C
Question 409 (Page 222)
Is Masturbation an offense against love?
Masturbation is an offense against love, because it makes the excitement of sexual pleasure an end in itself and uncouples it from the holistic unfolding of love between a man and a women. That is why “sex with yourself” is a contradiction in terms.
The Church does not demonize masturbation, but she warns against trivializing it. In fact many young people and adults are in danger of becoming isolated in their consumption of lewd pictures, films, and Internet services instead of finding love in a personal relationship. Loneliness can lead to a blind alley in which masturbation becomes an addiction. Living by the motto ‘“For sex I do not need anyone; i will have it myself, however and whenever I need it” makes nobody happy.
:clapping:I think that people waste too much time in chasing heresy in individual words instead of trying to educate the youth on the concept of sin and why it is to be avoided.
…
If we were really concerned about heresy associated with specific words then we would freak out at hearing some of the older Catholic prayers that make perfect sense when accepted with consideration to their poetic form but they would be borderline heretical if taken literally.
Except that such a statement would not be the teaching of the Catholic Church.If so, it’s a very poor choice in wording.
The word demonizing shouldn’t have been used at all.
Simply stating that masturbation is a mortal sin, would have been a sufficient end to the matter.
I completely agree. I don’t think teens would interpret “does not intend to demonize” to mean that masturbation is not gravely sinful. Its a confusing thing to talk about because how the Church uses words and how common people use words is different. In academic circles masturbation occurs in all acts of foreplay. Any manual stimulation is masturbation whether it occurs as foreplay before intercourse or not. The Church here isn’t defining masturbation but working with the teen’s language. As such, in not “demonizing” it is avoiding the misinterpretation that sexual pleasure is evil or can only be morally rationalized through procreation (like a necessary evil). It rather focuses on understanding that seeking sexual pleasure in isolation is morally disordered. These faculties were designed to unite husband and wife together. There is no one to unite to when you masturbate, as such it can encourage an objectifying attitude that can affect your marriage later on.First this is a translation from a German text. Second this book is written to put things in the proper context for young people. Third I do not think that there is a common agreement on the verb “to demonize”. In some cases to demonize is to make something an agent of evil, more than being evil in itself. I think that people waste too much time in chasing heresy in individual words instead of trying to educate the youth on the concept of sin and why it is to be avoided. A lot of people look at sin a something black and white just to be avoided and do not look a it as how it causes separation between man and God. I truly think that the eastern Catholics do a better job than the Latin Catholics when it comes to teach about sin to the young ones. Remember this is a book for the youth, youth that usually is not that well educated or catechized. We have already seen a worst case than this in the Italian translation of this same book, that is a bigger can of worms.
If we were really concerned about heresy associated with specific words then we would freak out at hearing some of the older Catholic prayers that make perfect sense when accepted with consideration to their poetic form but they would be borderline heretical if taken literally.