N
Nov1411
Guest
I was just wondering why it goes from verse 24 to verse 35, then to verse 25? I thought it might have been a typo, but I found that in 3 different Bibles. Is there a reason for this?
Interesting. So if I were writing down chapter 3, would I write verse 35 after verse 24 or after verse 34?In the Preface to the New American Bible: Old Testament it says:
In some instances in the Book of Job, in Proverbs, Sirach, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Amos, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, and Zechariah there is good reason to believe that the original order of lines was accidentally disturbed in the transmission of the text. The verse numbers given in such cases are always those of the current Hebrew text, though the arrangement differs. In these instances the textual notes advise the reader of the difficulty. Cases of exceptional dislocation are called to the reader’s attention by footnotes.
Unfortunately, in this case, there is no textual note nor footnote to explain specifically why verse 35 was relocated between verse 24 and verse 25.
Apparently, either place is acceptable. The English-language New American Bible at vatican.va has it after verse 24 and the Latin-language Nova Vulgata at vatican.va has it after verse 34.Interesting. So if I were writing down chapter 3, would I write verse 35 after verse 24 or after verse 34?
The recently released NAB Revised Edition (2011) does not make this change. It goes from verse 24 to 25, through 35, with no changing of order.I was just wondering why it goes from verse 24 to verse 35, then to verse 25? I thought it might have been a typo, but I found that in 3 different Bibles. Is there a reason for this?
That’s interesting. Thanks!Apparently, either place is acceptable. The English-language New American Bible at vatican.va has it after verse 24 and the Latin-language Nova Vulgata at vatican.va has it after verse 34.
Cool, thanks!The recently released NAB Revised Edition (2011) does not make this change. It goes from verse 24 to 25, through 35, with no changing of order.