Feser is, I’m sure, great for people who want to entrench their established preconceptions or convinced by his antecedent theories.
Comparing analytic logical entailment like addition to something so hotly contested as natural law is so… pop philosophy. And nigh unto ridiculous. A lowerclassman could bang out ten pages contra Feser using this as the prompt without any trouble.
Which is odd because I know with all sincerity Feser could absolutely bury me in philosophy without flinching.
