Protestant Vs. Catholic (it's for school, please respond)

  • Thread starter Thread starter biandblessed
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I didn’t read all the answers to your question, so if I have repeated something someone else already stated please forgive me. With that said, here’s a few things different.
  1. The Catholic Bible has more books in it than the Protestant Bible.
  2. Catholics know that the New Testament wasn’t written when Jesus was on this earth, therefore we understand that Tradition plays a big part in our Religion and life. Why? After Jesus had risen to Heaven, his followers taught by Verbal Teachings, it wasn’t till many many years later the New Testament was even written. This is why Catholics do not believe in “Solo Scripture”, yet Protestants do.
  3. Catholics believe in the Whole Bible. (since the Protestants don’t have the complete Bible, they are missing some books, it’s safe to say they don’t beleive in the Whole Bible.) Please note: The New Testament in the Catholic and Protestant Bible are the same. It’s the Old Testaments that are different.
  4. Catholics believe more than the Protestants do, such as we beleive in the Communion of Saints. (that would be a topic for you to look up.)
  5. Our Priest do not get married and have children. Protestants Ministers can if they choose to.
  6. Catholics have Nuns, who again do not get married. Protestants don’t have Nuns.
  7. Jesus founded the Catholic Church on Peter. Protestant Churchs are a “break-off” or a “split” from the Catholic Church. History and the Bible proves this.
Well I believe with the answers before me and with the few things I posted your paper is off to a good start.

May God use this as a “seed” for you to grow with.
 
First, gang, according to Oriental Orthodoxy, Catholics and Eastern Orthodox were the first Protestants who broke off from the true Church in the 4th Century.

Second, the Eastern Orthodox Schism occurred in the 12th Century.

Then came Protestant churches splitting off from Rome. The first was the Church of England in the 15th Century. Then came the Reformation in the 16th Century. Luther had no designs on starting a new Church. His intent was to reform the Catholic Church.

If you want a good handle on Luther’s beliefs, read The Book of Concord, starting with Luther’s Small Catechism, his Large Catechism, the Augsburg Confession, and the apology for the Augsburg Confession. Learn the actual history of the Lutheran break-off, not the drivel and nonsense that is spewed here. In fact, anyone who has an opinion or “information” on Luther or his reformation ought to read The Book of Concord. Then you’ll understand the truth of the matter.
 
Then came Protestant churches splitting off from Rome. The first was the Church of England in the 15th Century. Then came the Reformation in the 16th Century. Luther had no designs on starting a new Church. His intent was to reform the Catholic Church.

If you want a good handle on Luther’s beliefs, read The Book of Concord, starting with Luther’s Small Catechism, his Large Catechism, the Augsburg Confession, and the apology for the Augsburg Confession. Learn the actual history of the Lutheran break-off, not the drivel and nonsense that is spewed here. In fact, anyone who has an opinion or “information” on Luther or his reformation ought to read The Book of Concord. Then you’ll understand the truth of the matter.
MusicMan,
Thank you so much for this post.

Jon
 
My husband and I I converted to Catholicism at the age of 47 after spending all our lives as evangelical Protestants.

When we started studying Catholicism, we realized that THE issue was authority.

In the Catholic Church, it is the CHURCH that is the Authority for the Christian. (This is also true in the Orthodox Church.) We believe that Jesus Christ is the Head of the Church, and that the Pope is His earthly vicar who speaks for Him on this earth, and that the Magisterium and the College of Cardinals has Authority, and that the local bishop and priests have authority given to them by the Authoritative Church.

But in the Protestant churches, each individual believer is their own Authority. They say that Jesus Christ is their only Authority, as revealed in the Holy Scriptures and by the Holy Spirit. But for all practical purposes, it is the individual believer who is “in charge” of their life and their decisions.

Yes, in most Protestant churches, the individual believer recognizes the authority of the local church or the pastor or the denomination to delineate doctrine, interpret Scripture, teach faith and morals, etc. But Protestants do not accept a central “binding” authority, and Protestants generally do not accept “apostolic succession.” Protestants do not accept the teaching that Jesus established a real, physical, visible “Church” with a real, physical, visible Authority on this earth. Protestants believe that Jesus established “The Church,” as an invisible, spiritual entity comprised of all believers in Jesus Christ (including Catholics who have accepted Jesus as their personal Lord and Savior.)

The individual believer is free to depart from a church, a pastor, a denomination, if the teachings do not agree with his individual interpretation of the Bible. And although that particular church or denomination may shun the apostate and refuse to allow him entrance unless he repents in public or performs some other “penance,” most individual Protestant Christians will continue to recognize that the person is saved and going to heaven. He has just switched churches. That’s his right, since he is “in charge.” He has not violated any “Authority,” since such an “Authority” doesn’t exist.

This issue of authority was the most difficult one for my husband and me to deal with. We realized that if we accepted the Authority of the Catholic Church, then all the other issues would fall into place. The Veneration of Mary, transubstantiation, the “extra books” in the Catholic Bible, asking the saints to pray, infant baptism, the liturgy, etc. etc.–for all of these “difficult” issues, the answer was, “The Church said it, I believe it, that settles it.”

It was very very difficult to contemplate giving up our freedom to run our own lives. Even an issue like “going to church on Sundays” would no longer be our “choice.” If we became Catholic, we could no longer choose to sleep in on Sunday, because to deliberately do this would be mortal sin and we would lose our salvation.

That teaching was particularly difficult to accept. We had believed most of our lives that salvation could never be “lost.” My husband had grown up in the Assemblies of God, and they believed that salvation could be lost if a believer turned their back on God and rejected His salvation. But according to the Assemblies of God, this rejection of Christ would be manifest through a continued lifestyle of sin, not just one sin of “skipping church” on Sunday. The very idea of losing our salvation over one sin was incomprehensible to us. BUT–if we became Catholic, we would have to accept that the Church had the Authority from Jesus Christ to pronounce that skipping Mass could be “mortal sin” and cause the loss of heaven to a believer.

We saw this as a loss of our “freedom.” And this was very, very hard.

You want the “human side?” Here’s one example of how difficult it was for us to accept the “Authority of the Catholic Church.” All of our lives, we had been taught that masturbation was a perfectly natural, normal act of growing up. Protestant teachers that we revered and trusted had taught this from the pulpit and in writing. After all, there’s nothing in the Bible forbidding it. (Some Christians try to stretch that Old Testament story about Onan spilling his seed to prove that masturbation is wrong, but that doesn’t say anything to women! And it really doesn’t forbid masturbation, it forbids not cooperating with God.)

And yet the Catholic Church calls masturbation grave sin, even mortal sin.

We had to get to a place where we could accept this. I’ll be honest, after five years of Catholicism, we don’t accept the teaching against masturbation emotionally. But we OBEY the Catholic Church because we DO accept the Authority of the Catholic Church. We don’t have to agree, we just accept and obey.

I personally believe that this “freedom to choose” is one of the main reasons why Catholics leave the Catholic Church to become Protestants. The freedom is heady. You can actually skip church if you choose, and no one will say “boo.” Your pastor can have any kind of church service that he or SHE chooses–rock music, plays, panel discussions, classical concert, children’s, teenagers preaching, outdoors, in someone’s living room, etc.

And you don’t have to check in with the Church every time you read the Bible. You can just read it yourself and arrive at your own conclusions, trusting that the Holy Spirit will guide you into all truth.

I think some Catholics find this freedom very exciting and appealing.

My husband and I find just the opposite–that submitting in docility to the Authority of the Catholic Church is true freedom. We KNOW we are on the right path because the Church tells us we are. We were weary of bouncing around from Protestant church to Protestant church and discovering different teachings in each denomination. We were weary of wondering exactly who was in charge at each new church. We like being followers of Christ rather than pretending that we knew we were in His will.
 
First, gang, according to Oriental Orthodoxy, Catholics and Eastern Orthodox were the first Protestants who broke off from the true Church in the 4th Century.

Second, the Eastern Orthodox Schism occurred in the 12th Century.

Then came Protestant churches splitting off from Rome. The first was the Church of England in the 15th Century. Then came the Reformation in the 16th Century. Luther had no designs on starting a new Church. His intent was to reform the Catholic Church.

Gabriel of 12;
Well, according to Joseph Smith founder of the Ladder Day Siants has got your Oriental Orthodoxy beat here, because Mormons believe that the Catholic Church went into apostacy after the First century, so Catholicism fell off the face of the earth, before the Oriental Orthodoxy is able to give its opinion? and then we can go on and on, get the point?

Eastern Orthodoxy maintains an Apostolic Succession to the Apostles and valid sacraments. The Schism that exist today with SOME Eastern Orthodox Catholic Rites remains in the body of Jesus Christ but seperated from His Vicar “Peter” (Mat.16:15-19) this is not the same seperation that exist today as the Protestant Reformation.

I love your take on Luther the x Catholic Priest, but do you agree it is very difficult to place the many seperated Christian communities from the Catholic Church in one category? Without offending another seperated Christian community?

Peace be with you
 
I have to write a paper comparing and constrasting the Protestant and Catholic faiths. Not being part of either myself I thought it would do some good to get some opinions from people who practice. I have not done much research yet but I am interested in the religions as they are now. What is the same between the two? what is different? I am also interested in your opinions on one or the other or both. I’m not here to start a Catholic bashing or Protestant bashing argument I am just interested in the opinions out there. If I do end up using someone’s opinion proper credit will be given to the site (and screen name? I have never done this before). I know I have asked for opinions and please share, but I am not interested in “why you should be a Catholic/Protestant”. Also any book titles on the subject that might be useful would be appreciated. Thanks!🙂
I think if you printout these two charts and use it in your school report, you should get an “A”, especially if your teacher is a Protestant. From my perspective, they are extremely accurate and fair. The charts make a comparison between Confessional Protestants and Catholics. If you need clarification, please ask us. If you focus on authority and justification on the first chart, then you will see the two major differences between both Christian communities. They are the cause of the Protestant Reformation 500 years ago, and are the cause of our seperation today.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=382861
 
I think if you printout these two charts and use it in your school report, you should get an “A”, especially if your teacher is a Protestant. From my perspective, they are extremely accurate and fair.

Gabriel of 12;
I can give witness to your statement here; I taught a biblical history class based on factual evidence, using outside sources including Protestant sources confirming the Catholic Church and her doctrinal teachings and development from the first century, taught at my Parish. 2 out 3 of my college students failed their religious class at their community colleges except one got a “D”. It was later revealed to me, that the Teacher was a Protestant, and their Atheist or non Christian pupils all passed the class. My students came back to me a year later and passed the class after taking it over. They explained to me that, they stopped participating in the oral discussions and knowing very well the answers to the questions from their instructors tests lacked the convincing historical accuracy to his/her protestant views and applied themselves according to the instructors personal views of history and religion instead of “Truth” and passed the class.

So I agree with you, know what position your instructor is teaching from these days and the sources. If it is protestant your probably not going to get the Whole Truth only a view, or lacking the full Truth be it good or bad.

So If I were the OP I would head the warning you gave here, because you can get an “A” from a Protestant instructor if you agree with his/her view of history.
 
2nd Adam;5777681:
I think if you printout these two charts and use it in your school report, you should get an “A”, especially if your teacher is a Protestant. From my perspective, they are extremely accurate and fair.

Gabriel of 12;
I can give witness to your statement here; I taught a biblical history class based on factual evidence, using outside sources including Protestant sources confirming the Catholic Church and her doctrinal teachings and development from the first century, taught at my Parish. 2 out 3 of my college students failed their religious class at their community colleges except one got a “D”. It was later revealed to me, that the Teacher was a Protestant, and their Atheist or non Christian pupils all passed the class. My students came back to me a year later and passed the class after taking it over. They explained to me that, they stopped participating in the oral discussions and knowing very well the answers to the questions from their instructors tests lacked the convincing historical accuracy to his/her protestant views and applied themselves according to the instructors personal views of history and religion instead of “Truth” and passed the class.

So I agree with you, know what position your instructor is teaching from these days and the sources. If it is protestant your probably not going to get the Whole Truth only a view, or lacking the full Truth be it good or bad.

So If I were the OP I would head the warning you gave here, because you can get an “A” from a Protestant instructor if you agree with his/her view of history.
If you think the charts are incorrect, please make the correction on the thread with the chart. They seem correct to me for confessional Protestants and Catholics beliefs too.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=382861
 
Gabriel of 12;5779298:
If you think the charts are incorrect, please make the correction on the thread with the chart. They seem correct to me for confessional Protestants and Catholics beliefs too.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=382861
Gabriel of 12;

The Chart is not correct from a Catholic perspective because they fall short of the definitions. The definitions inserted on the Catholic side comes from a Protestants view summarizing what the Catholic Church teaches.

To get at the heart of the matter, the Catholic Church made it easy for the world to see since Vatican II in her Catechism of the Catholic Church, “say’s it all”. I dont think a Protestant flavor to Catholic belief’s is getting all the facts and Truth to the Catholic Church’ teachings. That’s why Vatican II is so important so that the world can see for herself why Jesus came, died for and resurrected who lives for ever “praise be Jesus Christ” now and forever.
 
I am interested in the human element. If I were to simply write a historical paper of how these religions came to be it would be quiet a dry paper that has been written over and over before. Its not until the human element is introduced that makes a subject come to life. Take the Titanic for instance. Putting the movie aside for a moment the event has sadly become just a textbook fact that children are taught to remember, take the test on and then forget. I did the same. It was not until I started reading stories of survivers, people that had actually lived through this, that the event was brought to life and I realized it was not just a ship that is at the bottom of the ocean but a true tragedy. Not belonging to these religions I cannot add the human element into the paper myself, it would be a mockery to try fabricate a perspective that I don’t truely understand. So forgive me if it seems out of character to try to better undertand the perspectives I am writing on.
You’d be better then to ask individuals to give their personal stories as to why they’ve become Catholic or Protesant, particularly if they’ve jumped ship. I’m one, but I haven’t got the time to go into it in any depth.

I suppose in a nutshell, I’d have to say I think God wanted me to make the move from Protestant to Catholic, and having done so, I think the Catholic Church is CLOSEST to the truth. But my conversion story was not a purely intellectual decision as to what constituted Truth. Conversion stories rarely involve apologetics in the first instance. That comes later.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top