The state should not place children in the care of others on the basis of religious ideas.
They should do everything possible to do what is best for the child.
So, if a Jewish child needs an adoptive placement, you’d say it’s wrong for the agency to try to place that child with a Jewish family?
Of course…but what if a Jewish family never applies, how long should an agency wait for a proper couple from a proper religion?
Exactly. So when the government denies Catholic agencies adoptions to willing parents…because gay couples deserve children too…whose religion are we honoring?
do you know a situation when a willing Catholic couple was denied the opportunity to adopt a child because a gay couple wanted to adopt a child?
Well, I adopted one child many years ago, and fostered another. So I think I’m at least somewhat acquainted with it.
and you still think it’s better for them to not be adopted at all? That’s confusing.
Might be best for the children to be put in the care of Aunt A or Uncle B, who may ultimately adopt them, rather than sent off to live with total strangers.
Exactly, doing what is best for the child is always best… unfortunately most children in foster homes are not that lucky.
I wish I knew the answer, but consider the number of children who need adopting, compared to the number of “perfect” couples who want to adopt… allowing a gay couple, single people, people of a different religion &/or different race should be considered… as long as all the proper “stuff” takes place to make sure the person/people who want to adopt are good people.
To spend your life thinking you are unloved, unwanted, or no one cares about you cannot possible be what God wants for His children.