H
hurst
Guest
I don’t think you understood what I meant. What Jesus said admits of the possibility of sins being forgiven in the next life by specifying a kind that isn’t.Think about what you are saying here, Hurst, ie, if one admits the possibility…then indirect support can be found.Originally Posted by Hurst
It is, indirectly, by admitting the possibility of a purification in the other world.
Matthew 12:32 And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but he that shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the world to come.
I had to look that term up.That is eisegetical reasoning.
Exegetical inquiry means that we attempt to “read out of” scripture the original meaning intended, while eisegetical inquiry means “reading into” scripture a meaning which may not have been intended by the author.
From WordNet 2.0 :
Eisegesis : (noun)
1: personal interpretation of a text (especially of the Bible) using your own ideas
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary:
: the interpretation of a text (as of the Bible) by reading into it one’s own ideas
I don’t think an interpretation is inserted here. That He says “nor in the world to come” gives rise to the consideration that in the world to come, there may in fact be other sins that will be forgiven. Otherwise, He would not need to have ever mentioned it, if sins can only be forgiven in this world. Maccabb
I agree that it says nothing explicitly about purgatory. But yes, it does say something about forgiveness after death.I strongly disagree with you. That verse says nothing about purgatory, nor does it say anything about forgiveness after death, and is refuted by Hebrews 9:27.
As for the verse you quoted:
Hebrews 9:26 For then he ought to have suffered often from the beginning of the world: but now once at the end of ages, he hath appeared for the destruction of sin, by the sacrifice of himself. 27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, and after this the judgment: 28 So also Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of many; the second time he shall appear without sin to them that expect him unto salvation.
I do not see how receiving the judgment after death refutes purgatory. In fact, the judgment after death is not the only judgment. There is another judgment on the Last Day, pertaining to the resurrection.
1 Corinthians 15:52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall rise again incorruptible: and we shall be changed.
Matthew 10:15 Amen I say to you, it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
Luke 11:31 The queen of the south shall rise in the judgment with the men of this generation, and shall condemn them: because she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and behold more than Solomon here.
Romans 14:10 But thou, why judgest thou thy brother? or thou, why dost thou despise thy brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.
Jude 1:6 And the angels who kept not their principality, but forsook their own habitation, he hath reserved under darkness in everlasting chains, unto the judgment of the great day.
One thing to remark here is that the devils, who have already been judged, are yet being held unto the Day of Judgment.
Likewise, the saints are not yet resurrected in general, for the Day of Resurrection is not yet here for all.
So the judgment rendered at death, while determining one’s final destiny (Heaven or Hell), nevertheless leaves one in an intermediate state until the Day of Judgment / Resurrection.
The notion of Purgatory is not contrary to this.
hurst