W
Welshrabbit
Guest
I pay $11,000/yr. for my two kids now. That’s going to go up to $27,000/yr. for both when they’re in high school. It ain’t cheap!
It would be a cold day in hell before I let any organizaton dictate to me where my child was to be educated.I disagree. I certainly do not think it’s up to us to decide if a particular canon is necessary or not. It’s the Church law, we obey.
What other laws of the church do you feel can be ignored because they are “not necessary”?
The principles themselves, probably not. It’s most likely a board level decision, unless they have a prior declaration already in play for the principal.I wonder if principals have any flexibility
I would reword this slightly and say “if you want the Church’s help in the religious formation for your kids”.If it is your plan to go to Mass on Sunday and want the Church to do the religious training for your kids, then, choose a parish school.
This was me until I started taking my faith seriously and actually living it (or at least trying my hardest to). This is also the case for many of my close friends as well.Other families who are not comfortable or who feel unequipped want to drop their kids off, pick them up, and let the school do the heavy lifting of Rel Ed.
Our kids responded better to this. The last thing they wanted to do was homework with Mom. They did much better going to the church for 45 min an afternoon after school with their friends.and let the school do the heavy lifting of Rel Ed.
No that is not the bottom line.So, then, is the bottom line that, while it isn’t a sin to send kids to public school if one can’t send them to Catholic school, it is a sin to do so if one has the ability, even if one has other reasons for not doing so?