R
Rawb
Guest
I mentioned it occasionally happened, but notice that it’s rare enough that we’re able to pick out exceptions. We say things like “Well the Protection Icon has only the Theotokos, and the Pokrov Icon.” If this was reversed and we were trying to show that it’s an exception to have her with Christ we couldn’t do that, because we’d have to be saying “Well the Tenderness Icon has Christ, and so does the Theotokos of the Sign, and so does Our Lady of Częstochowa, oh and so does…” on and on and on. Get what I mean?I’m just saying the icon is commonly depicted without Christ, whether the Theotokos is completely alone or depicting the full scene. I wasn’t attempting to use such icons as evidence for an argument or anything like that. And interestingly a quick Google search shows some Christ-less Pokrov icons from at least as early as the 15th century.
The Protection Icon is also, from what I remember, a depiction of a historical event, and so the ‘rules’ are slightly different.
My point though was that if we see a piece of naturalistic religious art from the West featuring just the Theotokos, it’s far more likely to be just a piece of art than an attempt at painting an Icon.