M
Mickey
Guest
No one has responded to SylCarl’s point.No. Why would you think we believe this?
No one has responded to SylCarl’s point.No. Why would you think we believe this?
It is likewise defined, that, if those truly penitent have departed in the love of God, before they have made satisfaction by worthy fruits of penance for sins of commission and omission, the souls of these are cleansed after death by purgatorial punishments…It would help to remember that the purpose of purgatory is not to punish;
It is my understanding that this “non-remembrance” of our sin refers to the FINAL judgment at the Endtimes.We are told that God does not remember our sin. That would not be true if we are to be punished after death although it has been forgiven during our life.
A number of people responded to SylCarl. And, SylCarl never said it was better to wait on baptism, so I’m not sure of your point.No one has responded to SylCarl’s point.
VociMike responded but he was apparently mistaken. Can you show me the other responses–I must have missed them. Thank you. This is what SylCarl said:A number of people responded to SylCarl. And, SylCarl never said it was better to wait on baptism, so I’m not sure of your point.
Where did you get this translation? The last line from an online Catholic translation reads:It is likewise defined, that, if those truly penitent have departed in the love of God, before they have made satisfaction by worthy fruits of penance for sins of commission and omission, the souls of these are cleansed after death by purgatorial punishments…
Laetentur Coeli, Council of Florence (1439)
There have been people who argued that very point, and I’m sure there have been people who have tried it. That’s not a very good idea, though, and the Church does not teach that you should do so.So then do Roman Catholics believe it is better to wait for very late in life to be baptized?
Is that necessary?I wonder if anyone has the original Latin and/or Greek of the text?
Amen. And to me, purgatory and indulgences have always been a legalistic mess.We aren’t supposed to be caught in a legalistic mess
No, but that was an issue in the very early Church. The reason was because the doctrine of confession had not been fully developed, and there was debate as to whether or not a person could be reconciled with God after committing a mortal sin. Some bishops even argued against the acceptance of heretics or murderers back to the Church. And of course, you couldn’t commit heresy unless you weren’t first a Christian by baptism. Some of these movements were the Donatists and Montanists (I think).So then do Roman Catholics believe it is better to wait for very late in life to be baptized?
There is much about “punishment” here:Where did you get this translation?
My response would be:VociMike responded but he was apparently mistaken. Can you show me the other responses–I must have missed them. Thank you. This is what SylCarl said:
“The Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration. Does that regeneration involve punishment? No, both the temporal and eternal punishments are forgiven. What Purgatory encourages are those who feel baptism should be put off as long as possible. Consider if two people have lead exactly the same life except one was baptized as an infant and the other wasn’t. Each is on their deathbed. At that point the one is baptized and receives full forgiveness. The other gives a confession but still faces Purgatory.”
And so are venial sins. Are you not taught that even venial sins of which you have forgotten are absolved, and that Holy Communion is for the remission of sins? So now you have all these wonderful sacraments–baptism, reconciliation, and Holy Communion for the remission of sins that the Lord has given to us out of His great love and mercy for the human race. He is all merciful and forgiving. There is no need for the post schism “doctrine” of purgatory and/or indulgences.But, the Church has recognized that even horrible mortal sins can be forgiven in the sacrament of penance.
I think it’s necessary and important, if only to get the real word translated as “pain” or “punishment.” Those are two distinct words. The word “punishment” has a penal connotation that the word “pain” does not.Is that necessary?
cleansing = purge (purgatorial)
pain = punishment
Bingo! And so the other sacraments of forgiveness when accompanied by contrition and faith by the mercy of God are for our forgiveness. The idea of further punishments or pains in a place or state of pre-heaven does not wash.In such a case, even a deathbed Baptism will not save a sinner from the pains of Purgatory.
Oh, okay!The word “punishment” has a penal connotation that the word “pain” does not.
Yeah, the definition seems to continue to change as the centuries go by.Purgatory is the process of working out those imperfections. This is not a punishment any more than the training of a dog is a punishment;
To that point, I offer this quote from:Yeah, the definition seems to continue to change as the centuries go by.![]()
So, my question, if it is indeed momentary, how do indulgences or even pennace effect my “stay” in purgatory? I’m not arguing, I really want to understand.Father Tavard showed how purgatory has been understood by Catholics as both a place of punishment and a state of cleansing, perhaps even momentary, at the time of death. Among the mystics, the latter image has greater prominence inasmuch as final purgation means an encounter with the “fire” of divine love which removes the effects of sin on the human person.
Only if you believe that you are perfect and do not need the Graces of deification.Bingo! And so the other sacraments of forgiveness when accompanied by contrition and faith by the mercy of God are for our forgiveness. The idea of further punishments or pains in a place or state of pre-heaven does not wash.![]()