S
SalamKhan
Guest
What was the most dangerous/notorious heresy in Church history and why? Arianism? Catharism? Something else?
Thanks in advance and God bless.
Thanks in advance and God bless.
The most dangerous heresy is the one that is currently infecting the Church - Modernism. Pope St. Pius X condemned it in his Encyclical “Pascendi Dominic Gregis”, but now it is rife in the Church. It is worse than the heresies of Arianiam, Protestantism and all the rest. In fact, St. Pius X called it the “Synthesis of all Heresies”, that’s how dangerous it is.What was the most dangerous/notorious heresy in Church history and why? Arianism? Catharism? Something else?
Thanks in advance and God bless.
Good point, but I didn’t mention that since it’s ongoing while others we can look at in hindsight and say which was worse.The most dangerous heresy is the one that is currently infecting the Church - Modernism. Pope St. Pius X condemned it in his Encyclical “Pascendi Dominic Gregis”, but now it is rife in the Church. It is worse than the heresies of Arianiam, Protestantism and all the rest. In fact, St. Pius X called it the “Synthesis of all Heresies”, that’s how dangerous it is.
Modernism basically is akin to the Freemasons, that is, they teach that morals can change, teachings can change and that all the miracles in the Gospels were not real miracles. There are even “Catholic” Bishops saying this publicly!
God bless.
I say this as someone who is still Protestant. The Reformation.What was the most dangerous/notorious heresy in Church history and why? Arianism? Catharism? Something else?
Protestantism.What was the most dangerous/notorious heresy in Church history and why? Arianism? Catharism? Something else?
Thanks in advance and God bless.
Well, there is no Baptism in Islam nor do they adopt the Christian name so I don’t think Islam would count as a heresy. But in way it can be seen as some sort of Arabised Proto-Protestantism.Protestantism.
Protestantism was the single most successful heresy ever (unless you consider Islam a heresy too… then it would be Islam).
Protestantism’s ultimate outcome is the mess we have today in the west. When people become their own religious authority, you get what we have today.
However, the Catharism was physically the most damaging to each individual affected. They believed that matter was evil and believe that it was sinful to have children and promoted ritualistic suicide. They also had a lot of other twisted beliefs. Had they grown in size, it would have been the most dangerous. But thankfully, with God’s help, we put an end to that.
What is similar about the Jesuit and Dominican Orders?I say this as someone who is still Protestant. The Reformation.![]()
Modernism as defined by the media. The media models bad and immoral behaviors. Every bad/immoral/indecent image we see in a magazine and written immorality in books. Even comic books are promoting heroes who are not heroic, women who are less than decent. This combined with a news media that believes immorality is good or neutral. “It’s just the way it is.” That’s a lie. Anyone can create media without the profanity, without the sexual situations and without anti-Christian images and messages. But the poison took decades of promotion since those involved knew that we could not go from Leave it to Beaver to Two and Half Men overnight. The poison was dripped into our veins slowly. More and more people were influenced by the media preaching immorality. And the Catholic Church? A joke. Backwards. Irrelevant. Religion is “too demanding” for some, but we need it.Not sure, but there are great ones like:
Today, there are too many dissents, like applying modern ideals to Church teaching (like thinking that we are always right and the Church is probably wrong, even when people don’t want to research the logic in the Church’s teachings)
- Arianism, 2. the Eastern Orthodox schism, 3. the Protestant Rebellion, and 4. today (not sure the name, maybe “Post-modernism” or just “modernism”).
or going too far as to go into schism with the Pope, like sedevacantism and the SSPX.
If I am wrong, someone correct me, I heard this list from Church Militant.
Yes by killing themProtestantism.
Protestantism was the single most successful heresy ever (unless you consider Islam a heresy too… then it would be Islam).
Protestantism’s ultimate outcome is the mess we have today in the west. When people become their own religious authority, you get what we have today.
However, the Catharism was physically the most damaging to each individual affected. They believed that matter was evil and believe that it was sinful to have children and promoted ritualistic suicide. They also had a lot of other twisted beliefs. Had they grown in size, it would have been the most dangerous. But thankfully, with God’s help, we put an end to that.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t the Cathars incredibly dangerous? For example, killing missionaries sent to them?Yes by killing them
No I think you will find that they were exceptionally peaceful. It has been long held as nothing short of murder they way the medieval church treated cathars. This may help a littleCorrect me if I’m wrong, but weren’t the Cathars incredibly dangerous? For example, killing missionaries sent to them?
There is NOTHING original about Protestantism. In fact Protestantism is a “Reader’s Digest” of ALL the ancient heresies repackaged into one big heresy hydra!Protestantism.
Protestantism was the single most successful heresy ever (unless you consider Islam a heresy too… then it would be Islam).
Protestantism’s ultimate outcome is the mess we have today in the west. When people become their own religious authority, you get what we have today.
However, the Catharism was physically the most damaging to each individual affected. They believed that matter was evil and believe that it was sinful to have children and promoted ritualistic suicide. They also had a lot of other twisted beliefs. Had they grown in size, it would have been the most dangerous. But thankfully, with God’s help, we put an end to that.
From Catholic Answers:What was the most dangerous/notorious heresy in Church history and why? Arianism? Catharism? Something else?
Thanks in advance and God bless.
What group(s) PRIOR to Luther held the doctrines of sola scriptura or sola fide?There is NOTHING original about Protestantism. In fact Protestantism is a “Reader’s Digest” of ALL the ancient heresies repackaged into one big heresy hydra!![]()
While the original heresies didn’t go by those names specifically, make no mistake, the ancient heretics preferred Scripture to Church teaching, or at least their own interpretation of it. Then there is St. James’ Letter which even THEN was being written to counter the then current heresy of Faith alone based on the misreading of St. Paul’s letters. St. Augustine was arguing with variations on SS and SF even in his own time. The more one studies the ancient heresies, the more one sees nothing new in Protestantism.What group(s) PRIOR to Luther held the doctrines of sola scriptura or sola fide?
To be fair, that’s not really true. Yes, Protestantism has some similarities with previous heresies, but they are not a repackaging.There is NOTHING original about Protestantism. In fact Protestantism is a “Reader’s Digest” of ALL the ancient heresies repackaged into one big heresy hydra!![]()
I recommend you buy and listen to lighthousecatholicmedia.org/store/title/fire-sword-crusades-inquisition-reformation?promoCode=104130While the original heresies didn’t go by those names specifically, make no mistake, the ancient heretics preferred Scripture to Church teaching, or at least their own interpretation of it. Then there is St. James’ Letter which even THEN was being written to counter the then current heresy of Faith alone based on the misreading of St. Paul’s letters. St. Augustine was arguing with variations on SS and SF even in his own time. The more one studies the ancient heresies, the more one sees nothing new in Protestantism.
And like the hydra, every time one of its heads is cut off (proved false) multiple new heads appear that seem to be something different.
So for example today Lutherans are very prickly about SS and FA. They claim they don’t REALLY hold fast to those, but rather tradition, their confessions etc. Even though their fundamentalist brethren are quite comfortable with raw SS and FA.