E
excaliber
Guest
One bishop lays hands on anotherWe all agree on this. The lens of interpretation that differs is the picture of The Church. For Orthodox, the true church is composed of those believers in Christ who submit to the authority of Orthodox bishops. For Catholics, it is composed of believers who submit to the authority of the bishop of Rome. For some Protestants, it is those who confess their particular creed, whatever their location, denominational affiliation, or historical time period. For many other Protestants, including me, the True Church is composed of everyone who trusts Jesus to save them from sin, again notwithstanding geography, denomination, history, or other credal differences.
Each system has different requirements for its continuance.
The gaps I was talking about are questions Scripture does not answer.
To you, yes, it’s not only important but critical. How can the True Church continue without Tradition? For me, it’s informative but not critical. If I was the last Christian on earth, I could still continue The True Church without interruption. No need for special continuous offices. Both Orthodox and Catholics need at least three surviving Christians, and at least three have to be bishops. Otherwise, it all ends.
continually…so what? Why do we find fault with the Church?
Protestant preachers exercise athority over there flocks do they not? I hear them preaching about paying 10 percent to there churches.
You canot avoid athority.
Someone has to be the interpreter
of scripture.
Obviosly if one dose not think God started an organized group, when judaism failed…then you have not read the bible, because there are church councels recorded there.
Yes the bishops of Orthodoxy and The Pope of Rome exercise athority. Who else qualifies?
Tell me who is more qualified?
