Rock music is as you pointed out a wide genre. But I believe that at least some rock music does induce violence or a violent spirit. I had a colleague who told me about the affects he noticed from different types of music on his young boy. If he was listening to harder forms of rock his boy would jump around violently. With softer forms of music he would not.
Really if you think about it most people are inclined to move their body in some sort of way when they hear music. I’m not much of a dancer but I can say that bluegrass makes me want to tap my foot. For those who do dance we certainly don’t expect a violent, headbanging dance to classical music. It wouldn’t be congruent and it is not what came naturally from the music.
I think there is something very much spiritual about music. It is like language. It is communicated between men via physical means, but what underlies it is really spiritual. In fact Professor Peter Kreeft mentions the idea of the music of Bach being an argument for the existence of God.
For these reasons I do believe that some forms of music are more suited for the worship of God.
And I disagree with your final sentence, although I fully recognize that the Catholic Church has praised Gregorian chant. But the Catholic Church has NOT stated that Gregorian chant is the ONLY music suited for the Mass.
IMO, it depends on a person’s background and upbringing, and also a person’s temperament.
For some reason, my husband finds Bach and other Baroque composers “frantic”. He doesn’t like Handel’s Messiah because of this frantic-ness–gives him a headache. He actually doesn’t like much of any classical music. To him, Baroque music is “headbanging!”
Some people on this board find Gregorian chant highly spiritual and worshipful, but I do not. I wasn’t raised with it, and the only exposure I’ve had to it in my first 47 years was in movies, and of course, back when it became “pop music” during the 1980s. So to me, Gregorian chant and other forms of chant are “secular-sounding” and theatrical. I simply don’t have the background to be able to appreciate chant as “religious music.” I have no association with chant as “church music,” and so that part of me is not there. I’ve been Catholic for eight years now, and I still don’t “get” chant.
OTOH, I do find some contemporary worship/praise music highly worshipful, because that is what I was raised with in church. I was raised Baptist, and we did not go to bars, lounges, or “parties,” and we didn’t listen to much secular rock music. So I do not associate contemporary Christian music with any kind of secularism–to me, it’s “worship music.” I can be brought to tears by certain Christian rock songs, but be left stone cold by Gregorian chant.
But I certainly understand and appreciate why other Christians who grew up with alcohol and parties in their homes, and who went to bars and lounges when they were (hopefully) of legal age, would find any contemporary music “secular” and have a very hard time worshipping or seeing it as appropriate for a Mass.
And I can certainly understand and appreciate why other Catholic Christians who were raised in a traditional Catholic home and attended a traditional Latin Mass would long for the “religious” music and Mass of their upbringing, and find traditional music styles highly worshipful. So do I, only my “religious music” is gospel and rock!
I can also understand why young Christians who were not raised in traditional worship settings would find contemporary Christian music jarring because to them, it sounds like the secular music that surrounds them everywhere they go. They understandably want their church to be different from their everyday experiences. I get that.
I think it’s wonderful that Holy Mother Church encourages all kinds of music in the Masses, and leaves the decision up to the territorial authority (the bishop) instead of making a grand, sweeping pronouncement applicable to all Catholic churches world-wide.
Like I said, it’s all a question of upbringing, background, and temperament.