Prove Apostolic Succession

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vic2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
V

Vic2

Guest
How can we show apostolic succession from the apostles to the present time? A Protestant friend of mine would consider the Catholic Church if he could document authority passed on from the apostles to the present time. Are there any sources that show us the lineage of apostolic succession throughout time?
 
“And thus preaching through countries and cities, they appointed the first-fruits [of their labours], having first proved them by the Spirit, to be bishops and deacons of those who should afterwards believe. Nor was this any new thing, since indeed many ages before it was written concerning bishops and deacons. For thus saith the Scripture a certain place, ‘I will appoint their bishops s in righteousness, and their deacons in faith.’… **Our apostles also knew, through our Lord Jesus Christ, and there would be strife on account of the office of the episcopate. For this reason, therefore, inasmuch as they had obtained a perfect fore-knowledge of this, they appointed those [ministers] already mentioned, and afterwards gave instructions, that when these should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed them in their ministry…**For our sin will not be small, if we eject from the episcopate those who have blamelessly and holily fulfilled its duties.” Pope Clement, Epistle to Corinthians, 42, 44 (A.D. 95).

Just sixty years after the Resurrection.
 
How can we show apostolic succession from the apostles to the present time? A Protestant friend of mine would consider the Catholic Church if he could document authority passed on from the apostles to the present time. Are there any sources that show us the lineage of apostolic succession throughout time?
There are four generations of apostolic succession described in 2 Tim 2:2:
And what you heard from me through many witnesses entrust to faithful people who will have the ability to teach others as well.
Paul → Timothy → those he entrusts (via imposition of hands) → those they entrust

But, I suspect your friend is looking for something more along the lines of the following:
catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bratz.html (Pope Benedict’s Apostolic Succession)
mysite.verizon.net/res7gdmc/index.html
 
  1. Well if apostolic succession is what he bases his beliefs on, there is no way he should be protestant.
  2. Here is the list of Popes going back to St. Peter:
  1. Correct.
  2. Fine, but apostolic succession does not have so much to do with popes as with bishops.
As the second previous post indicates, the succession of bishops in the early Church is well-documented. Since then, there’s no way that that succession could be lost except by every bishop dying with no succeeding bishops consecrated, which did not happen, or with the consecration of bishops at some point becoming invalid, which did not happen either except in heretical and/or schismatic sects.

The papacy in certain times past lay vacant or in dispute for considerable periods - that in no way broke the chain of episcopal succession.
 
You would have to do a little work, but you can start with Irenaeus giving lists of bishops in Book 3, Chapter 3 of Against Heresies. And I know Eusebius in his Church History, book V, chapt. 6 gives lists that take you a couple centuries later. Augustine takes you farther a century or two later in Letter 53, 1.2. And if you can find others in the latter first millennium, middle ages, and modern era, you can piece it together with representation from different eras.

If your friend is obstinate, he will try to find imperfections in the lists (like maybe the order is slightly different for a particular bishopric). Or he might just say he doesn’t trust the lists. If the early ones were wrong so then would the later ones be.

His bigger challenge is to find serious opposition in the early centuries to those who WERE claiming Apostolic Succession. The Clement quote in JustaServant’s post shows that this concept was known in the first century. Incidentally, this Clement is recorded by history to have been the same fellow coworker with Paul mentioned in Philippians 4:3. And the concept is of course Scriptural, even going back to the succession in the priesthood of the OT. So you know succession exists.

The Catholic Encyclopedia lists sources too if you wanted to check them one by one for a list of Roman bishops throughout the centuries.
 
  1. Correct.
  2. Fine, but apostolic succession does not have so much to do with popes as with bishops.
As the second previous post indicates, the succession of bishops in the early Church is well-documented. Since then, there’s no way that that succession could be lost except by every bishop dying with no succeeding bishops consecrated, which did not happen, or with the consecration of bishops at some point becoming invalid, which did not happen either except in heretical and/or schismatic sects.

The papacy in certain times past lay vacant or in dispute for considerable periods - that in no way broke the chain of episcopal succession.
The Pope is a Bishop. 🙂
 
How can we show apostolic succession from the apostles to the present time? A Protestant friend of mine would consider the Catholic Church if he could document authority passed on from the apostles to the present time. Are there any sources that show us the lineage of apostolic succession throughout time?
Apostolic Succession Proved from Scripture and History

Many people deny that the successors of Peter and the Apostles had Apostolic Authority because they believe that the idea of “Apostolic Succession” is not found in the Bible. Is this really true?

In fact, the Bible clearly reveals that the Apostle Paul taught Apostolic Succession to his disciples and fellow workers, Timothy, Titus and Clement. Here are the relevant passages:

2 Timothy 2:1-2
You then, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus. And the things you have heard me say in the presence of many witnesses entrust to reliable men who will also be qualified to teach others.

In the passage above, there are four generations of believers contained in this one passage: 1. Paul himself, 2. Timothy, who was Paul’s disciple, 3. Those whom Timothy would disciple, and 4. Those to whom Timothy’s disciples would preach. Paul commanded Timothy to hand on the gospel and to ensure that those men also passed on the gospel reliably.

Titus 1:5
The reason I left you in Crete was that you might straighten out what was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town, as I directed you.

In the passage above, we see that Paul was not only concerned with the handing on of the gospel message but with the appointing of leaders in the Cretan church, as well.

Philippians 4:3
Yes, and I ask you, loyal yokefellow, help these women who have contended at my side in the cause of the gospel, along with Clement and the rest of my fellow workers, whose names are in the book of life.

In the Letter to the Philippians, Paul mentions one of his “fellow workers”, Clement. Clement was ordained by the Apostle Peter and later became the fourth Bishop of Rome (after Peter, Linus, and Anacletus). Later, Clement wrote his own Letter to the Corinthians, and in that letter, Clement stated:

“Through countryside and city [the apostles] preached, and they appointed their earliest converts, testing them by the Spirit, to be the bishops and deacons of future believers. Nor was this a novelty, for bishops and deacons had been written about a long time earlier. . . . Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of bishop. For this reason, therefore, having received perfect foreknowledge, they appointed those who have already been mentioned and afterwards added the further provision that, if they should die, other approved men should succeed to their ministry” (*Letter to the Corinthians *42:4–5, 44:1–3 [A.D. 80]).

“We are of opinion, therefore, that those appointed by them, or afterwards by other eminent men, with the consent of the whole church, and who have blamelessly served the flock of Christ, in a humble, peaceable, and disinterested spirit, and have for a long time possessed the good opinion of all, cannot be justly dismissed from the ministry. (ibid.)

From these two passages, we can see that Clement had witnessed his mentors, the Apostles Peter and Paul, not only naming men to the office of Bishop but he had also received their instructions that other men should succeed the Bishops appointed by the Apostles in the event that these first Bishops should die. Thus, history records that Clement, Timothy and Titus followed the pattern of appointing successors to the Apostles just as the Apostles had directed them to do.

While many seem to believe that anyone with a Bible may become a “pastor” by simply gathering around himself a group of fellow believers to form a church, the Bible itself teaches that true leaders in the Church of Jesus Christ must be ordained by those who were ordained before them. This process, known as Apostolic Succession, maintains an unbroken chain of continuity from Jesus, Peter and the Apostles down to the present day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top