L
Latinitas
Guest
Hi everyone,
Here’s a question I’ve been thinking about for quite some time:
Is it necessary for the validity of the sacrament of Holy Orders, that the Order prior to it be received validly?
For example, is it necessary for the validity of the priestly ordination, that the person have validly received the diaconate? It certainly is requried for the liceity (canon 1050 n.2), but is required for validity? Similarly, is it necessary for the validity of the episcopal consecration that the presbyteral ordination have been conferred on the person?
Apparently, some books I’ve been reading say that some Popes in the Middle Ages were consecrated bishops from the diaconate, but this is more conceivable, since the lesser is contained in the greater, in the case of the presbyterate and the episcopate.
St. Thomas answers this question in the negative (S.Th. Suppl. q. 35 a. 5), but he has an incorrect view of Holy Orders in that he views the subdiaconate and minor orders as sacraments (that is, having a true sacramental character), whereas the episcopacy is not a sacrament, and he proves this with the argument that the priestly character is presupposed in the episcopal consecration, which does not hold in regards to the priesthood and lower. However, if one holds the Episcopacy does not possess a distinct and superior sacramental character, then one is led to this view naturally, since one then must see it as simply a solemn consecration, but since we know that the episcopacy is sacramental (cf. Lumen Gentium, 21), this view is difficult to hold.
We also must take into account the fact that the Gospels never speak of Jesus ordaining his Apostles to the diaconate or presybteral, but does speak of them being ordained to the episcopacy (by the washing of the feet).
I’m tempted to agree with St. Thomas that one Order need not presuppose another for validity, but I’m not sure, since neither the Catechism of the Catholic Church, nor Dr. Ott speak about this.
Any thoughts? Magisterial documents and examples from Church history are greatly appreciated. Opinions may also be expressed.
Here’s a question I’ve been thinking about for quite some time:
Is it necessary for the validity of the sacrament of Holy Orders, that the Order prior to it be received validly?
For example, is it necessary for the validity of the priestly ordination, that the person have validly received the diaconate? It certainly is requried for the liceity (canon 1050 n.2), but is required for validity? Similarly, is it necessary for the validity of the episcopal consecration that the presbyteral ordination have been conferred on the person?
Apparently, some books I’ve been reading say that some Popes in the Middle Ages were consecrated bishops from the diaconate, but this is more conceivable, since the lesser is contained in the greater, in the case of the presbyterate and the episcopate.
St. Thomas answers this question in the negative (S.Th. Suppl. q. 35 a. 5), but he has an incorrect view of Holy Orders in that he views the subdiaconate and minor orders as sacraments (that is, having a true sacramental character), whereas the episcopacy is not a sacrament, and he proves this with the argument that the priestly character is presupposed in the episcopal consecration, which does not hold in regards to the priesthood and lower. However, if one holds the Episcopacy does not possess a distinct and superior sacramental character, then one is led to this view naturally, since one then must see it as simply a solemn consecration, but since we know that the episcopacy is sacramental (cf. Lumen Gentium, 21), this view is difficult to hold.
We also must take into account the fact that the Gospels never speak of Jesus ordaining his Apostles to the diaconate or presybteral, but does speak of them being ordained to the episcopacy (by the washing of the feet).
I’m tempted to agree with St. Thomas that one Order need not presuppose another for validity, but I’m not sure, since neither the Catechism of the Catholic Church, nor Dr. Ott speak about this.
Any thoughts? Magisterial documents and examples from Church history are greatly appreciated. Opinions may also be expressed.