C
CHESTERTONRULES
Guest
Why is it more difficult for rich man to enter heaven?
He’s Catholic.Why is it more difficult for rich man to enter heaven?
Is that your final answer?He’s Catholic.![]()
I don’t think it’s possible for you to find a less difficult question for me.Is that your final answer?
Should I find a less difficult question for you?
If you were trying to be charitable or helpful, that may have been lost in translation. Perhaps you might be more effective in convincing us of your beliefs if you took a different strategy.I don’t think it’s possible for you find a less difficult question for me.![]()
![]()
This is not about charity, but humor.If you were trying to be charitable or helpful, that may have been lost in translation. Perhaps you might be more effective in convincing us of your beliefs if you took a different strategy.
God bless
You have stated your case.This is not about charity, but humor.![]()
In the context of Christ’s encounter, it’s because his desire was more for keeping his riches, then it was for following Christ.Why is it more difficult for rich man to enter heaven?
I agree.In the context of Christ’s encounter, it’s because his desire was more for keeping his riches, then it was for following Christ.
Excellent point.If Calvinism were true, it would not matter if a man was rich or poor, his salvation would be determined by factors other than his condition or behavior on earth.
Excellent point.
(although can I admit to laughing at Sandusky’s post… “he’s catholic” - that was a funny response)
I think he meant what he said and wasn’t just trying to be funny. I can see the humor in what he said, but I’m not sure it’s something we should try to find funny. Issues of salvation are no laughing matter.Excellent point.
(although can I admit to laughing at Sandusky’s post… “he’s catholic” - that was a funny response)
With these words of yours, it makes me wonder about my finding the video on my post “Baby Got Book” funny. Let me know your thoughts, please!I think he meant what he said and wasn’t just trying to be funny. I can see the humor in what he said, but I’m not sure it’s something we should try to find funny. Issues of salvation are no laughing matter.
This is something the Lord has been working with me on too. Somehow I don’t think God was amused.
Maybe I’m wrong?
God obviously isn’t prejudiced against one simply because they have money, so this doesn’t apply simply and exclusively to all who have material wealth. The man who puts materialism above God, will have a hard time pleasing God, and fulfilling the requirements Christ laid out on which all the law and prophets were based. A camel can’t let his hump down to go through a small opening in the wall, and so someone who is attached to material things above God won’t detach, be humble and love God above all. You don’t have to have great material wealth to have this wrong priority, as it can be anyone. Someone who has little can hold it above God. Someone who has a lot of material wealth can count it as nothing compared to God, and still seek Him first, loving Him above all, listening to His Word as it was intended, and contributing toward feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, etc.Why is it more difficult for rich man to enter heaven?
I suppose if I thought there was any truth to it whatsoever, I wouldn’t have laughed. I doubt the poster was being serious …I think he meant what he said and wasn’t just trying to be funny. I can see the humor in what he said, but I’m not sure it’s something we should try to find funny. Issues of salvation are no laughing matter.
This is something the Lord has been working with me on too. Somehow I don’t think God was amused.
Maybe I’m wrong?
No. If it were, then it would be a condition of salvation, and someone who’s unsaved could read what Christ has said, and do it, thereby making it a precondition of salvation which we both reject.This appears to be a condition of election, don’t you agree?
Assumes that “we” are all saved, and begs the question: can those who are saved lose salvation—I think not.If we choose the world over Christ we are at risk of losing salvation.
You’re “universalizing” the encounter by attempting to apply it to everyone, when Christ’s words were directed to the young man.Since this difficulty is greater for a rich man, we can assume that all of us must need to make choices.
Either we respond to God’s grace or we reject it.
It doesn’t matter, and that is because, as scripture states, if one is wealthy (and this applies to both the wicked and the righteous), it’s not because of what that one has done, but because of what God has done.If Calvinism were true, it would not matter if a man was rich or poor, his salvation would be determined by factors other than his condition or behavior on earth.
The question is not “How do I become wealthy?”It doesn’t matter, and that is because, as scripture states, if one is wealthy (and this applies to both the wicked and the righteous), it’s not because of what that one has done, but because of what God has done.
You cherry-pick my posts, in the same way that you cherry-pick scripture.The question is not “How do I become wealthy?”
The question is:
Why did Jesus say that is is more difficult for a rich man to get to heaven?
You can’t answer without refuting your Calvinist dogma.
You make no sense.You cherry-pick my posts, in the same way that you cherry-pick scripture.
Are my other points too much for you? Is that why you ignore them?
Have fun jerking people around CHESTERTON.You make no sense.
Answer the question if you can.
I have no idea what other points you are referring to.
Are you saying becoming rich or not becoming rich is a precondition of salvation? Please explain.
Jesus was not speaking about this particular person alone when he said:
23Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”
You attempt to change the meaning because it conflicts with your dogma.
You shouldn’t do that!![]()