one can trace its founder to either a man or woman. The second term applies to the Catholic Church as the “Institutional Church” that can trace her leadership directly to the Apostles and Jesus himself which includes the Apostolic biblical Teachings and Apostolic oral Traditional teachings which gives us the full deposit of faith from Jesus and his apostles.

The “Institutional Church” (Catholic “universal”) includes one faith, one baptism one Lord since the resurrection of Jesus, which includes a valid ordained Priesthood from Jesus and his apostles unbroken. This Catholic Community consists of both the living and those members in heaven, not to exclude her members in purgatory, this is what makes the Catholic Church universal her members include every tongue, people, nation tribe in every age in the communion of saints. What makes this community united in life and in death? Iam glad you asked? The summit of the Catholic Faith that unites all her members into one body is the True presence of Jesus Christ in the blessed Sacrament the “Eucharist”.

The “popular Church” includes the individual communities that have set themselves apart from Apostolic succession, Apostolic teachings, and most of all the Eucharist which is to partake of the Lords table as one family in God. These have developed new Christian theologies and doctrine that conflict with the “Institutional Church” teachings. Many of them reject the institutional Priest hood established by Jesus in the New Covenant and others maintain a very close Priest hood that brings in the question of validity.

The “popular Church” many believe there is no need of a magisterium, and they give themselves their own “authority” to teach, preach biblical interpretations for themselves, since man has the freedom of his own will to do so. Thus you have many different isolated Church communities deriving from such freedoms that have taken their authority from the man made theology of “Sola fide” and “Sola Scriptura” plus many more since the inception of these two foundational Protestant belief’s.

This is not to say that Christianity as a whole is not united, for she is united to the one Head of Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit. The “popular church” have taken with them many “Truths” from their foundation in the “Institutional Church” and yet have rejected many of the Apostolic Truth’s handed down from Jesus and the Apostles that exist in the “institutional Church” thus the name “protestant” (one who protest’s). But the “institutional Church” views these as our “seperated brethern”. They are our brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ through a valid baptism.

The “popular Church” has gained much growth in the realm of Christian Love, Charity and Christian virtues that makes up her isolated communities. What unites the “popular Church” is the seperation and or “protest” against the “institutional Church”. These titles I have mentioned “popular Church” is better given because of the many, many that have come and gone since the seperation from the “institutional Church”, thereby one cannot address your topic in generalities here without offending the many individual seperated brethern communities.

I would recommend you find common language to express your topic, or else be ready to right a volume of books to inclued every “Christian communty” outside of the “institutional Church” founded by Jesus Christ which is the One Holy Catholic And Apostolic Church.

Books; “God is near us” and “Called to Communion”, by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Ignatius press gives both protestant arguments and Catholic belief’s to Apostolic teachings, (warning,you may need a dictionary and thesaurus for his writings) “The Catholic Church throughout the ages” by John Vidamar, OP, paulist press gives a concise historical walk from Jesus and the apostles to the Catholic Church we have today and Protestant seperation from the Catholic Church. This author is true to both sides of any argument, and lets you know that fact is fact. Its an medium read.

Peace be with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top