Purgatory and 1 Corinthians 3:10-15

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dimmesdale
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Dimmesdale

Guest
Hello all,

I’m having trouble understanding this passage in relation to the doctrine of Purgatory.

1 Cor. 3:10-15

“According to the grace of God which was given to me, as a wise master builder I laid a foundation, and another is building upon it. But let each man be careful how he builds upon it. For no man can lay a foundation other than the one which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if any man builds upon the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, each man’s work will become evident; for the day will show it, because it is to be revealed with fire; and the fire itself will test the quality of each man’s work. If any man’s work which he has built upon it remains, he shall receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he shall suffer loss; but he himself shall be saved, yet so as through fire.”

I assume the “building” upon the foundation (Jesus Christ) is one’s works, and that these works are “tested” in the fires of purgatory. However, I have trouble understanding how in Purgatory one man (the first ‘any’) receives a REWARD, while another, (the second ‘any’) suffers LOSS – though he is nonetheless saved, “as through fire.”

As I see it, this can be looked at in only two ways. One is that there is both reward and loss in purgatory for each man. This is to mean that, a person who goes to Purgatory (‘any’ person) has some works that are burnt up, being inadequate, but that he has other works which are good, and for which he receives a reward. So there is both reward and loss for each, respecting different works.

However, the way Paul uses the word “any” inclines me to think that he refers to two distinct types of human being, - that is, either one who experiences loss, or one who experiences reward. If these two types of person are distinct and are mutually incompatible, how can they go to the same place, Purgatory, where there obviously IS loss? It would seem only the man who suffers loss can go there, not the man who receives a reward. The man who receives only a reward would not suffer any loss in other words. He would not have to be saved “through fire” as it were. He would belong in a completely different category.

So the question then is, are these verses talking about Purgatory at all, or something different?

I look forward to hearing from you all. God Bless.
 
Although your first hypothesis makes absolutely sense, it seems to me that the text is better interpreted by the second.
 
Purgatory is one of those things i keep bouncing back n forth on. i get the purpose of it one one hand, but still no one can in any way can convince me why in all of Gods’ infinite power and mercy does God need Purgatory to even exist. Why are " scars " so hard for God to mend on His own. They aren’t , an then I wonder okay, well maybe it is to teach the individual some kind of lesson. If that is the case exactly what is the point in that when the person can’t put it to use on Earth anymore.

The Church can’t even define who goes to Heaven, or Purgatory, all it has done is define in the level of sins, and then for some reason with ease decided anyone outside of the Roman Catholic Church is going straight to hell, with a few convoluted exceptions tossed in there. Must be nice to know though that a murder and a person who has been good and kind all their life but decided not to be a Roman Catholic are both going to Hell. While " bad catholics " for what ever reason are going to purgatory before they get to Heaven.

Would be interesting to see the Roman Catholic Church come out with a list of who goes to purgatory and why.
 
Although your first hypothesis makes absolutely sense, it seems to me that the text is better interpreted by the second.
That is what I am leaning towards now. That is my plain sense of the wordage Paul uses.
 
Well, if the second conclusion is the correct one, then I can only assume the “fire” of loss that the loser feels is a type of loss in the court of Heaven among the saints. That is, that one was not as great a saint as he or she might have been. I know that our rewards will be different, and I’m fine with that. Though I will feel an acute pain on arriving in Heaven knowing I did not reach my fullest potential as a saint (unless, in this life I do indeed become a saint!). But that pain will be removed once we see the Beatific Vision, and each and every tear will be wiped away…
 
Last edited:
I assume the “building” upon the foundation (Jesus Christ) is one’s works, and that these works are “tested” in the fires of purgatory.
Unless the fire in the part “and the fire itself will test the quality of each man’s work” refers to something different than does the fire in the part "but he himself shall be saved, yet so as through fire.” The first fire standing for God’s judgement, and the second for purgatory. “The day” referring to the judgement upon death and the works being revealed and tested by fire refer to that judgement. If the work passes the test the reward is heaven immediately. If not the loss suffered is the purifying fire of purgatory.
 
It could be read this way:

The gold, silver precious stones represent the treasure someone has stored up for themselves in heaven.

The wood, hay, straw represent things of the Earth, and someones attachment to worldly things.

The people who stored up treasure in heaven are the ones that don’t go to purgatory but straight to heaven, their reward.

The ones who suffer loss are still saved but only enter heaven after undergoing the process of purification in purgatory, where their attachments to things of this world are removed.
 
no one can in any way can convince me why in all of Gods’ infinite power and mercy does God need Purgatory to even exist
God doesn’t need it. We do.
The Church can’t even define who goes to Heaven, or Purgatory
Pardon? Those who die in a state of grace go to heaven. Those who are still imperfect must be purged of their imperfections before entering into the Beatific Vision.

See? There are your definitions!
for some reason with ease decided anyone outside of the Roman Catholic Church is going straight to hell
No, the Church doesn’t say that, either! “Extra ecclesiam nulla salus” doesn’t describe who goes to heaven – it describes how (or “through what means”) those who go to heaven actually manage to get there!
Must be nice to know though that a murder and a person who has been good and kind all their life but decided not to be a Roman Catholic are both going to Hell.
That’s not what the Church teaches, either.

I think you pretty seriously misunderstand the teaching of the Church. How can we help? Have you ever read the catechism (or the US Catholic Catechism for Adults)? I think that might be helpful for you.
 
Last edited:
Thank you. I hadn’t considered that. That makes the most sense to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top