Protestants Are Infallible!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gilbert_Keith
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Mickey:
Hi ahimsaman72! :tiphat:

Sacred Tradition has always taught an invisible and visible Church. Many protestants reject the visible one.

Blessings to you,
Mickey
Yes, I realize this. I reject the view that the Church is ONLY visible. I see it as both. It’s both what you can see and what you can’t see. Tradition has its place - I don’t reject it totally. I try to look at what Scripture says and what men have said - regardless of affiliation and/or stature.

Peace…
 
Gilbert Keith:
ahimsaman

*Though I am certain of my belief regarding baptism I would not die for such a belief. *

Bertrand Russell used to say the same thing about his beliefs, which were not the least bit religious…

So are there any of your beliefs that you would die for, as the early Christian martrys died for theirs?

What would they be?
I have read Russell’s work, “Why I am not a Christian”. It evokes powerful emotions and thoughts. He was after all a philosopher. It’s not the function of a philosopher to be dogmatic, is it? So, I take what philosopher’s say at face value.

Any beliefs I would die for? :hmmm:

That’s a pretty general area - but generally I would not die for a belief. To me it is dangerous to say, “I would die for this belief”. Because in the end, who knows? Have you ever been faced with this kind of situation? Probably not. Neither have I. So, I find it uncomfortable to outright say in every instance yea or nay.

After all - are we talking of intellectual assent to a belief? Or are we talking about a belief of the heart? I think the two are distinguishable.

Peace…
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
I might be wrong. I’ve read the Scriptures and the commentaries and come up with different interpretations or opinions on a certain subject from other protestants and Catholics. I could be wrong - I could be right. In the end I will have to answer for my own soul and no one elses. I am more than willing to be judged for my beliefs and actions - knowing that I did my best and could only agree and practice what my CONSCIENCE allowed.
There’s nothing wrong with that if one knows one has a well-formed conscience guided by the immutable teachings of Christ passed down through his Church. 😉
in·fal·li·ble %between%
adj. **1. **Incapable of erring: an infallible guide; an infallible source of information.
**2. **Incapable of failing; certain: an infallible antidote; an infallible rule.
**3. **Roman Catholic Church Incapable of error in expounding doctrine on faith or morals.
The reason the Church claims infallibility isn’t because we consider ourselves infallible but because we believe Christ and the Holy Spirit are infallible. Jesus promised the Apostles that the Holy Spirit would lead them into all truth–the same truth Christ taught and continues to teach through the Church he established. We have to remember that Jesus didn’t establish a book. He established a Church, and the book of the Church, the Bible, belongs to the Church and is the support and witness to the Church.
Now, I believe man is totally depraved - unable to be perfect - like Christ in this human body. Therefore, neither I nor you nor any human being or institution is infallible.

Peace…
Why do you believe in total depravity? Is that position really supported by all the writings to come out of the Church since 33 AD, including the Bible?

And, as I cited above, the charism of infallibility has nothing to do with human imperfection since it is the Holy Spirit who guarantees that what the Church teaches is the truth, not anyone human being or group of human beings, not even the pope. What the Magisterium does is look at all sides, prays and then decides what is the truth, relying on Christ’s promise to lead his Church into all truth.
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
It only makes sense that there is a “gate” in reference to “the place of the dead”. What do you see in a cemetary? A **gate **leading into the “place of the dead”.
“It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into hell, where the worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.”

“Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.”
 
40.png
JimO:
If someone is relying on their own individual interpretation and understanding of Scripture, and they realize that their interpretation might be wrong, how can one have assurance of salvation?
I believe Scriptures teach perseverance of the saints, but if I am wrong, then regardless I will have to stand on my works then. I’m unsure 100% about a lot of things, but that doesn’t make me squirm or become terrified.

Peace…
 
40.png
Ahimsa:
What do you fellows mean when you ask “But would youdie for a belief”?

If I believe in X with all of my heart and soul, and someone says “I will kill you if you tell me that you believe in X,” am I required to tell him my true beliefs and die?
I would lie so that my three beautiful daughters would have a father come home to them, not to mention my wife 🙂
If I believe the sky is blue, and if some insane person wants to kill people who believe that the sky is blue, then am I going to give him that opportunity?
Not me.
If I were Christian, say, Baptist, would I be willing to die for my belief in “believer’s baptism”? Or would I save my potential for martyrdom for something more pan-Christian, like my belief in Jesus as savior?
I would potentially die if given the option to confess Christ or die. At least I could not hang my head in shame. If, however, I died for a belief in a doctrine, then I would be ashamed at my children losing their father for such a meaningless cause. Good examples Ahimsa!!

Peace…
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Tradition has its place - I don’t reject it totally.
Ah yes, and this is usually the lynch pin to the great divide. Catholics and Orthodox believe that Sacred Tradition interprets Scripture. But the reformation teaches that each individual interprets it for themselves. (see my signature below).

Peace brother,
Mickey
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
I might be wrong. I’ve read the Scriptures and the commentaries and come up with different interpretations or opinions on a certain subject from other protestants and Catholics. I could be wrong - I could be right. In the end I will have to answer for my own soul and no one elses. I am more than willing to be judged for my beliefs and actions - knowing that I did my best and could only agree and practice what my CONSCIENCE allowed.

in·fal·li·ble %between%
adj. **1. **Incapable of erring: an infallible guide; an infallible source of information.
**2. **Incapable of failing; certain: an infallible antidote; an infallible rule.
**3. **Roman Catholic Church Incapable of error in expounding doctrine on faith or morals.

Now, I believe man is totally depraved - unable to be perfect - like Christ in this human body. Therefore, neither I nor you nor any human being or institution is infallible.

Peace…
But Christ is infallible and His Truth is nevery changing. And, man is not totally depraved but “made in God’s image” and “very good.” Nearly all Christians believe that the Bible is infallible and inspired by the Holy Spirit. Catholics believe that the Holy Spirit inspired the Catholic Church when it selected the books to be in the Bible and it continues to inspire the Church through the Magisterium. As the original poster noted, each Protestant either relies on another man (usually their pastor) or themselves to interpret the Bible. In both cases, it becomes obvious why there are 30,000+ denominations and millions of individuals who all believe they have the “truth”.

Two of the greatest virtues that come from the gift of Faith is that of submission and obedience. For a Catholic, that is submission and obedience to an authority that has remained true for 2,000+ years to the God’s revelation consistent with the OT, NT, and Sacred Tradition (which predates the NT) while a Protestant submits and obeys either an interpretation of themselves or another person in recent history. Even the Lutherans/Calvinists (Methodists, Presbyterians, Reformed et. al) don’t practice a “truth” that would be recognized by Luther/Calvin.
 
40.png
Della:
There’s nothing wrong with that if one knows one has a well-formed conscience guided by the immutable teachings of Christ passed down through his Church. 😉

The reason the Church claims infallibility isn’t because we consider ourselves infallible but because we believe Christ and the Holy Spirit are infallible. Jesus promised the Apostles that the Holy Spirit would lead them into all truth–the same truth Christ taught and continues to teach through the Church he established. We have to remember that Jesus didn’t establish a book. He established a Church, and the book of the Church, the Bible, belongs to the Church and is the support and witness to the Church.
Of course, I would have to disagree.
Why do you believe in total depravity? Is that position really supported by all the writings to come out of the Church since 33 AD, including the Bible?
Because all sin has passed from Adam to all human beings - inherently sinful - original sin. Here is Romans 3:9-13 explaining the nature of man:

both Jews and Greeks that they are all under sin.
10 As it is written:
Code:
  *“ There is none righteous, no, not one;*
   11 *There is none who understands;*
  *There is none who seeks after God.*
   12 *They have all turned aside;*
  *They have together become unprofitable;*
  *There is none who does good, no, not one.”***("http://bible.gospelcom.net/passage/?book_id=52&chapter=3&version=50#fen-NKJV-27998b")]
   13 *“ Their* *throat* *is* *an open* *tomb;*
  * With their tongues they have practiced deceit”;*[c](http://bible.gospelcom.net/passage/?book_id=52&chapter=3&version=50#fen-NKJV-27999c)]
And, given the fact that many have sought to be perfect (saints) and have fallen - then that’s experimental proof that man is totally depraved - unable to save himself and be anything but inherently sinful.
And, as I cited above, the charism of infallibility has nothing to do with human imperfection since it is the Holy Spirit who guarantees that what the Church teaches is the truth, not anyone human being or group of human beings, not even the pope. What the Magisterium does is look at all sides, prays and then decides what is the truth, relying on Christ’s promise to lead his Church into all truth.
 
Mickey said:
“It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into hell, where the worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.”

“Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.”

I’m not exactly sure of where you are going with this, but I’ll take a shot at it.

Here is a good example of “gate”. This gate leads to life (eternal) whereas the gates of hell leads inevitably to death (like I already mentioned).

Peace…
 
40.png
Mickey:
Ah yes, and this is usually the lynch pin to the great divide. Catholics and Orthodox believe that Sacred Tradition interprets Scripture. But the reformation teaches that each individual interprets it for themselves. (see my signature below).

Peace brother,
Mickey
If it makes you feel any better - I don’t believe in Sola Scriptura either.🙂

Peace brother…
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
If, however, I died for a belief in a doctrine, then I would be ashamed at my children losing their father for such a meaningless cause.
Since I believe that Catholic doctrine is inseparable from Christ as the head of the Church, I would hope that I chose death–even at the risk of leaving a widowed wife and a fatherless child.

He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. (Matt 10:37)
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
If it makes you feel any better - I don’t believe in Sola Scriptura either.🙂

Peace brother…
I wasn’t feeling bad in the first place. 🙂
 
40.png
Orionthehunter:
But Christ is infallible and His Truth is nevery changing. And, man is not totally depraved but “made in God’s image” and “very good.” Nearly all Christians believe that the Bible is infallible and inspired by the Holy Spirit. Catholics believe that the Holy Spirit inspired the Catholic Church when it selected the books to be in the Bible and it continues to inspire the Church through the Magisterium. As the original poster noted, each Protestant either relies on another man (usually their pastor) or themselves to interpret the Bible. In both cases, it becomes obvious why there are 30,000+ denominations and millions of individuals who all believe they have the “truth”.
First, I believe Christ is infallible and His truth unchanging. Second, I still contend man is totally depraved. “made in God’s image” is ambiguous. We could discuss what this means all day, but it really goes beyond this thread. Third, I don’t believe that one group of people has the only truth. The Jews thought they were the only chosen ones and look what happened. It is clear from the NT that the Gentiles have been given the opportunity for salvation as well.
Two of the greatest virtues that come from the gift of Faith is that of submission and obedience. For a Catholic, that is submission and obedience to an authority that has remained true for 2,000+ years to the God’s revelation consistent with the OT, NT, and Sacred Tradition (which predates the NT) while a Protestant submits and obeys either an interpretation of themselves or another person in recent history. Even the Lutherans/Calvinists (Methodists, Presbyterians, Reformed et. al) don’t practice a “truth” that would be recognized by Luther/Calvin.
I submit to God only and the revelation given through various prophets and lastly by Christ Himself. Even if the Catholic Church assembled the Scriptures (they did of course) we would still have the OT Scriptures.
 
40.png
Mickey:
Since I believe that Catholic doctrine is inseparable from Christ as the head of the Church, I would hope that I chose death–even at the risk of leaving a widowed wife and a fatherless child.

He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. (Matt 10:37)
If something borders on the absurd, then I do not follow it. For example, I figure since God put me and my wife together and created my children, then for me to separate from them for whatever reason is not justifiable. If He wanted me to die for my faith then He could do it some other way. It is verses like the one above that I find fault with. Either I misunderstand what it means or I simply question God about it.

I simply refuse to die for just anything - not ideas or beliefs or perceived truth.

Peace…
 
Ahimsaman

Is there no circumstance, then, in which you would die for your faith, as Jesus died, as Peter and Paul died, as Stephen and so many others died in order to found the true faith?

Please leave your children out of the equation: or at least pretend that you have no children and are free to make the decision without concern for the welfare of your wife, children, brothers and sisters, cousins, aunts and uncles, grandparents, great grandparents, etc.

If you can still say there is no circumstance in which you would die for your faith, then I could see why you do not believe in the infallibility of Christ’s teachings anywhere in the world.
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
I submit to God only and the revelation given through various prophets and lastly by Christ Himself. Even if the Catholic Church assembled the Scriptures (they did of course) we would still have the OT Scriptures.
Just keep in mind that you are submitting to a god and truth that is of your creation since you are the arbiter of what is true and godly. Such a submission is not to God and Truth but to something that you created and not God.
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
If something borders on the absurd, then I do not follow it. For example, I figure since God put me and my wife together and created my children, then for me to separate from them for whatever reason is not justifiable. If He wanted me to die for my faith then He could do it some other way. It is verses like the one above that I find fault with. Either I misunderstand what it means or I simply question God about it.

I simply refuse to die for just anything - not ideas or beliefs or perceived truth.

Peace…
I understand how you feel. There are hard teachings in the Bible. (see John 6). Personally, I would be honored to offer my life, like the Holy Martyrs, for my belief in Jesus Christ. As I said, I would hope that I had the strength and grace to do so if the situation ever arose. Our life here is but a blink of an eye compared to eternity. As much as I love my wife and child, my love for Jesus must far surpass that. Yes, my wife and I are one through the sacrament of Holy Matrimony and my child is a beautiful gift from God. But God my creator is my life and my love and my purpose for existence. I yearn to be united with my Savior–and there would not be a more blessed way to join Him than to follw the footsteps of the Holy Martyrs of the faith–however unlikely my martyrdom may be.

Blessings to you,
Mickey
 
Gilbert Keith:
Ahimsaman

Is there no circumstance, then, in which you would die for your faith, as Jesus died, as Peter and Paul died, as Stephen and so many others died in order to found the true faith?
I don’t know. I’ve never encountered that situation. I could tell you all day long how much of a hero I would be in an emergency situation, but could I do it? would I do it? I won’t know unless I truly experience it. I don’t believe Stephen planned his death. He was in a particular situation and succumbed to it.
Please leave your children out of the equation: or at least pretend that you have no children and are free to make the decision without concern for the welfare of your wife, children, brothers and sisters, cousins, aunts and uncles, grandparents, great grandparents, etc.

If you can still say there is no circumstance in which you would die for your faith, then I could see why you do not believe in the infallibility of Christ’s teachings anywhere in the world.
How can I leave my loved ones out of it? I’m trying to be modest and give you the worst case scenario, yet you keep prodding. For the most part, I would not die for a belief - hypothetical or real - regardless of whether I had loved ones or not. I would have in the past when I was really fundamentalist. But, at the stage I am at in my Christian life - I would not be a martyr.

I’m coming out of Buddhism and re-introducing myself to my Christian faith so my heart isn’t all the way there yet in the re-version - so maybe given time I would die for the faith.

Peace…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top