I
II_Paradox_II
Guest
Count Chocula:
We all accept certain premises without evidence (such as the reliability of our senses), then we build on these with experience, either affirming or contradicting our foundational premises and prior experience. Get enough contradictory evidence, you will “convert” your mode of thinking and accept a new perspective and the process of either confirming or contradicting continues.
ken
These types of arguments really don’t go anywhere. Ultimately everyone is left in the exact same place of inferring the most likely explanation from the evidence and experiences at hand. Even the supposed “spiral argument” is nothing but this - a plain old inductive argument from experience to conclusion.They then attest that the Bible is true because they say it is. This “circular logic” can be attributed to pretty much any religion with anything that is scriptural.
We all accept certain premises without evidence (such as the reliability of our senses), then we build on these with experience, either affirming or contradicting our foundational premises and prior experience. Get enough contradictory evidence, you will “convert” your mode of thinking and accept a new perspective and the process of either confirming or contradicting continues.
ken