Question about temporary altars

  • Thread starter Thread starter JMichaelByers
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JMichaelByers

Guest
I’m sorry, I must have hit the wrong key as I was asking the last question, if in fact it did go through.

It is my understanding that when the Holy Mass is offered on a temporary altar in one’s home or any enviornment away from the church such as on a dinner table; one should not eat on that table for 24 hours.

Has my understanding been wrong or is this something that has changed? Could you please point me to a supportive document which treats the respect we should have for the altar temporary or otherwise?

Thank you very much and may God bless each of you,

Michael Byers
 
I’m sorry, I must have hit the wrong key as I was asking the last question, if in fact it did go through.

It is my understanding that when the Holy Mass is offered on a temporary altar in one’s home or any enviornment away from the church such as on a dinner table; one should not eat on that table for 24 hours.

Has my understanding been wrong or is this something that has changed? Could you please point me to a supportive document which treats the respect we should have for the altar temporary or otherwise?

Thank you very much and may God bless each of you,

Michael Byers
From the 2004 Instruction Redemptionis Sacramentum:
“[77.] The celebration of Holy Mass is not to be inserted in any way into the setting of a
common meal, nor joined with this kind of banquet. Mass is not to be celebrated without
grave necessity on a dinner table
[footnote 159: Cf. S. Congregation for Divine Worship, Instruction, Liturgicae instaurationes, n. 9: AAS 62 (1970) p. 702.]
nor in a dining room or banquet hall, nor in a room
where food is present, nor in a place where the participants during the celebration itself are
seated at tables. If out of grave necessity Mass must be celebrated in the same place where
eating will later take place, there is to be a clear interval of time between the conclusion of
Mass and the beginning of the meal, and ordinary food is not to be set before the faithful
during the celebration of Mass.”

The footnoted document is at adoremus.org/LiturgicaeInstaurationes.html and has:
“9. The Eucharist is celebrated as a rule in a place of worship.[footnote 34: See 1970 GIRM no. 260] Apart from cases of real need, as adjudged by the Ordinary for his jurisdiction, celebration outside a church is not permitted. When the Ordinary does allow this, there must be care that a worthy place is chosen and that the Mass is celebrated on a suitable table. If at all possible, the celebration should not take place in a dining room or on a dining-room table.”

The 1969 Instruction Actio Pastoralis has:
“10. … c. The norms regarding the eucharistic fast are to be observed; there is therefore never to be any sort of meal or banquet preceding the Mass. If there is one afterward, the table for it, as far as possible, is not to be the one on which the eucharist has been celebrated.”
(From Documents on the Liturgy 1963-1979, Liturgical Press, Minnesota, 1982, ISBN 0-8146-1281-4, page 675).

I am not aware of anything requiring 24 hours before a meal can be served on a table, which has been used to celebrate the Eucharist. A “clear interval of time” is all that is mentioned in the 2004 Instruction quoted above.
 
It is my understanding that when the Holy Mass is offered on a temporary altar in one’s home or any enviornment away from the church such as on a dinner table; one should not eat on that table for 24 hours.

Has my understanding been wrong or is this something that has changed? Could you please point me to a supportive document which treats the respect we should have for the altar temporary or otherwise?
From canon law:
Can. 932 §1 The eucharistic celebration is to be carried out in a sacred place, unless in a particular case necessity requires otherwise; in which case the celebration must be in a fitting place.

§2 The eucharistic Sacrifice must be carried out at an altar that is dedicated or blessed. Outside a sacred place an appropriate table may be used, but always with an altar cloth and a corporal.
From Redemptionis Sacramentum:
[77.] The celebration of Holy Mass is not to be inserted in any way into the setting of a common meal, nor joined with this kind of banquet. Mass is not to be celebrated without grave necessity on a dinner table nor in a dining room or banquet hall, nor in a room where food is present, nor in a place where the participants during the celebration itself are seated at tables. If out of grave necessity Mass must be celebrated in the same place where eating will later take place, there is to be a clear interval of time between the conclusion of Mass and the beginning of the meal, and ordinary food is not to be set before the faithful during the celebration of Mass.
That’s what I’ve found related to your inquiry.
 
I’m sorry, I must have hit the wrong key as I was asking the last question, if in fact it did go through.

It is my understanding that when the Holy Mass is offered on a temporary altar in one’s home or any enviornment away from the church such as on a dinner table; one should not eat on that table for 24 hours.

Has my understanding been wrong or is this something that has changed? Could you please point me to a supportive document which treats the respect we should have for the altar temporary or otherwise?

Thank you very much and may God bless each of you,

Michael Byers
Mass should not be offered on a dinner table or in a private home except with the Bishops permission and for serious and necessary reason. Such as hiding during time of war, in a country where public Christianity is forbidden, etc.
 
Mass should not be offered on a dinner table or in a private home except with the Bishops permission and for serious and necessary reason. ** Such as hiding during time of war, in a country where public Christianity is forbidden, etc.**
That’s not true. I know of one retired priest who celebrates the Mass each day at home with his bishop’s approval because he does not drive, is rather frail and cannot get to church.
 
That’s not true. I know of one retired priest who celebrates the Mass each day at home with his bishop’s approval because he does not drive, is rather frail and cannot get to church.
Well let’s see he has the Bishops permission, it would seem necessary since he is homebound, and is a private Mass. I think it falls under the “Etc” provision.
 
I think what is being reprobated is that practice that arose in some places in the 70s (we have alot of purgatory to go through for that decade) of private Masses in private homes on the dining room table, not for any great need but just for the sake of some family occasion. Some priests went along with this for what reason I don’t understand–a misguided nostalgia for “house churches”, a desire to “get closer to the people” perhaps. Many parishes, before the actual church is built, have had Mass in parish halls, school cafeterias, even hotels or country clubs, in areas that are dining or meeting rooms, naturally with the bishop’s permission, but if a dedicated portable altar cannot be found, a regular table can be used, suitable prepared.

What is not supposed to happen, the way the above cites read to me, is combining a banquet or common meal with Eucharist in a “dinner theatre” type format. This was also seen in the 70s too many times.
 
I think what is being reprobated is that practice that arose in some places in the 70s (we have alot of purgatory to go through for that decade) of private Masses in private homes on the dining room table, not for any great need but just for the sake of some family occasion. Some priests went along with this for what reason I don’t understand–a misguided nostalgia for “house churches”, a desire to “get closer to the people” perhaps. Many parishes, before the actual church is built, have had Mass in parish halls, school cafeterias, even hotels or country clubs, in areas that are dining or meeting rooms, naturally with the bishop’s permission, but if a dedicated portable altar cannot be found, a regular table can be used, suitable prepared.

What is not supposed to happen, the way the above cites read to me, is combining a banquet or common meal with Eucharist in a “dinner theatre” type format. This was also seen in the 70s too many times.
We still see now and then this idea of a parish priest agreeing to celebrate Mass at the homes of different people EVERY Wednesday evening for 10 or 15 invited people from the parish. You could sign up to host this and then provide the meal afterwards. This is not permitted.
 
I want to thank John Lilburne, japhy, Br. Rich SFO and puzzleannie for your responses. I really appreciate the references to Can. 932 and Redemptionis Sacramentum.

God bless you,

Michael Byers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top