D
dronald
Guest
He most certainly taught that one ought to wait before Baptism:Yes and he describes Catholic baptism well too.
I am certain Tertullian would agree that if he wrote anything contrary to the Catholic faith that it should be rejected.
I don’t believe he did, but I see how you hand your hat on one father among dozens. Why?
Tertullian (160-225)
On Baptism Chapter 18
newadvent.org/fathers/0321.htm
But they whose office it is, know that baptism is not rashly to be administered. Give to every one who begs you, has a reference of its own, appertaining especially to almsgiving. On the contrary, this precept is rather to be looked at carefully…
…. And so, according to the circumstances and disposition,** and even age, of each individual, the delay of baptism is preferable; principally, however, in the case of little children. For why is it necessary— if (baptism itself) is not so necessary — that the sponsors likewise should be thrust into danger? Who both themselves, by reason of mortality, may fail to fulfil their promises, and may be disappointed by the development of an evil disposition, in those for whom they stood? The Lord does indeed say, Forbid them not to come unto me. Let them come, then, while they are growing up; let them come while they are learning, while they are learning whither to come; let them become Christians when they have become able to know Christ.**
Why does the innocent period of life hasten to the remission of sins? More caution will be exercised in worldly matters: so that one who is not trusted with earthly substance is trusted with divine! Let them know how to ask for salvation, that you may seem (at least) to have given to him that asks.
And he ends with a very firm:
If any understand the weighty import of baptism,** they will fear its reception more than its delay**
Tertullian in the following chapters explains heavily into how a candidate shall act, all assuming the individual is of age to comprehend what is happening. Not an infant.