D
Dokimas
Guest
Posted by ProdicalSon quoted from Ignatius
Ch[SIGN]apter VIII.-Let Nothing Be Done Without the Bishop.
Ch[SIGN]apter VIII.-Let Nothing Be Done Without the Bishop.
A person not having the Holy Spirit can’t understand. Even with the Holy Spirit, God has given teachers and preachers to aid our growth.Act 8:30 And Philip running thither, heard him reading the prophet Isaias. And he said: Thinkest thou that thou understandest what thou readest?
Act 8:31 Who said: And how can I, unless some man shew me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
The authority of the Church, Philip, preached Jesus to him and he believed!
The scripture doesn’t say the eunuch knew who God was. The scripture shows Philip asking if he UNDERSTANDEST what he was reading? If he couldn’t understand, he couldn’t interpret…
You have failed to answer any questions that I have politely asked of you, some repeatedly.
Please discontinue the condescending tone in your posts.
New Testament example against private interpretation, that shows the scriptures were not enough authority.
Act 8:27 And rising up, he went. And behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch, of great authority under Candace the queen of the Ethiopians, who had charge over all her treasures, had come to Jerusalem to adore.
Act 8:28 And he was returning, sitting in his chariot and reading Isaias the prophet.
Act 8:29 And the Spirit said to Philip: Go near and join thyself to this chariot.
Act 8:30 And Philip running thither, heard him reading the prophet Isaias. And he said: Thinkest thou that thou understandest what thou readest?
Act 8:31 Who said: And how can I, unless some man shew me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
Act 8:32 And the place of the scripture which he was reading was this: He was led as a sheep to the slaughter: and like a lamb without voice before his shearer, so openeth he not his mouth.
Act 8:33 In humility his judgment was taken away. His generation who shall declare, for his life shall be taken from the earth?
Act 8:34 And the eunuch answering Philip, said: I beseech thee, of whom doth the prophet speak this? Of himself, or of some other man?
Act 8:35 Then Philip, opening his mouth and beginning at this scripture, preached unto him Jesus.
Act 8:36 And as they went on their way, they came to a certain water. And the eunuch said: See, here is water: What doth hinder me from being baptized?
Act 8:37 And Philip said: If thou believest with all thy heart, thou mayest. And he answering, said: I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
Act 8:38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still. And they went down into the water, both Philip and the eunuch. And he baptized him.
The eunuch had the scriptures only. Yet, he could not understand them until the authority, Philip, opened his mouth and preached Jesus to him.
The Church was one, in many locations. You, yourself, said the letters and epistles were circulated among the Churches (at least I think you said that, forgive me if I’m mistaken). Even if they received individual letters, the message was the same. We’ve already agreed there are no contradictions in the Bible. There was one truth being shared among all the Churches. They didn’t have denominations then.Ac 9:31 Then the churches throughout all <3650> Judea, Galilee, and Samaria had peace and were edified. And walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, they were multiplied.
Ac 15:22 Then it pleased the apostles and elders, with the whole <3650> church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas, namely, Judas who was also named Barsabas, and Silas, leading men among the brethren.
Ro 16:23 Gaius, my host and the host of the whole <3650> church, greets you. Erastus, the treasurer of the city, greets you, and Quartus, a brother. The whole church world wide or local?
1Co 14:23 Therefore if the whole <3650> church comes together in one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those who are uninformed or unbelievers, will they not say that you are out of your mind? The church world wide or the church of Corinth?
The OT came from the Jews. Did they understand the interpretations about Jesus?Martin Luther, leader of the Protestant reformation, conceded that the Bible came from the Catholic Church.
If the Bible came from the Catholics, surely they know the correct interpretation.
I’ve given you alot to read and reflect on, just add prayer. Now, I have to go to Church, my wife has to work tomorrow, so we attend the Saturday vigil. Be back soon.![]()
I have answered your questions as best as I can.Act 8:30 And Philip running thither, heard him reading the prophet Isaias. And he said: Thinkest thou that thou understandest what thou readest?
Act 8:31 Who said: And how can I, unless some man shew me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
The authority of the Church, Philip, preached Jesus to him and he believed!
The scripture doesn’t say the eunuch knew who God was. The scripture shows Philip asking if he UNDERSTANDEST what he was reading? If he couldn’t understand, he couldn’t interpret…
You have failed to answer any questions that I have politely asked of you, some repeatedly.
Please discontinue the condescending tone in your posts.
It is an example of the dangers of private interpretation. If Philip had not been sent to the eunuch, he would have never understood what he was reading.A person without the Holy Spirit can’t get the correct interpretation from within. This is not a verse against private interpretation by Christians. The verse you should use is 2Pe 1:20 “knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation,”
BTW, just because non-catholics have an interpretation different than the CC doesn’t mean it’s a private interpretation (unless the CC is 100% accurate in its interpretation of Scripture – which I doubt).
Let’s cut to the chase, show me the scriptures that tell us the Bible is the only authority. Show me the scriptures that teach us to interpret scriptures for ourselves. I have requested these scriptures repeatedly. if they don’t exist, they are man made beliefs that come from outside the Bible…I have answered your questions as best as I can.
The scriptures say he didn’t know if it was Isaiah or another man.The book of Isiaih was in reference to Jesus the being the messiah. If he was from Ethiopia and had not seen or heard of Jesus how would he have known who Jesus was? He did not have a point of reference to whom Jesus was until Phillip had told him.
The scripture doesen’t say he didn’t know who God was either.
It was copied and pasted…from a Protestant website. I didn’t change anything, with the exception of bolding and underlining. You can find it in The Epistle of Ignatius to the Smyrnaeans.Posted by ProdicalSon quoted from Ignatius
Ch[SIGN]apter VIII.-Let Nothing Be Done Without the Bishop.
See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as ye would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution(55) of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper(56) Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.(57) [/SIGN]
I believe that where Jesus is it His church, the univeral church. Did Ignatius use CC or cc?
Some did, some rejected it.The OT came from the Jews. Did they understand the interpretations about Jesus?
It is an example of the dangers of private interpretation. If Philip had not been sent to the eunuch, he would have never understood what he was reading.
I have used 2 Peter 1:20 and it’s in my notes. Believe it or not, you haven’t seen all the scriptures I use when discussing private interpretation.
I told you, I was a convert and I didn’t convert without doing my ‘homework’. I continue my homework and as I prayed for all to open their hearts and minds to His truth, I didn’t leave myself out. I ask questions and I pray for answers. That works very well for me. Most answers come, from as little as 2 hours to as long as 2 days, but I always get my answer. Sometimes the answer hits me when I least expect it. Something on tv, a discussion with friends, happen on it in scriptures, or in the Church, the answer is given to me.
The questions I put forth on these forums are sincere, but no one answers them. The answers supporting my view have been made available to me, to the glory of God.
I respect your answers even though I disagree with many of them on the topics we disagree on.
Where are the scriptures stating the Bible is the only authority?What questions have you asked that haven’t been answered.
I know it’s going off topic just a bit, but I’d like to see your response to the question quoted above. (This shouldn’t lead us to a debate, it was an ‘oh wow’ moment for me when I realized it. Your question about the Jews made me think of it.)Some did, some rejected it.
Let me ask you a question that just came to mind, why did Christ say the words in the verse below?
Mat 27:46 And about the ninth hour, Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying: Eli, Eli, lamma sabacthani? That is, My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?
I know it’s going off topic just a bit, but I’d like to see your response to the question quoted above. (This shouldn’t lead us to a debate, it was an ‘oh wow’ moment for me when I realized it. Your question about the Jews made me think of it.)
These questions are red herrings like where is the word trinity in the bible. I believe you belive those scriptures say those things but I don’t necessarily believe it. I was a cradle catholic 28 years before I finally left because the bible taught different things than the church did.Let’s cut to the chase, show me the scriptures that tell us the Bible is the only authority. Show me the scriptures that teach us to interpret scriptures for ourselves. I have requested these scriptures repeatedly. if they don’t exist, they are man made beliefs that come from outside the Bible…
I have provided many, many, scriptures with point by point explanations supporting my view.
The scriptures say he didn’t know if it was Isaiah or another man.
Philip had to preach Jesus to him so he knew who it was. If all he had was a Bible, and he had scriptures, he would not have known the truth. That’s the point. We cannot fly over a country of non-believers and drop Bibles to them and expect them to know the truth, unless someone explains it to them.
Ok, I’ll be honest here, I would be happy to see anyone decide to join the Catholic Church, but that’s not why I put up the arguments I do. You see, it bothers me for some people to say, Catholic beliefs are not Biblical. I feel I have made the case for the topics discussed in this thread to show these beliefs are Biblical, even if you don’t agree with the interpretation.
Can you be honest and say that you think that my beliefs that disagree with the CC are not Biblical?
Where are the scriptures stating the Bible is the only authority? I doubt that there is any verse so direct. BTW, I have not problem with traditions that compliment the Bible but I do have problems with those that seem to contradict the Bible or that ‘shine a spotlight’ on anything other than Jesus/God.
Where are the scriptures teaching us to interpret scriptures for ourselves? ** I have quoted 2 Peter 1 that tells us the Bible is to be privately understood**.I saw where you said, we have to have an authority teach us. I believe you said ‘teachers and preachers’. Let me give you a bit of advice on that, don’t let them laugh you off without giving you an answer and then examine it and question it as you feel led too. Don’t worry; I study for myself; what I believe comes from listening and studying - at this point in my life it comes from mostly study.![]()
The Jews knew Old Testament scriptures. They were read to them at the Temple and synagogues.It is a fulfillment of an OT verse.
Also, Jesus suffered as a Human. When He was taking our sin God looked away because He can’t look upon sin. Paul said as recorded in … 2 Corinthians 5:21 “For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.”
As for the Trinity, it is more than implied by several scriptures and is not the same thing. Where does scriptures state that the Bible, or scriptures, are the only authority? Where do scriptures teach us that we should privately interpret scriptures? If it’s not in the Bible, either specifically or implied, then it has to be a man-made tradition.These questions are red herrings like where is the word trinity in the bible. I believe you belive those scriptures say those things but I don’t necessarily believe it. I was a cradle catholic 28 years before I finally left because the bible taught different things than the church did.
We will not agree here and it maybe no more than semantics. The scriptures say ‘understand’, one has to interpret to understand. The other point is, if the Bible were the only authority, then nothing else would be needed.Like I said he was from Ethiopia how would he know who Jesus or Isiaih or any other Jewish person was. He had no cultural references to go by. V 35 Then Philip began with that very passage of Scripture and told him the good news about Jesus.
Phillip did not just tell him who Jesus was but used scripture as his authority not his own or any organization.
'Over 100 ties in the NT is scripture quoted as the authority or definition for what happened."Over 100 times in the NT is scripture quoted as the authority or defination for what happened.
A whole new discussion. Did you post on the wrong thread by chance?James 2:20 (“faith without works is dead”)
–We need to do “good works” as well as have faith.
This is what I believe that to mean:
When we have truely accepted Christ as our savior, the Holy Spirit comes to live within us. When that happens, I believe people have a desire to do good things for other people; to show the love of Christ to others. I don’t believe that we are required to do “good works”, because the Bible tells us that we are saved by faith NOT by works. We should be willing to do things for the Lord, but if we do not, I don’t believe that we’re not saved.
The fruits of the spirit are another thing that show that we have become a Christian, by those actions, people are able to see a change.
Now, some people seem to get the idea that they are always going to be more happy, kind, patient, and have more self control once they become a Christian; but that is false.