Public Welfare vs. Seventh Commandment

  • Thread starter Thread starter rjseyko
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How does the Church officially reconcile its support for public welfare programs (funded through the forcible taking of private property) with the Seventh Commandment (Thou Shalt Not Take Someone’s Private Property) ?
One has to pay taxes. Property taxes. When one has a job, they pay federal and state taxes. The paying of these taxes is compulsory. Whether one pays along the year, or owe when they file their tax return, they are paying taxes. Sales tax when one goes grocery shopping or shopping online.

As others have said, roads are paid for with taxes. Public schools are paid for with taxes. Street lights and signs are paid for with taxes. Snow plowing the roads (if you live where it snows), trash pick up (in some areas), recycling, fire department, etc.

Unless someone has their own self-sustaining property and doesn’t need any of the above, then they don’t need to worry about using anything that is paid for with tax money. I think for the vast majority of us, it is hard not to. One drives on roads, reads street signs, etc.

As Jesus said, some taxes are appropriate.
 
Another issue I have with some of the arguments I’m encountering is the following: those who argue for taxation are committing the fallacy of arguing that because some taxes are appropriate, all taxes are appropriate. Surely posters will admit the following: some taxes are not appropriate.

If that’s true…which ones? Or which levels? Or, alternatively, do posters think that “whatever taxes the government assesses are appropriate and must be paid?”
 
My premise is not flawed at all. Regardless of what it’s used for, taxation is still theft. But you answered my question. If the Church believes taxation is not theft, then there is nothing to reconcile. And as far as the “Give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s,” I just don’t agree with it. We owe Caesar nothing. But what right is Caesar entitled to my property? Caesar has the power, but not the right.
Well, to be fair… maintaining and building roads is not free and Cops and Soldiers will not work for free. You do like the idea of your country having soldiers so other nations will think twice before invading and possibly killing you, right? Therefore, there has to be taxes. Do I think the government taxes us too much…? I am a single middle class man… of course I think I am taxed too much lol. I get no tax breaks at all. I get taxed more than some peoples entire pay checks. Gross income, not net and they get welfare, food stamps and other assistance and I do not. But taxes are not going anywhere so it is something we just have to accept if we want to be part of society. Of you do not want to be taxed, live off the grid. If you do not want to be a part of your country where you are taxed, leave. If you owe Ceasar nothing but he is stealing from you (And believe me, sometimes I feel like he is stealing from me) the best you can do is keep your own side of the street clean and not steal back.
 
I’ll answer the question everyone else seems scared to: At some point, taxes do in fact become theft of private property. Heck, a good case can be made that many taxes today are nothing more than state-sanctioned theft. The example that springs to mind is estate taxes. Estate taxes are nothing more than legal robbing of the rich to give to the poor.

Further, the whole line of reasoning that says, “taxes pay for good things like the military, roads, and libraries,” is a complete red herring, and logically unpersuasive. Why? Because if that line of reasoning works, any theft of money becomes licit if the thief uses the money for some socially-desired use or project. Unfortunately for proponents of that, theft to fund good things is still theft.

I admit my amazement that actions that posters would condemn, if undertaken by a private actor, get a pass from posters (and society!) when done by the government.

Finally – a good thread on the moral theology forum! Thanks, OP!
Tell the government you would rater not get taxed and get rid of the military. Lets see how you would feel when another country invades and takes all you have and makes you join their military, if not kill you. 🤷 Or people ban together and we have a age of warlords fighting for control over their own nations with what was once your country.

For a nation to exist, there has to be taxes. God recognizes the authority of nations. Why else would The Bible say that everyone who is in a place of power was put there by God, so to obey the law of the land. That is way different from a single thief claiming to do good with the money he steals. And the law of the land is… YOU PAY TAXES. Yeah, some time we get unfairly taxed but Jesus never said “Render unto Ceaser what is Ceasers, unless you feel it is way too unfair”
 
Red herring, laughingboy: I acknowledge taxes are a necessity to some extent. However, at some point taxes rise to the level of theft.
 
Red herring, laughingboy: I acknowledge taxes are a necessity to some extent. However, at some point taxes rise to the level of theft.
I agree. But we still need them. So I guess my point is… accept it and stop complaining people. Not to you, Polarguy but people in general.
 
Red herring, laughingboy: I acknowledge taxes are a necessity to some extent. However, at some point taxes rise to the level of theft.
BTW, for somthing to be a Red Herring, it has to be irrelevant to the topic being discussed. Taxes used that we benefit from is not irrelevant to what is being talked about.
 
Tell the government you would rater not get taxed and get rid of the military. Lets see how you would feel when another country invades and takes all you have and makes you join their military, if not kill you. 🤷 Or people ban together and we have a age of warlords fighting for control over their own nations with what was once your country.

For a nation to exist, there has to be taxes. God recognizes the authority of nations. Why else would The Bible say that everyone who is in a place of power was put there by God, so to obey the law of the land. That is way different from a single thief claiming to do good with the money he steals. And the law of the land is… YOU PAY TAXES. Yeah, some time we get unfairly taxed but Jesus never said “Render unto Ceaser what is Ceasers, unless you feel it is way too unfair”
Which they actually were, in Jesus’ time. Tax collectors in those days were generally acknowledged to be thieves.
 
Red herring, laughingboy: I acknowledge taxes are a necessity to some extent. However, at some point taxes rise to the level of theft.
Of course, the point at which that happens is up for debate (a debate that probably will never be settled).
 
Thank you dmar.
You’re welcome!
The only thing more fun around here than a good thread, is a good thread civilly argued.
And the joke threads. J/k
I agree that some taxes are appropriate. Jesus said as much. The problem is: Where to draw the line? I admit I have no ready answer to that. Some answers leap to mind, which sadly are all conceptual:
–taxes become theft when they deter rational people from engaging in the taxed activity merely to avoid the tax (or the level of tax);
–taxes become theft when they are so burdensome that they prevent livelihood, or the transmission of one’s wealth to the next generation;
–taxes become theft when they require the taxed to sell their possessions to pay the tax.
This is all just off the top of my head. I’ll give it more thought.
Thank you for those reasons. I think the first one is circular. To me, it seems equivalent to saying: “Taxes are too much when rational people think they are too much.”

I think the Church Fathers can help us understand when taxes are too high. St. Lactantius indicates that Diocletian raised taxes too high. Chapter 7 of his book on persecution has these comments:

“there were…taxes on numberless commodities, and those [were] not only often repeated, but perpetual, and, in exacting them, intolerable wrongs [were committed].” source

And: “[Taxes] for the maintenance of the soldiery might have been endured; but Diocletian, through his insatiable avarice, would never allow the sums of money in his treasury to be diminished: he was constantly heaping [money] together…” source

And: “[By] various extortions he had made all things exceedingly [hard].” source

And: “men were afraid to expose anything to sale, and the scarcity became more excessive and grievous than ever, until, in the end, the ordinance, after having proved destructive to multitudes, was from mere necessity abrogated.” source

And: “[A] certain endless passion for building [haunted him], and on that account, endless exactions [were taken] from the provinces for furnishing wages to labourers and artificers, and supplying carriages and whatever else was requisite to the works which he projected. Here public halls, there a circus, here a mint, and there a workhouse for making implements of war; in one place a habitation for his empress, and in another for his daughter. … [This was] folly…” source

He also makes this comment that reminds me of the socialist tendencies of modern times:

“[Diocletian] maintain[ed] a much more considerable military force than any sole emperor had done in times past. There began to be fewer men who paid taxes than there were who received wages… the husbandmen [were so] exhausted by enormous impositions [that] the farms were abandoned, cultivated grounds became woodland, and universal dismay prevailed.” source

St. Ambrose praises a certain tax percentage on produce as reasonable:

“[Joseph] fixed [an] impost at a fifth of [the peoples’] produce, and thus showed himself clear-sighted in making provision for the future, and liberal in the tax he laid upon them. Never after did Egypt suffer from…a [terrible] famine.” source

Pope St. Gregory the Great has perhaps the most detailed treatment of taxes. As an example, read the paragraph at this link that has this phrase in it: “on some estates of the Church a most unjust exaction is practised.” I’m not sure what exactly his tax proposal was because some of the terms are unfamiliar to me. But he clearly says: “we desire you to draw up charters of security, to be signed by you, declaring that each person is to pay [a certain] amount [and no more].” And: “let them make a payment in gross amounting to seventy-two [units]: and let neither grains beyond the pound, nor an excessive pound, nor any further imposts beyond the pound, be exacted.” source

St. John Chrysostom notes some of the things that taxes are supposed to pay for: “the benefits done to states by the rulers [include] good order and peace…the soldiery, and those over the public business.” source And he asks: “[Why do] we pay tribute to a king? Is it not as providing for us? And yet we should not have paid it unless we had known in the first instance that we were gainers from [the government’s] superintendence. Yet it was for this that from of old all men came to an agreement that governors should be maintained by us” source
 
dmar, your last is one of the most informative posts I’ve read around here in quite some time. Thanks! I don’t really have much to add, as it’s rather all been said, but we need more threads like this one, and less “is X a mortal sin?”
 
dmar, your last is one of the most informative posts I’ve read around here in quite some time. Thanks! I don’t really have much to add, as it’s rather all been said, but we need more threads like this one, and less “is X a mortal sin?”
No problem, I’m glad this thread has covered some useful ground. I think the Church Fathers need to be further studied on this point. I’m sure the quotes I selected aren’t the only informative ones, and they can certainly help us by showing their experience. The one from St. Lactantius seems eerily similar to modern times, at least to me. So many of the things he describes match our current state of affairs.

If my understanding is correct, taxes can be theft sometimes, for example when they are too high, and too-high taxes are characterized by the kinds of problems mentioned in St. Lactantius’s text.
 
No problem, I’m glad this thread has covered some useful ground. I think the Church Fathers need to be further studied on this point. I’m sure the quotes I selected aren’t the only informative ones, and they can certainly help us by showing their experience. The one from St. Lactantius seems eerily similar to modern times, at least to me. So many of the things he describes match our current state of affairs.

If my understanding is correct, taxes can be theft sometimes, for example when they are too high, and too-high taxes are characterized by the kinds of problems mentioned in St. Lactantius’s text.
Right. Taxes are primarily theft when they prevent a person from being able to provide for his/her family. This actually is part of the reason for progressive taxation with regards to income taxes - for some people, paying 25% (for example) of their income to taxes is negligible, but for others, even paying 5% of their income to taxes creates a substantial hardship.

Regardless, taxes need to be paid to take care of things that only the government can take care of - things like proper defense, roads for transportation, etc. On the other hand, the government has a responsibility to use the funds that it has wisely and not spend more money than it has or to spend on items that could be more efficiently be taken care of on either a lower level of government (states and localities) or by the private sector. Why? Because if the government overspends (which it has done pretty much in every year since WWII except for the second term of the Clinton administration), somewhere down the line, people will be taxed exhorbitantly in order to pay back what is owed.
 
Right. Taxes are primarily theft when they prevent a person from being able to provide for his/her family. This actually is part of the reason for progressive taxation with regards to income taxes - for some people, paying 25% (for example) of their income to taxes is negligible, but for others, even paying 5% of their income to taxes creates a substantial hardship.

Regardless, taxes need to be paid to take care of things that only the government can take care of - things like proper defense, roads for transportation, etc. On the other hand, the government has a responsibility to use the funds that it has wisely and not spend more money than it has or to spend on items that could be more efficiently be taken care of on either a lower level of government (states and localities) or by the private sector. Why? Because if the government overspends (which it has done pretty much in every year since WWII except for the second term of the Clinton administration), somewhere down the line, people will be taxed exhorbitantly in order to pay back what is owed.
I agree. And the thing about it also is that even a low income family that cannot really afford to even lose a single penny to taxation can still get government benefits that are paid for by other people’s tax dollars, so it is not so black and white. Section 8 housing, food stamps, Wic, cash aid… all available to low income households. I know one woman who told me how she was getting a tax return back for more money than she even earned the whole year for some reason just because she had 2 kids. I wonder if she was telling the truth about that :confused:
 
A few comments:
  1. Taxation, in general, is not theft, but rather paying your share of the military, police, schools, etc., those things that contribute to the common good.
  2. Taxation could be theft, or at a minimum, immoral. The point where taxation stops being “taxation” and starts being “theft”, is debatable, but here is a overly simple example: Three people live in a town…one person makes $100,000 per year and the other two make $25,000 per year. If the two that make $25,000 per year vote to increase taxes to 100% on any income over $50,000, thus taking half of what one person makes, then I would call that theft.
  3. there are a few additional bullets from the Catechism that I think apply:
2427 Human work proceeds directly from persons created in the image of God and called to prolong the work of creation by subduing the earth, both with and for one another. Hence work is a duty: “If any one will not work, let him not eat.” Work honors the Creator’s gifts and the talents received from him. It can also be redemptive. By enduring the hardship of work in union with Jesus, the carpenter of Nazareth and the one crucified on Calvary, man collaborates in a certain fashion with the Son of God in his redemptive work. He shows himself to be a disciple of Christ by carrying the cross, daily, in the work he is called to accomplish. Work can be a means of sanctification and a way of animating earthly realities with the Spirit of Christ.

2429 Everyone has the right of economic initiative; everyone should make legitimate use of his talents to contribute to the abundance that will benefit all and to harvest the just fruits of his labor. He should seek to observe regulations issued by legitimate authority for the sake of the common good.

2432 Those responsible for business enterprises are responsible to society for the economic and ecological effects of their operations. They have an obligation to consider the good of persons and not only the increase of profits. Profits are necessary, however. They make possible the investments that ensure the future of a business and they guarantee employment.

2434 A just wage is the legitimate fruit of work. To refuse or withhold it can be a grave injustice. In determining fair pay both the needs and the contributions of each person must be taken into account. “Remuneration for work should guarantee man the opportunity to provide a dignified livelihood for himself and his family on the material, social, cultural and spiritual level, taking into account the role and the productivity of each, the state of the business, and the common good.” Agreement between the parties is not sufficient to justify morally the amount to be received in wages.​

The CCC makes the following points:
  1. 2427 implies taxes should be used to help those in need, but not the lazy
  2. 2429 says a person should be able to “harvest the just fruits of their labor”. I would argue any tax policy that takes more than half of one’s income is unjust. If you add up all the taxes a person could pay between city, county, school district, sales tax, state income, federal income taxes, payroll taxes, estate taxes, etc., many times it totals over 50% of some people’s income…that is unjust.
  3. I added 2432 to remind people that the CCC does not consider profit to be sinful, or evil. (Might be news to some people in the CAF)
  4. 2434 talks about a just wage. Obviously applies to the worker, but could also apply to the business owner as well. If the government taxes too much in taxes, it is unjust.
 
From what I understand, taxes are levied on the basis of the co-responsibility of the members of a society to provide for the common welfare of that society together with their submission to public authority. Public authority exists by the will of God for the common good of society and to direct the activity of the society towards that common good. In other words, individuals have the duty to contribute to the common welfare and public authority has the duty to direct and organize how this is done. Therefore, public authority can rightly levy taxes to spend on the common welfare. How these benefits are distributed once levied is a matter of distributive justice.

This is why the Catechism places tax evasion, not taxation, as a violation of the seventh commandment. The question is who’s conscience does it fall to–who sins–if taxes are distributed for unjust purposes: the tax payer, the tax spender, or both? I would say definitely the spender, but I don’t think the payer sins (the pagan emperors weren’t just doing good things with the taxes they collected, but Christ and the Apostles still said pay them).

As far as taxes supporting the poor, other than it being in general a matter of the common welfare that each person is supplied with all that is necessary for the exercise of his social functions, there is another consideration. Many of the Fathers frame support of the poor as an issue of justice and natural law (we do not have the right to retain what should be given to the poor, it is equivalent to theft, it is required by the principle of the universal destination of goods, etc.).
St. Robert Bellarmine:
The passages from the Fathers are chiefly these: St. Basil, in his Sermon to the Rich, thus speaks: “And thou, art thou not a robber, because what thou hast received to be given away, thou supposest to be thy own?” And a little farther he continues: “Wherefore, as much as thou art able to give, so much dost thou injure the poor.” And St. Ambrose, in his 81st Sermon, says: “What injustice do I commit, if, whilst I do not steal the goods of others, I keep diligently what is my own? impudent word! Dost thou say thy own? What is this? It is no less a crime to steal than it is not to give to the poor out of thy abundance.” St. Jerome thus writes in his Epistle to Hedibias: “If you possess more than is necessary for your subsistence, give it away, and thus you will be a creditor.” St. John Chrysostom says in his 34th Homily to the people of Antioch: “Do you possess anything of your own? The interest of the poor is entrusted to you, whether the estate is yours by your own just labours, or you have acquired it by inheritance.” St. Augustine, in his Tract on the 147th Psalm: “Our superfluous wealth belongs to the poor; when it is not given to them, we possess what we have no right to retain.” St. Leo thus speaks: “Temporal goods are given to us by the liberality of God, and He will demand an account of them, for they were committed to us for disposal as well as possession.”

And St. Gregory, in the third part of his Pastoral Care: “Those are to be admonished, who, whilst they desire not the goods of others, do not distribute their own; that so they may carefully remember, that as the common origin of all men is from the earth, so also its produce is common to them all: in vain, then, they think themselves innocent, who appropriate to themselves the common gifts of God.” St. Bernard, in his Epistle to Henry, archbishop of Sens, saith: “It is ours, for the poor cry out for what you squander; you cruelly take away from us what you spend foolishly.” St. Thomas also writes: “The superfluous riches which many possess, by the natural law belong to the support of the poor”; and again: “The Lord requires us to give to the poor not only the tenth part, but all of our superfluous wealth.”
If it is a matter of justice, it would seem a legitimate function of public authority to transfer goods that one person “has no right to retain” to those to whom it “by the natural law belong.”
 
Hmmm…sorry, I think the issue is more complex than some are making it appear.

Although the whole “render unto Caesar…” position is valid to some extent, what happens when taxes reach confiscatory levels? And that’s not a hypothetical worry, either: People forget that as recently as the 1950s, income taxes sometimes exceeded 90% of income, and my school district in 2016 funds tennis courts, a world-wrestling-federation-quality light system, etc., for the local school, at the expense of soaking businesses who are fleeing the town. Some posts here make it look like “all taxes are OK,” for no other reason than because posters personally think the tax usage is reasonable.
I don’t think income taxes exceeded 90% of income. The top marginal rate could exceed 90%, that’s true. But not the overall tax rate.
 
Is it not the case people get something in return for tax - at least on some occasions?

I know countries differ but do taxes fund such things as; the police, the courts, prisons, water, roads, schools, having bins collected?

So, we get something back for our taxes. Alternatively it can be said we pay for certain things via tax. In which case it’s not stealing.

Misappropriation of taxes could be counted as stealing (or at least fraud).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top