Protestants, why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter enickman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Xian,

The Apostles are not the only authors in the Bible. This sounds good. Ok, guys, we know we are going to die and what we are going to do is write this stuff down…I Peter will do this…Paul you take this…now don’t forget to put all your names in their so everyone knows who wrote what…we are going to need an easy reading guide for the future generations for all the important stuff that people need to follow. This will make it easy for each generation to come to the same understanding…got it:thumbsup:
One question I’ve been asking is why didn’t they all get together and write one neatly organized book with a separate section on each topic. Something like:

Ch. 1 - Trinity
Ch. 2 - salvation
Ch. 3 - faith
Ch. 4 - baptism
Ch. 5 - repentance
Ch. 6 - Eucharist

Then everyone would know what to believe.
 
I went to non-denominational churches for years. I got confused after hearing all kinds of different beliefs and then learned about what Catholics really belief (instead of the lies I was taught in church) so I decided to study the Bible, Catholicism, and the early church fathers. I’m trying to figure out what Jesus and the apostles really taught and whether the Catholic Church is the one Jesus established.
That certainly seems reasonable and understandable. 👍
 
One question I’ve been asking is why didn’t they all get together and write one neatly organized book with a separate section on each topic. Something like:

Ch. 1 - Trinity
Ch. 2 - salvation
Ch. 3 - faith
Ch. 4 - baptism
Ch. 5 - repentance
Ch. 6 - Eucharist

Then everyone would know what to believe.
When you say “all” are you referring to the apostles or their successors?
 
So, on the one hand you boast that you call yourselves Christians because scripture says there should be “no divisions among you” BUT THEN…

There should be no divisions, and yet you divide? How do you reconcile that response in light of 1 Cor 1:10?

:doh2:
There is no division. There is only one group of Christians made up of everyone who follows the Bible. Everyone who follows something other than the Bible isn’t a Christian.

That isn’t exactly what I believe now but it was what I was taught and believed for awhile.
 
He was not one of the 12, but he did view himself as an apostle:

Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, according to the promise of life that is in Christ Jesus…2 Timothy 1

Paul, called to be an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and our brother Sosthenes… 1 Corinthians 1

Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, To the church of God in Corinth, together with all the saints throughout Achaia…2 Corinthians 1

Of course he didn’t see himself as worthy:

For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.
Yes, I meant “not one of the Twelve.”
 
As a former sola scriptura advocate, not going beyond what is written, I would have to ask you: where in scripture does it tell sola scriptura advocates, that the apostles wrote everything down that was important and included it in the Bible for Christians to follow after the apostles passed away? :confused:

2 Tim. 3 tells us that all scripture is inspired…Not only scripture…
If we needed to know more than the Bible for salvation, the Bible wouldn’t say “Do not go beyond what is written.” The fact that it says not to go beyond what is written implies that everything necessary for salvation was included.

How do you interpret, “Do not go beyond what is written.”?
 
There is no division. There is only one group of Christians made up of everyone who follows the Bible. Everyone who follows something other than the Bible isn’t a Christian.

That isn’t exactly what I believe now but it was what I was taught and believed for awhile.
I agree in the sense that all Christians are united regarding the faith that Jesus is our Savior. Doctrinally speaking, (teachings found in the bible) Christendom is definitely divided, as I am sure you would agree?
 
When you say “all” are you referring to the apostles or their successors?
The original apostles. Why didn’t they write everything down clearly? Why didn’t they write something similar to the Catholic Catechism so there wouldn’t be any confusion?
 
If we needed to know more than the Bible for salvation, the Bible wouldn’t say “Do not go beyond what is written.” The fact that it says not to go beyond what is written implies that everything necessary for salvation was included.

How do you interpret, “Do not go beyond what is written.”?
Ok…🙂 Again, as a former sola scriptura advocate, not going beyond what is written, I would have to ask you: where in scripture does it tell sola scriptura advocates, that the apostles wrote everything down that was important and included it in the Bible for Christians to follow after the apostles passed away?

2 Tim. 3 tells us that all scripture is inspired…Not only scripture…
 
There is no division. There is only one group of Christians made up of everyone who follows the Bible. Everyone who follows something other than the Bible isn’t a Christian.
Catholics, Lutherans, Anglicans, etc., all follow the bible. Did it not strike you as peculiar that some non-denominational “bible-believing” pastors claimed to have the authority to divide Christians into “those who follow the bible” and “those who don’t” when no scripture exists to bestow these pastors with such exceptional authority?

Next time someone claims to possess such knowledge, ask them: “By what authority?”
That isn’t exactly what I believe now but it was what I was taught and believed for awhile.
Great news, because you have been deceived. Who is the father of lies? (See John 8:44).
 
I agree in the sense that all Christians are united regarding the faith that Jesus is our Savior. Doctrinally speaking, (teachings found in the bible) Christendom is definitely divided, as I am sure you would agree?
I agree now. The church I first attended where I learned about Jesus taught that ALL denominations were unbiblical. I was told that basically all Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterians, etc. were false Christians who were going to Hell and that only those who follow the Bible instead of a denomination and only those who believe God is one person (modalism) are going to Heaven. After I moved, I couldn’t find anyone who agreed with that so I suspected that what I was taught was wrong. I went to probably 20 other non-denominational churches and they taught a variety of beliefs that contradicted each other. So you can see how I became confused and why I’m interested in the Catholic Church.
 
The original apostles. Why didn’t they write everything down clearly? Why didn’t they write something similar to the Catholic Catechism so there wouldn’t be any confusion?
During the apostolic era, the normal mode of teaching, I think, would have been accomplished via oral communication for the simple fact that very few people would have been able to read back then, but you do make a good point regarding a 1st century catechism. It was called the Didache and it came somewhat close:

earlychristianwritings.com/text/didache-roberts.html
 
During the apostolic era, the normal mode of teaching, I think, would have been accomplished via oral communication for the simple fact that very few people would have been able to read back then, but you do make a good point regarding a 1st century catechism. It was called the Didache and it came somewhat close:

earlychristianwritings.com/text/didache-roberts.html
That’s a good point. I have a computer program that has the Didache but it is listed under “Fathers of the Third and Fourth Centuries.” I think the date and authors of it are disputed.

One reason I asked is because I have Muslim friends and Muslims are taught that the Christians changed and corrupted the teaching of the apostles so God sent Mohammad to deliver the Quran to correct everything. That’s a big reason why I have to read the ECFs to see if there is consistent teaching.
 
I agree now. The church I first attended where I learned about Jesus taught that ALL denominations were unbiblical. I was told that basically all Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterians, etc. were false Christians who were going to Hell and that only those who follow the Bible instead of a denomination and only those who believe God is one person (modalism) are going to Heaven. After I moved, I couldn’t find anyone who agreed with that so I suspected that what I was taught was wrong. I went to probably 20 other non-denominational churches and they taught a variety of beliefs that contradicted each other. So you can see how I became confused and why I’m interested in the Catholic Church.
As a former non-catholic I can totally relate, which was why, as a former protestant, I set out to find the historical church that began on Pentecost and had Jesus as it’s founder. Historically, the only two churches that can trace their lineage back to the apostolic age, was the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church, so my choices were reduced considerably, which made my selection a lot easier. Obviously I think you are on the right path. Of course, my conversion didn’t happen over night. 👍
 
XianThinker;9676224]That’s a good point. I have a computer program that has the Didache but it is listed under “Fathers of the Third and Fourth Centuries.” I think the date and authors of it are disputed.
You are right. Some say the latter part of the 1st century while others suggest the 4th century.
One reason I asked is because I have Muslim friends and Muslims are taught that the Christians changed and corrupted the teaching of the apostles so God sent Mohammad to deliver the Quran to correct everything. That’s a big reason why I have to read the ECFs to see if there is consistent teaching.
The ECFs were critical to my conversion. Soak up as much as you can…👍
 
I went to non-denominational churches for years. I got confused after hearing all kinds of different beliefs and then learned about what Catholics really belief (instead of the lies I was taught in church) so I decided to study the Bible, Catholicism, and the early church fathers. I’m trying to figure out what Jesus and the apostles really taught and whether the Catholic Church is the one Jesus established.
Well then we are obligated to help you, in all charity, on your journey of discernment!
 
There is no division. There is only one group of Christians made up of everyone who follows the Bible. Everyone who follows something other than the Bible isn’t a Christian.
But not everyone that “follows the Bible” is truly Christian …
 
One question I’ve been asking is why didn’t they all get together and write one neatly organized book with a separate section on each topic. Something like:

Ch. 1 - Trinity
Ch. 2 - salvation
Ch. 3 - faith
Ch. 4 - baptism
Ch. 5 - repentance
Ch. 6 - Eucharist

Then everyone would know what to believe.
That would have been nice, but that is not what Christ commanded. He made them “fishers of men”, and their primary mission was to spread the Gospel - the Good News. They were not asked to write it down first.

Yet, even if they did, it is all but certain that there would be splinter groups and factions based on interpretation of the written accounts.

Christ, by becoming man, knew the hearts of men - He understood that faith must come first, and the earliest Christians came to know Christ through faith in the witness of others.

Think of how miraculous that was by imagining that same message being preached today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top