C
Churchman25
Guest
Is it an even worse sacrilege than a regular sacrilege, if a protestant attended the catholic mass and took the host.
A protestant can’t be expected to know that it isn’t typically allowed. President Clinton can be held guilty to a lot of things, but when the priest offered communion to the president, was it really a sin on the part of Mr. Clinton to accept, he might have thought it would be the height of rudeness to decline for all that the president knew.Is it an even worse sacrilege than a regular sacrilege, if a protestant attended the catholic mass and took the host.
What’s a “regular sacrilege”?Is it an even worse sacrilege than a regular sacrilege, if a protestant attended the catholic mass and took the host.
Well, MOST Protestant baptisms are recognised as valid,Every Protestant baptism is recognized as valid
Yes, Baptism is a must for reception of other sacraments.I don’t know if Baptism is required for the reception of other sacraments as a matter of church law.
There’s are a lot of Protestant baptism that are but there’s a list of “Protestant” denominations as long as my arm whose baptisms are not recognized. My pastor recently sent me a list because I’m involved in baptismal preparation and have to be able to tell folks who they can legitimately have as a Christian witness. In our town that would only be the Anglicans and the members of the United Church of Canada and perhaps a handful of members of the two competing Baptist communities (they are a recent addition to our town’s religious landscape).Every Protestant baptism is recognized as valid
However nice and generous a person she is, she should not be doing this. There are limited circumstances in which a non-Catholic may receive communion, but that would need to be judged by a priest on a case to case basis.The commissioned lay minister in my parish is a very generous lady and gives of her time in extremely meaningful ways, like distributing Holy Communion in a local nursing home. she told me she gives the sacrament to non-Catholics who ask for it.
A priest can hear anyone’s confession, but can only give absolution to a Catholic. He could give anyone advice and a blessing. (One exception is a baptised Christian who is soon to be received into the Church).The late Fr Benedict Groeschel said once that in New York he had Jews come to him to make a confession of sins. He was talking about how surprised he was about this, but I don’t remember him saying how he handled it.
Yes it is.I don’t know if Baptism is required for the reception of other sacraments as a matter of church law.
Most protestant baptisms are valid, but not all. A denomination that rejects the Trinity and therefore does not use the “Father, Son and Holy Spirit” formula for instance for not have a valid baptism (e.g. Jehovah’s Witness). Similarly, a group that does not use flowing water (e.g. Salvation Army) would not have a valid baptism.Every Protestant baptism is recognized as valid and I think Fr. Mitch Pacwa used to “kid” about that on EWTN Live, in a way that suggested that all these protestants were budding Catholics or something.
And Jesus said it would have been better for Judas if he had never been born. Not exactly an endorsement of his behaviour. There can be little doubt that Judas was the first person to receive Communion unworthily (and we all know what St Paul had to say about doing that).Even Judas received the sacrament at the Lord’s last passover meal.
It is true we are held to a standard of being guilty for what we know and not what we did not know. It is true in a general sense that a Protestant can’t be expected to know. It is sadly probably true that in a real sense many Catholics don’t know.A protestant can’t be expected to know that it isn’t typically allowed. President Clinton can be held guilty to a lot of things, but when the priest offered communion to the president, was it really a sin on the part of Mr. Clinton to accept, he might have thought it would be the height of rudeness to decline for all that the president knew.