M
MDK
Guest
The idea of transubstantiaion was blieved by the Apostles. It was formally defined later. All of your other confusion has been addressed already.InterestingI have been thinking just this week about; symbols,parables,allegories, metaphors, and such! The Bible is full of symbolism, just look at Ephesians 6:10-18! The breastplate of righteousness, the “belt” of truth, the “shield” of faith, etc. And Christ being depicted as a lion and a lamb! And communion; wine and grape juice are both from the “fruit of the vine”, yet some Christians are rebuked for using grape juice instead of wine! And shouldn’t we use unleavened bread, as Jesus told of how yeast in bread, was like sin, and that it coul infect the whole loaf! When Jesus, and His disciples celebrated the Passover meal, also known as the Last Supper, and shared the wine and bread, didn’t each disciple drink of the wine, and eat the bread, which Christ said was His broken body(not literally, of course) And I know that the catholic church believes that John 6:51-59, is the basis for the Holy Communion, or Eucharist! What I would like to know is,1) if all of the disciples drank from the cup, why is the catholic priest, the only one who drinks from it at mass,2) Isn’t the wafer(symbol of Jesus’s body) and the wine(symbol of Jesus’s blood) the same as grape juice, and unleavened bread? Was the practice of transsubstantiation began by the apostles, or is it more modern?