Protestants, who have been around awhile, question about the Virgin Mary

  • Thread starter Thread starter rinnie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
?Job,1:8 "Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is non like him on the earth, a perfect and upright man, one that feareth God and eschewith evil ? " Enoch and Elijah were both translated to heaven.Well at least they went “up”,did not see death. Remember for 1800 years you did not have to believe in the IC. You were a Catholic in very good standing , even Apostolic ,to say the things I am saying about Mary. And the same could be said for most of your arguments also.
I thank you for making your position more clear, albeit in a round about way. I’ll admit you threw me for a loop there for a minute. Now may I turn the conversation for a minute and ask you, what are your views on the perpetual virginity of our mother? Would that be something you think is a rather modern phenomenon also? I ask this because I think it ties into the whole teaching of Mary, prophecised and created and made pure for the sole purpose of being the God bearer. I also think you will have to acknowledge her perpetual virginity was acceptable to the early church fathers all the way to Luther and Calvin and others who would condemn these more modern day rejections of the Marian doctrines as heretical! I found it suprising when studying Martin Luther what a great defender he was of our mother and how far off today’s Protestant is now even from his alternate views.
 
David Ruiz,

You are not accurate in your history. I posted earlier in this thread that the IC is not a modern teaching. It was believed by Early Church Christians. Didn’t you see the hymns? and their comments posted several pages before?

I guess all the early Church fathers, some which even knew the apostles didn’t know what they were talking about, eh? 🤷

See early church hymns such as

“He was the ark formed of incorruptible wood. For by this is signified that His tabernacle was exempt from putridity and corruption.” Hippolytus, Orations Inillud, Dominus pascit me {ante A.D. 235).

“This Virgin Mother of the Only-begotten of God, is called Mary, worthy of God, immaculate of the immaculate, one of the one.” Origen, Homily 1{A.D. 244).

“Let woman praise Her, the pure Mary.” Ephraim, Hymns on the Nativity 15:23 {A.D. 370).

“Thou alone and thy Mother are in all things fair, there is no flaw in thee and no stain in thy Mother.” Ephraem, Nisibene Hymns 27:8 {A.D. 370).

“O noble Virgin, truly you are greater than any other greatness. For who is your equal in greatness, O dwelling place of God the Word? To whom among all creatures shall I compare you, O Virgin? You are greater than them all O Covenant, clothed with purity instead of gold! You are the Ark in which is found the golden vessel containing the true manna, that is, the flesh in which divinity resides.” Athanasius, Homily of the Papyrus of Turin 71:216 {ante AD 373}.

“Mary, a Virgin not only undefiled but a Virgin whom grace has made inviolate, free of every stain of sin.” Ambrose, Sermon 22, 30 {A.D. 388}.

“We must except the Holy Virgin Mary, concerning whom I wish to raise no question when it touches the subject of sins, out of honour to the Lord; for from Him we know what abundance of grace for overcoming sin in every particular was conferred upon her who had the merit to conceive and bear Him who undoubtedly had no sin.” Augustine, Nature and Grace 4, 36 {A.D.415}.

“As he formed her without my stain of her own, so He proceeded from her contracting no stain.” Proclus of Constantinople, Homily 1 {ante A.D. 446}.

“A virgin, innocent, spotless, free of all defect, untouched, unsullied, holy in soul and body, like a lily sprouting among thorns.” Theodotus of Ancrya, Homily 6, 11{ante A.D. 446}.

“The angel took not the Virgin from Joseph, but gave her to Christ, to whom she was pledged from Joseph, but gave her to Christ, to whom she was pledged in the womb, when she was made.” Peter Chrysologus, Sermon 140 {A.D. 449}.

“The very fact that God has elected her proves that none was ever holier than Mary, if any stain had disfigured her soul, if any other virgin had been purer and holier, God would have selected her and rejected Mary.” Jacob of Sarug {ante A.D. 521}.

“She is born like the cherubim, she who is of a pure, immaculate clay.” Theotokos of Livias, Panegyric for the feast of the Assumption 5:6 {ante A.D. 650}.

“Today humanity, in all the radiance of her immaculate nobility, receives its ancient beauty. The shame of sin had darkened the splendour and attraction of human nature; but when the Mother of the Fair One par excellence is born, this nature regains in her person its ancient privileges and is fashioned according to a perfect model truly worthy of God…. The reform of our nature begins today and the aged world, subjected to a wholly divine transformation, receives the first fruits of the second creation.” Andrew of Crete, Sermon 1 On the Birth of Mary {A.D. 733}.

“Truly elect, and superior to all, not by the altitude of lofty structures, but as excelling all in the greatness and purity of sublime and divine virtues, and having no affinity with sin whatever.” Germanus of Constantinople, Marracci in S. Germani Mariali {ante A.D. 733}.

“O most blessed loins of Joachim from which came forth a spotless seed! Oh glorious womb of Anne in which a most holy offspring grew.” John of Damascus, Homily 1 {ante A.D. 749}.

The Greek Fathers

Here are a number of ancient experts and what they say it means; each of them is a Greek-speaker from a culture basically identical to that of St. Luke; there are a couple repeats from the previous thread, but from them I give new material, too; the passages are expositions by the authors of the meaning of Luke 1:28, generally centered on chaire, Kecharitomene:

Gregory Thaumaturgus (205-270 AD):

O purest one
O purest virgin
where the Holy Spirit is, there are all things readily ordered.
Where divine grace is present
the soil that, all untilled, bears bounteous fruit
in the life of the flesh, was in possession of the incorruptible citizenship,
and walked as such in all manner of virtues, and lived a life more excellent than man’s common standard
thou hast put on the vesture of purity
has selected thee as the holy one and the wholly fair;
and through thy holy, and chaste, and pure, and undefiled womb
since of all the race of man thou art by birth the holy one,
and the more honourable, and the purer, and the more pious than any other:
and thou hast a mind whiter than the snow, and a body made purer than any gold

Akathist hymn (5th or 6th century AD):

Hail, O you, through whom Joy will shine forth!
Hail, O you, through whom the curse will disappear!
Hail, O Restoration of the Fallen Adam!
Hail, O Redemption of the Tears of Eve!
Hail, O Peak above the reach of human thought!
Hail, O Depth even beyond the sight of angels!
Hail, O you who have become a Kingly Throne!
Hail, O you who carry Him Who Carries All!
Hail, O Star who manifest the Sun!
Hail, O Womb of the Divine Incarnation!
Hail, O you through whom creation is renewed!
Hail, O you through whom the Creator becomes a Babe!
Hail, O Bride and Maiden ever-pure!

Theodotus of Ancyra (early 5th century AD):

Hail, our desirable gladness;
Hail, O rejoicing of the churches;
Hail, O name that breathes out sweetness;
Hail, face that radiates divinity and grace;
Hail, most venerable memory;
Hail, O spiritual and saving fleece;
Hail, O Mother of unsetting splendor, filled with light;
Hail, unstained Mother of holiness;
Hail, most limpid font of the lifegiving wave;
Hail, new Mother, workshop of the birth.
Hail, ineffable mother of a mystery beyond understanding;
Hail, new book of a new Scripture, of which, as Isaiah tells, angels and men are faithful witnesses;
Hail, alabaster jar of sanctifying ointment;
Hail, best trader of the coin of virginity;
Hail, creature embracing your Creator;
Hail, little container containing the Uncontainable.
(Homily 4:3; PG 77:1391B-C; Gambero, page 267-8)

“In the place of Eve, an instrument of death, is chosen a Virgin, most pleasing to God and full of His grace, as an instrument of life. A Virgin included in woman’s sex, but without a share in woman’s fault. A Virgin innocent; immaculate; free from all guilt; spotless; undefiled; holy in spirit and body; a lily among thorns.” (Theodotus, Hom 6 in S. Deiparam, No 11; PG 77:1427A) or another translation: “Innocent virgin, spotless, without defect, untouched, unstained, holy in body and in soul, like a lily flower sprung among thorns, unschooled in the wickedness of Eve, unclouded by womanly vanity…Even before the Nativity, she was consecrated to the Creator…Holy apprentice, guest in the Temple, disciple of the law, anointed by the Holy Spirit, clothed with divine grace as with a cloak, divinely wise in your mind; united to God in your heart…Praiseworthy in your speech, even more praiseworthy in your action…God in the eyes of men, better in the sight of God.” (Theodotus, Hom 6:11; Gambero, page 268)

“What did the divine messenger do then? Perceiving the Virgin’s interior dispositions and perspicacity in her outward appearance and admiring her just prudence, he began to weave her a kind of floral crown with two peaks: one of joy and one of blessing; then he addressed her in a thrilling speech of praise, lifting up his hand and crying out: ‘Hail, O full of grace, the Lord is with you, you are blessed’ (Lk 1:28), O most beautiful and most noble among women. The Lord is with you, O all-holy one, glorious and good. The Lord is with you, O worthy of praise, O incomparable, O more than glorious, all splendor, worthy of God, worthy of all blessedness…Through you, Eve’s odious condition is ended; through you, abjection has been destroyed; through you, error is dissolved; through you, sorrow is abolished; through you, condemnation has been erased. Through you, Eve has been redeemed. He who is born of the holy [Virgin] is holy, holy and Lord of all the saints, holy and Giver of holiness. Wondrous is he who generated the Woman of wonder; Ineffable is he who precedes the Woman beyond words; Son of the Most High is he who springs from this highest creature, he who appears, not by man’s willing it, but by the power of the Holy Spirit; he who is born is not a mere man, but God, the incarnate Word.”
(Theodotus, On the Mother of God and on the Nativity; Patrologia orientalis 19:330-1; Gambero, page 271)
 
Our Blessed Mother Mary has always Loved God with all Her Heart, Mind and Soul.
She doesn’t know any other way to Love. This is the will of God, and Mary Loves to do the will of God.
When we pray to Mary, She continues to Love God with all Her Heart, Mind and Soul, the only difference is that now we also Love God perfectly through Her.
Very nice .So now perfect Love is imputed to you thru Mary ? Didn’t you know imputing is a protestant thing ? But no, imputation is good, especially righteousness. In an earlier thread imputed righteousness is not proper theology per some Catholics. Thank-you
 
David Ruiz,

You are not accurate in your history. I posted earlier in this thread that the IC is not a modern teaching. It was believed by Early Church Christians. Didn’t you see the hymns? and their comments posted several pages before?

I guess all the early Church fathers, some which even knew the apostles didn’t know what they were talking about, eh? 🤷

See early church hymns such as

“He was the ark formed of incorruptible wood. For by this is signified that His tabernacle was exempt from putridity and corruption.” Hippolytus, Orations Inillud, Dominus pascit me {ante A.D. 235).

“This Virgin Mother of the Only-begotten of God, is called Mary, worthy of God, immaculate of the immaculate, one of the one.” Origen, Homily 1{A.D. 244).

“Let woman praise Her, the pure Mary.” Ephraim, Hymns on the Nativity 15:23 {A.D. 370).

“Thou alone and thy Mother are in all things fair, there is no flaw in thee and no stain in thy Mother.” Ephraem, Nisibene Hymns 27:8 {A.D. 370).

“O noble Virgin, truly you are greater than any other greatness. For who is your equal in greatness, O dwelling place of God the Word? To whom among all creatures shall I compare you, O Virgin? You are greater than them all O Covenant, clothed with purity instead of gold! You are the Ark in which is found the golden vessel containing the true manna, that is, the flesh in which divinity resides.” Athanasius, Homily of the Papyrus of Turin 71:216 {ante AD 373}.

“Mary, a Virgin not only undefiled but a Virgin whom grace has made inviolate, free of every stain of sin.” Ambrose, Sermon 22, 30 {A.D. 388}.

“We must except the Holy Virgin Mary, concerning whom I wish to raise no question when it touches the subject of sins, out of honour to the Lord; for from Him we know what abundance of grace for overcoming sin in every particular was conferred upon her who had the merit to conceive and bear Him who undoubtedly had no sin.” Augustine, Nature and Grace 4, 36 {A.D.415}.

“As he formed her without my stain of her own, so He proceeded from her contracting no stain.” Proclus of Constantinople, Homily 1 {ante A.D. 446}.

“A virgin, innocent, spotless, free of all defect, untouched, unsullied, holy in soul and body, like a lily sprouting among thorns.” Theodotus of Ancrya, Homily 6, 11{ante A.D. 446}.

“The angel took not the Virgin from Joseph, but gave her to Christ, to whom she was pledged from Joseph, but gave her to Christ, to whom she was pledged in the womb, when she was made.” Peter Chrysologus, Sermon 140 {A.D. 449}.

“The very fact that God has elected her proves that none was ever holier than Mary, if any stain had disfigured her soul, if any other virgin had been purer and holier, God would have selected her and rejected Mary.” Jacob of Sarug {ante A.D. 521}.

“She is born like the cherubim, she who is of a pure, immaculate clay.” Theotokos of Livias, Panegyric for the feast of the Assumption 5:6 {ante A.D. 650}.

“Today humanity, in all the radiance of her immaculate nobility, receives its ancient beauty. The shame of sin had darkened the splendour and attraction of human nature; but when the Mother of the Fair One par excellence is born, this nature regains in her person its ancient privileges and is fashioned according to a perfect model truly worthy of God…. The reform of our nature begins today and the aged world, subjected to a wholly divine transformation, receives the first fruits of the second creation.” Andrew of Crete, Sermon 1 On the Birth of Mary {A.D. 733}.

“Truly elect, and superior to all, not by the altitude of lofty structures, but as excelling all in the greatness and purity of sublime and divine virtues, and having no affinity with sin whatever.” Germanus of Constantinople, Marracci in S. Germani Mariali {ante A.D. 733}.

“O most blessed loins of Joachim from which came forth a spotless seed! Oh glorious womb of Anne in which a most holy offspring grew.” John of Damascus, Homily 1 {ante A.D. 749}.

The Greek Fathers

Here are a number of ancient experts and what they say it means; each of them is a Greek-speaker from a culture basically identical to that of St. Luke; there are a couple repeats from the previous thread, but from them I give new material, too; the passages are expositions by the authors of the meaning of Luke 1:28, generally centered on chaire, Kecharitomene:

Gregory Thaumaturgus (205-270 AD):

O purest one
O purest virgin
where the Holy Spirit is, there are all things readily ordered.
Where divine grace is present
the soil that, all untilled, bears bounteous fruit
in the life of the flesh, was in possession of the incorruptible citizenship,
and walked as such in all manner of virtues, and lived a life more excellent than man’s common standard
thou hast put on the vesture of purity
has selected thee as the holy one and the wholly fair;
and through thy holy, and chaste, and pure, and undefiled womb
since of all the race of man thou art by birth the holy one,
and the more honourable, and the purer, and the more pious than any other:
and thou hast a mind whiter than the snow, and a body made purer than any gold

Akathist hymn (5th or 6th century AD):

Hail, O you, through whom Joy will shine forth!
Hail, O you, through whom the curse will disappear!
Hail, O Restoration of the Fallen Adam!
Hail, O Redemption of the Tears of Eve!
Hail, O Peak above the reach of human thought!
Hail, O Depth even beyond the sight of angels!
Hail, O you who have become a Kingly Throne!
Hail, O you who carry Him Who Carries All!
Hail, O Star who manifest the Sun!
Hail, O Womb of the Divine Incarnation!
Hail, O you through whom creation is renewed!
Hail, O you through whom the Creator becomes a Babe!
Hail, O Bride and Maiden ever-pure!

Theodotus of Ancyra (early 5th century AD):

Hail, our desirable gladness;
Hail, O rejoicing of the churches;
Hail, O name that breathes out sweetness;
Hail, face that radiates divinity and grace;
Hail, most venerable memory;
Hail, O spiritual and saving fleece;
Hail, O Mother of unsetting splendor, filled with light;
Hail, unstained Mother of holiness;
Hail, most limpid font of the lifegiving wave;
Hail, new Mother, workshop of the birth.
Hail, ineffable mother of a mystery beyond understanding;
Hail, new book of a new Scripture, of which, as Isaiah tells, angels and men are faithful witnesses;
Hail, alabaster jar of sanctifying ointment;
Hail, best trader of the coin of virginity;
Hail, creature embracing your Creator;
Hail, little container containing the Uncontainable.
(Homily 4:3; PG 77:1391B-C; Gambero, page 267-8)

“In the place of Eve, an instrument of death, is chosen a Virgin, most pleasing to God and full of His grace, as an instrument of life. A Virgin included in woman’s sex, but without a share in woman’s fault. A Virgin innocent; immaculate; free from all guilt; spotless; undefiled; holy in spirit and body; a lily among thorns.” (Theodotus, Hom 6 in S. Deiparam, No 11; PG 77:1427A) or another translation: “Innocent virgin, spotless, without defect, untouched, unstained, holy in body and in soul, like a lily flower sprung among thorns, unschooled in the wickedness of Eve, unclouded by womanly vanity…Even before the Nativity, she was consecrated to the Creator…Holy apprentice, guest in the Temple, disciple of the law, anointed by the Holy Spirit, clothed with divine grace as with a cloak, divinely wise in your mind; united to God in your heart…Praiseworthy in your speech, even more praiseworthy in your action…God in the eyes of men, better in the sight of God.” (Theodotus, Hom 6:11; Gambero, page 268)

“What did the divine messenger do then? Perceiving the Virgin’s interior dispositions and perspicacity in her outward appearance and admiring her just prudence, he began to weave her a kind of floral crown with two peaks: one of joy and one of blessing; then he addressed her in a thrilling speech of praise, lifting up his hand and crying out: ‘Hail, O full of grace, the Lord is with you, you are blessed’ (Lk 1:28), O most beautiful and most noble among women. The Lord is with you, O all-holy one, glorious and good. The Lord is with you, O worthy of praise, O incomparable, O more than glorious, all splendor, worthy of God, worthy of all blessedness…Through you, Eve’s odious condition is ended; through you, abjection has been destroyed; through you, error is dissolved; through you, sorrow is abolished; through you, condemnation has been erased. Through you, Eve has been redeemed. He who is born of the holy [Virgin] is holy, holy and Lord of all the saints, holy and Giver of holiness. Wondrous is he who generated the Woman of wonder; Ineffable is he who precedes the Woman beyond words; Son of the Most High is he who springs from this highest creature, he who appears, not by man’s willing it, but by the power of the Holy Spirit; he who is born is not a mere man, but God, the incarnate Word.”
(Theodotus, On the Mother of God and on the Nativity; Patrologia orientalis 19:330-1; Gambero, page 271)
Thank-you .That is a lot of work .Good quotes .Never said IC is a modern teaching . It is a modern doctrine required to be believed(1854) .Big difference between a teaching , an opinion, and a infallible Papal decree/doctrine requiring your obedience .I agreed that good Catholics have argued both ways for centuries. OK ?
 
I thank you for making your position more clear, albeit in a round about way. I’ll admit you threw me for a loop there for a minute. Now may I turn the conversation for a minute and ask you, what are your views on the perpetual virginity of our mother? Would that be something you think is a rather modern phenomenon also? I ask this because I think it ties into the whole teaching of Mary, prophecised and created and made pure for the sole purpose of being the God bearer. I also think you will have to acknowledge her perpetual virginity was acceptable to the early church fathers all the way to Luther and Calvin and others who would condemn these more modern day rejections of the Marian doctrines as heretical! I found it suprising when studying Martin Luther what a great defender he was of our mother and how far off today’s Protestant is now even from his alternate views.
Thank-you for your calm response. First ,never said any Marion doctrine is “modern phenomenon”. Actually said both these arguments have been around for about 1800 years before the IC papal decree a few threads earlier. OK ? Sorry to disappoint but I do not hold to perpetual virginity .Do not think this is “modern” either .Do not see any prophecies of it .You can extrapolate from some scriptures , but for both ways. Yes, am aware of Luther’s error . He also thought Jews were dogs , worthy of being burned. Hitler thought, and wrote he “admired” Luther. I might add he probably carried this over from his Catholic training , as he did Marian views and many other doctrines…Now ,back to a question which you answered with a question .Do you believe a Catholic should believe himself to be cleansed after being baptized (original sin) and thereafter from the holy Sacrament of Penance, where Jesus personally absolves you thru the priest ? How clean is one then ? Are they indwelt , the temple of God ? Will they ever sin again ?
 
Thank-you for your calm response. First ,never said any Marion doctrine is “modern phenomenon”. Actually said both these arguments have been around for about 1800 years before the IC papal decree a few threads earlier. OK ? Sorry to disappoint but I do not hold to perpetual virginity .Do not think this is “modern” either .Do not see any prophecies of it .You can extrapolate from some scriptures , but for both ways. Yes, am aware of Luther’s error . He also thought Jews were dogs , worthy of being burned. Hitler thought, and wrote he “admired” Luther. I might add he probably carried this over from his Catholic training , as he did Marian views and many other doctrines…Now ,back to a question which you answered with a question .Do you believe a Catholic should believe himself to be cleansed after being baptized (original sin) and thereafter from the holy Sacrament of Penance, where Jesus personally absolves you thru the priest ? How clean is one then ? Are they indwelt , the temple of God ? Will they ever sin again ?
I spent like a half and hour coming up with a thoughtful response to your comment then lost it all trying to post it! I’ll have to get back with you tomorrow.
 
Genesis 3;15" And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed". Eve sinned. She was separated from God . She hid. God shed blood of an animal and “covered” her and recocnciled the relationship, but with consequences. Her sin was forgiven-her original sin was forgiven.She was not spiritually dead. From Eve would come children of the light, carriers of the Promise, at odds with the devil .From her would also come children of darkness, children of the devil. Where do get that to be an enemy of the devil you must be perfect ?..
What?:eek: She was not spiritually dead with original sin? Then what she received instant physical death? I don’t think so david, you better go back and read that again.

It does not say that at all. It said a Woman would COME who would not listen to the devil and be at odds with him. How can Eve be at odds with the devil when she gave into him and participated in sin?:confused:

It was the Blessed Mother who was to come. Come on david, since when did Eve have SEED? You might want to rethink this one alot.

Also where I got to put emnity between the devil and oneself is to not sin. To not give into him. God would not let the devil TOUCH the Blessed Mother. Thats means he could not even tempt her to sin.

And when you have never sinned you are PERFECT in the full grace of God. Where do you get if you do not sin you are not perfect:shrug:
 
I spent like a half and hour coming up with a thoughtful response to your comment then lost it all trying to post it! I’ll have to get back with you tomorrow.
This is for David…
OK, first things first…you did kind of imply that the IC was not an accepted concept for 1800 years but, I will accept your response. Second, yes, it is rather disappointing that after much debate and the strong, historically sound facts presented is not enough to sway you to even the possibility if the IC or the PV of the VBM. You do also make a strong case, but to not even admit the possibility is being somewhat stubborn, in my opinion. I do respect your position though. It’s funny, I get the same feeling with you as I get when listening to debates with Muslims. They go round and round but it always comes back to the core beliefs. You get a Muslim to believe in the Trinity, you’ve truly accomplished something. They simply refuse to believe. And the Trinity is a much harder to prove than the IC, also in my opinion. (pls tell me u believe inthe Trinity!!). At least Muslims can unite together in their faith. We are of the same beliefs yet cannot unite. I also find it funny you find Luther to be in such error yet he, a Protestant, is most famed for splitting up the unity of the Church. Do you not also consider that to be one of his many errors? Movin on…now, to answer your questions…YES! I do believe all those things, but I do not believe you must be Catholic or your doomed, I do believe you can be saved without a priest nearby, I do know the differences in baptism with water and by the Holy Spirit (I won’t go there right now), I do believe we are cleansed of our sins at baptism, that the Holy Spirit dwells in us, we are a temple of God. Now, will “they” ever sin again? Well I suppose that is up to the individual. It is called Free Will, no disrespect. That is what gives us our humanity, not sin! That is the difference, God gave Mary free will (as with Eve) Mary obeyed, she did not sin! I think I’ve covered everything, now I will await the big “Gotcha” moment from you. Sorry for any typo’s, I’m on my iPod and am running out of juice. Have a blessed day!
 
What I said does not contradict John .This enmity thing ,who says if you sin once ,you are not at emnity with the Devil ? Eve and all ot saints/believers were at enmity with the children of darkness,yet Eve and all her children were not perfect ,except for their justifying faith. Mary was also ,in line with the children Eve, of the light ,believers in the promise was also at emnity with the devil ,perfect or imperfect. Perhaps we differ with regeneration,the old man vs the new man ,whether there is imputed righteousness or not ,or whether we must be righteous acting always ,of course with God’s help, and when we sin who is really sinning ? St. Paul explains it all in his epistles. …Just reread ,but where is the prophecy that the virgin must also be immaculate ? Is that in Rev clothed -covered in the “Son” ?
Okay David you explain it to me. To be at emnity with someone is to be at a perpetual war. To be completely at odds with someone.

Now how could Eve be at completely at odds with the devil when she listened to him, and obeyed him and sinned against God? You explain that to me.
 
Genesis 3;15" And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed". Eve sinned. She was separated from God . She hid. God shed blood of an animal and “covered” her and recocnciled the relationship, but with consequences. Her sin was forgiven-her original sin was forgiven.She was not spiritually dead. From Eve would come children of the light, carriers of the Promise, at odds with the devil .From her would also come children of darkness, children of the devil. Where do get that to be an enemy of the devil you must be perfect ?..
David do you even know why God threw Eve out of the Garden of Eden? You think its because she sinned?:confused:

David lets go over this again, Okay. God asked Adam and Eve why are you hiding? Did they say I am SO SORRY GOD we sinned against you. If they did I would LOVE to see that.

But no first Eve blamed the Devil, she said the Devil made me do it. Then Adam said Eve made me do it, then when that did not work he turned it around and blamed GOD!:eek:

He did, Go back and read it, He said if you would not have given that women to me, this would never have happened!!

Sorry David but where were you exactly when you learned this Catholic teaching? Did you not say you were raised Catholic:confused:. What happend this was first grade either Religion class or Sunday School.

But lets re-group here David.

Let me give you a heads up. Adam and Eve were not thrown out of the Garden of Eden for their sin, They were thrown out because they DID NOT REPENT!!

Where did you hear, Forgive me Father I have sinned against you? You never did. All you heard was blame on everyone else, even God.

SO now that we got that straight lets move on.

How was there emnity between the devil and Eve when Eve obeyed the devil? Where did she hate him and his evil ways and stay clear from him and not sin?

Where was there emnity between the Blessed Mother and the devil? Simple she was made perfect by God, just like Eve was by the way before she had original sin, but the Blessed Mother kept her hate for sin and the ways of the devil.

Now scripture will back me up, Where is your proof for what you are saying?
 
Good .We admit there was a cleansing ,but it was more faith in the foresahdow of the final “Sacrifice”, foretold right there in the Garden. It eliminated some of the consequences,not all as you state .Abraham had to wait for Calvary to actually take place,but he was as righteous before as after justice was carried out(Calvary). He was certainly justified ,saved, righteous before God before Calvary. Hebrews 11:7 Noah…became heir of the righteousness which is by faith". Gen15:6"-And he (Abraham) believed in the Lord, and He counted it to him for righteousness." By him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses " Acts13:29. Zech3;4 “Behold , I have caused thine inequity to pass from thee and i will clothe thee with raiment"Isa 61:10 “My soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with the robe of righteousness…” Romans 3;28 " we are justified by faith without the deeds of the law” Rom 4:5" But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness .Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth the righteousness without works. Saying, blessed are they whose inequities are forgiven and whose sins are covered" …Again we are all saying Mary is also blessed . I just say it is in the above fashion- which is good old and new testament saints. She did not need the immaculate conception to be cleansed,forgiven, righteous, blessed and full of grace.
David you have me lost here. Where does righteous have to do with being sinless. Why did Jesus go into hades to release the righteous souls if they had no original sin? If they were righteous by God why did Jesus have to also die for them also?

So let me get this right, The whole O.T. showed how Jesus would come for the sins of all men, You said it yourself. But now you are saying he didn’t? Explain?:confused:

That they were justified by thier faith, Correct? Is that not what you said? Then why do any of us need a Savior, if we are justified by our faith? You really go me lost here?

When does being righteous or justified by our faith, make us free from Original sin, and not need a Savior?

Even the Blessed Mother was justified by her faith, righteous, but still needed a Savoir. She was saved by God at the moment of her conception so she was never touched by original sin.

But you are saying Job, etc, did not need a Savior but the Mother of God did? You really have me lost here, now more then ever.
 
Thank-you .That is a lot of work .Good quotes .Never said IC is a modern teaching . It is a modern doctrine required to be believed(1854) .Big difference between a teaching , an opinion, and a infallible Papal decree/doctrine requiring your obedience .I agreed that good Catholics have argued both ways for centuries. OK ?
No it is not okay nor accurate. It was always believed. It was not made doctrine until it was questioned. It was always believed by the Early Fathers of the Church and by the Faithful.

It became Church doctrine in 1854 by Pope Pius 1X in Ineffablis Deus.
 
Thank-you .That is a lot of work .Good quotes .Never said IC is a modern teaching . It is a modern doctrine required to be believed(1854) .Big difference between a teaching , an opinion, and a infallible Papal decree/doctrine requiring your obedience .I agreed that good Catholics have argued both ways for centuries. OK ?
Patavium, that was absolutely beautiful!!!👍 David, just want to point out the fact that yes, there may have been debates on the issues but they remained united, for centuries btw, up to this day. That, I believe should be our main goal here, is to work towards the idea of becoming united again as the One True Church established by Jesus. I believe that somehow, we should be able to resolve these issues with our brothers and sisters who have broke from the church, in order to become more effective as one united front against our true enemy and once and for all end all this infighting amongst eachother which can only make us weaker. It can only be from our enemy to wish for us to remain distracted and divided by these issues. It is imperative we find a way to unite in my view, and soon!
 
What?:eek: She was not spiritually dead with original sin? Then what she received instant physical death? I don’t think so david, you better go back and read that again.

It does not say that at all. It said a Woman would COME who would not listen to the devil and be at odds with him. How can Eve be at odds with the devil when she gave into him and participated in sin?:confused:

It was the Blessed Mother who was to come. Come on david, since when did Eve have SEED? You might want to rethink this one alot.

Also where I got to put emnity between the devil and oneself is to not sin. To not give into him. God would not let the devil TOUCH the Blessed Mother. Thats means he could not even tempt her to sin.

And when you have never sinned you are PERFECT in the full grace of God. Where do you get if you do not sin you are not perfect:shrug:
Never said she did not suffer spiritually with original sin .She did,She hid from God Are you kidding .That is like hiding from the most marvelous person ,experience ever .She was spiritually dead .but for how long ? I say until God spilled blood and covered her and spoke to her and recociled .Not hard to believe .How long were you dead ? 7-8 days and then were baptized ?
 
David do you even know why God threw Eve out of the Garden of Eden? You think its because she sinned?:confused:
You should know that there is forgiveness and Consequences.The consequences remained(is not this partly foundational for Purgatory doctrine) God could not undo the knowledge gained by Adam .God took mercy even grace upon them and forgave them ,covered them shed blood in forshadow of Calvary.You think they were unforgiven ,are in hell ?
Sorry David but where were you exactly when you learned this Catholic teaching?
What teaching ,that without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins ?
Let me give you a heads up. Adam and Eve were not thrown out of the Garden of Eden for their sin, They were thrown out because they DID NOT REPENT!!
Disagree. Think consequences. Did you(we) not repent ,will be(are) saved by the blood , yet you(we) shall surely die -consequences even though you(we) repented
.How was there emnity between the devil and Eve when Eve obeyed the devil? Where did she hate him and his evil ways and stay clear from him and not sin? Now scripture will back me up"
I will put emnity between thee and the woman" (Eve).Kinda straight forward in my humble opinion. Scripture.
 
Very nice .So now perfect Love is imputed to you thru Mary ? Didn’t you know imputing is a protestant thing ? But no, imputation is good, especially righteousness. In an earlier thread imputed righteousness is not proper theology per some Catholics. Thank-you
Perfect love is imputed to us all through Mary in the living word which she alone could give birth to, and Mary herself imputes her love which is the love of God as the best of all Mothers does for all her children. Think a little more deeply about v49 of The Canticle of Mary; The Mighty One has done great things for me and Holy is His Name. If you can’t fit any part of your salvation which you have or hope to have into any of those things she proclaims in vss. 50-55 then she has not imputed anything to you,

I have some slight personal experience with v49 it means that not only did God do great things in Mary personally but that He did and does great things for her that she asks of Him for others Jn.ch2v3 .
 
Perfect love is imputed to us all through Mary in the living word which she alone could give birth to, and Mary herself imputes her love which is the love of God as the best of all Mothers does for all her children. Think a little more deeply about v49 of The Canticle of Mary; The Mighty One has done great things for me and Holy is His Name. If you can’t fit any part of your salvation which you have or hope to have into any of those things she proclaims in vss. 50-55 then she has not imputed anything to you,

I have some slight personal experience with v49 it means that not only did God do great things in Mary personally but that He did and does great things for her that she asks of Him for others Jn.ch2v3 .
Ok thanks .Perhaps you would know , what is being proposed for further honoring Mary ,that is requests being made to the Vatican for further declarations. .Heard something about it on Catholic Radio.
 
Okay David you explain it to me. To be at emnity with someone is to be at a perpetual war. To be completely at odds with someone.

Now how could Eve be at completely at odds with the devil when she listened to him, and obeyed him and sinned against God? You explain that to me.
When was it prophesied by the Lord Himself of this emnity ? Wast not after the sin ? Can’t explain it but there it is. Furthermore, do we have any evidence that she sinned after the prophecy ? Don’t think so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top