Z
zerinus
Guest
I don’t recall that. But actually, I am going to have to take a break from here for a time; not sure for how long.Thank you for the response. The first time I asked you about the Hoffman episode, many weeks ago, you ignored me, so it appears we are enjoying a more forthcoming Zerinus nowadays.
I told you before; at that time Hinckley stated that it was not certain if the documents were authentic.Gordon Hinckley, in 1985, was second counselor to LDS president Spencer W. Kimball, is that correct? Isn’t that a pretty high office? Wouldn’t one expect Dr. Hinckley to have at LEAST the same spiritual cognizance that a Zerinus has?
Well, if the Church wants to spend that kind of money on a document of whose authenticity they are not sure of, that is their business. Perhaps they have more money than they know what to do with!After all, Zerinus is able to “read between the lines” and conclude that the Catholic Church is merely retaliating against Mormons over the baptism thing. Why couldn’t Gordon Hinckley, second counselor to the Mormon Prophet, who undoubtedly consulted with the Prophet prior to spending some $45k of the tithers’ money on scam documents, be able to divine via the Holy Ghost that there was a scam going on? Zerinus quotes Rev. Hinckley as saying that he wasn’t sure the documents were authentic. Is that why he spend the $45k on them? Man, that’s a lot of money to spend on counterfeit paper, especially when it is money that comes from little people scraping to buy food for their children.
zeirnus