A
anon98328916
Guest
Question about our conscience. Our conscience tells us right from wrong. Is it God that tells us this?
I highly recommend that.
While it is true that God speaks to us in the depth of our hearts, our conscience is not precisely the same thing as the Holy Ghost prompting us to do good or dissuading us from doing evil at a given moment. The conscience is a sense of right and wrong that is based on our knowledge and understanding, which can be flawed. It is therefore possible to think something is right when it is wrong, and vice versa. Nevertheless, since it is what we believe, we are obligated to follow our conscience even though it may be wrong. At the same time, we are also obligated to form our conscience, to the best of our ability, according to what is right and true, including all the Church’s teachings.Our conscience tells us right from wrong. Is it God that tells us this?
And that is the very definition of brainwashing. To tell people that there thoughts and beliefs must align with what an organized institution teaches.While it is true that God speaks to us in the depth of our hearts, our conscience is not precisely the same thing as the Holy Ghost prompting us to do good or dissuading us from doing evil at a given moment. The conscience is a sense of right and wrong that is based on our knowledge and understanding, which can be flawed. It is therefore possible to think something is right when it is wrong, and vice versa. Nevertheless, since it is what we believe, we are obligated to follow our conscience even though it may be wrong. At the same time, we are also obligated to form our conscience, to the best of our ability, according to what is right and true, including all the Church’s teachings.
Hum somebody does not know what brainwashing is.And that is the very definition of brainwashing. To tell people that there thoughts and beliefs must align with what an organized institution teaches.
I think not. Brianwashing: make (someone) adopt radically different beliefs by using systematic and often forcible pressure.And that is the very definition of brainwashing. To tell people that there thoughts and beliefs must align with what an organized institution teaches.
No more schools?And that is the very definition of brainwashing. To tell people that there thoughts and beliefs must align with what an organized institution teaches.
Hum somebody does not know what brainwashing is.
Mind control is a better word then, though brainwashing is a form of mind control.I think not. Brianwashing: make (someone) adopt radically different beliefs by using systematic and often forcible pressure.
The Church only proposes, she never imposes. Now, call it brain-healing and I think you’re OK.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=kmDYgL17thkNo more schools?
Why does it have to be an organized institution? Why ever impose beliefs on anyone? Is your assertion something we must believe? Ought to? Would you disapprove if we did not accept your beliefs about ‘brainwashing’?
A good Catholic is a questioning Catholic. Catholics who have the faculty to reason and do not question the doctrines of their faith suffer from fideism. While right reason may reach and agree with many of our articles of faith; right reason cannot conclude that any article of faith is irrational.…
Anyway, telling someone they must form there conscious [sic] around the rules and regulations of an organization that demands unquestioning obedience, like the Catholic Church, because the Church says they must,…
No actually.One excommunicates themselves when they doubt
Yes, actually. The obstinate doubter is a heretic and is exommuncated latae sententiae.No actually.
Such is only for very particular matters as a remedy to help one repent of the sin and to underline the extreme seriousness of the matter.
Right more* extreme* matters than just doubts.Yes, actually. The obstinate doubter is a heretic and is exommuncated latae sententiae.
Can. 751 Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith …
Can. 1364 §1. … an apostate from the faith, a heretic, or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication…
Excommunication is always medicinal whether latae sententiae or formally imposed.
I would amend that but just a little. The intellect is a faculty of the soul, and conscience is an act of the intellect whereby we make moral judgments as to right and wrong.Conscience is not a faculty of the soul but and ACT of the intellect where we judge something to be right or wrong. Our conscience must be formed by the Church.
No, a good Catholic does what the Church says they should do otherwise they risk sinning and going to Hell. Catholicism doesn’t need a reason for the rules, and decrees it makes other than the claim of being the one true church, which automatically = they have the power to enforce what they want and need no reason too other than “the Church says so”. Of course, they give reasons to be more convincing to followers, who must then, if they want to be in communion with the Church, must accept as truth or at least humble themselves and accept without full understanding because the reason is “above human comprehension”.A good Catholic is a questioning Catholic. Catholics who have the faculty to reason and do not question the doctrines of their faith suffer from fideism. While right reason may reach and agree with many of our articles of faith; right reason cannot conclude that any article of faith is irrational.
The Church proposes, not imposes, the truths in her deposit of faith. The instruction is “ought” not “must.” One excommunicates themselves when they doubt, not when they question.
A good Catholic does what the Church teaches because they will to do so.No, a good Catholic does what the Church says they should do otherwise they risk sinning and going to Hell. Catholicism doesn’t need a reason for the rules, and decrees it makes other than the claim of being the one true church, which automatically = they have the power to enforce what they want and need no reason too other than “the Church says so”. Of course, they give reasons to be more convincing to followers, who must then, if they want to be in communion with the Church, must accept as truth or at least humble themselves and accept without full understanding because the reason is “above human comprehension”.