I found it interesting. Like Tim Lahaye’s Left Behind series, it is a good idea. This article seemed to have some validity until it used some of the quotes from Revelation to back it up. Nostradamus got a lot of things right, but he also got a lot of things wrong. I remember way back when Lybia’s Kaddaufy (?SP) was accused of being the third anti-christ behind Hitler and Alexander The Great or Kingus Kahn (don’t remeber which of the two at the moment, it was a few decades ago).
Well, atleast it is getting some people off of the Vatican or Pres. Bush’s backs. That is who they usually refer to as being the anti-Christ.
On a serious note though, read Scott Hahn’s The Lamb’s Supper, it is very informative as to the Church’s original explaination to the Book of Revelation. It was also enlightening to my cradle Catholic eyes.
Anybody else want to comment? Its really interesting. I don’t want to jump to conclusions, but I think it is a good theory and I will take it very lightly and rememeber it as a possibility.
Any article that bases its arguments on a combination of Nostradamus and astrology isn’t one that I’d jump at believing. The site owner also bases his theories on “new age geography”
And if the Bible Code books weren’t daft enough, this person has his own Bible Code theories - apparently taking everything from the King James Version. Obviously that must be the original version God wrote else this theory would be lunacy!
Here’s what he says on Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI:
DISCLAIMER: Catholic Answers has turned over the archive to Catholic-Questions.org and no longer owns, manages, or moderates the forums. For additional apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.