guanophore:
How is that relevant? Clearly, they hold the prayers. Do you think that there are people in heaven that are not saints?
I guess it’s only relevant if you’re interested in proving from Scripture that prayer to the Saints is approved by God. In Rev 6:9-11 we see that there are the souls of those who have been martyred for the Word of God, but no mention of them offering prayers. In fact, they were told to “rest a little longer”. Of course, all this really doesn’t matter if your best arguement is “Because the Church says so!”
guanophore:
“Prayer” to the saints means supplication. We are asking them to join our prayers with theirs to God. Just as Paul askes in Romans that the believers join with him in prayer. Do you never ask anyone to pray for you?
There is a difference between asking someone to pary WITH you and to pray FOR you. To illustrate, if your best friend was gonig to your favorite restaurant, would you rather he eat WITH you or eat FOR you?
guanophore:
That is all that “prayer” means in this context. It is a communication. We ask them to pray for us.
Again, their is no Scriptural basis for asking a Saint in heaven to pray FOR us. I have not seen any evidence from anyone that would tell me this is approved by God in the Scriptures.
guanophore:
What did you think He meant, when He said “greater things than I do will you do, because I go to the father?” And what did He mean when He said that we have no idea the greatness of His power that He wants to reveal in us, who believe? Catholics believe that no eye has seen, nor ear heard, what He has in store for those who love Him. He was showing His disciples what they were capable of joining - communion with the saints.
Does doing greater things mean being able to communicate with Saints in heaven? Where does the Bible say this? As far as “no eye has seen, nor ear heard, what He has in store for those who love Him”, Paul is referring to our reward in Heaven (you know, like when we “fall asleep” in Christ). You still have not proven from Scripture that God approves prayers TO those Saints who are asleep in Christ.
guanophore:
Such a statment reveals a gross ignorance of the origin of Catholic doctrine. Catholics do not derive doctrine from scripture, therefore, there is no reason to “force” any of it. The NT is Catholic, and reflects Catholic faith. There is nothing in it that is not Catholic.
I am quite aware of Catholic doctrine. However, rwillenborg seemed to want to be able to give an answer from Scripture to some Protestant friends. If all he wanted was Catholic doctrine, I wouldn’t have bothered to get involved with this thread. I would suggest, however, that you have contradicted yourself. On the one hand, you say, “Catholics do not derive doctrine from scripture”, then you tell me that “The NT is Catholic, and reflects Catholic faith. There is nothing in it that is not Catholic.” Just a rhetorical question (since it’s not the topic of this thread), how can something that is Catholic (the NT) not be necessary to derive Catholic doctrine?
guanophore:
This is a very good question. Since they do not have actual physical “ears”, one might speculate that no verbal expression is necessary at all. How loud do you think Saul had to talk, in order for Samuel to hear him?
And what is your Scriptural proof for this? Didn’t Jesus have a physical body after His ressurection? What about Enoch and Elijah who were taken up alive into heaven? Don’t they have physical ears? When Jesus talked with Moses and Elijah, didn’t they have ears? And if Mary really was bodily assumed into heaven, wouldn’t she have physical ears?
guanophore:
I gather you do not believe Jesus, when He said that those who are in HIm are “alive forevermore”?
Of course I do. Don’t you believe the Scriptures when they say that those who have passed on are “asleep in Christ”?
guanophore:
I gather you also did not receive His teaching that “you know neither the Scriptures, nor the Power of God, for He is not the God of the dead, but of the Living”.
I would suggest that, given your previous statement (“Catholics do not derive doctrine from scripture”), that it is you who “know neither the Scriptures, nor the Power of God”. Please tell me what I said that makes you even think that I do not believe God is the God of the living?
guanophore:
Does this mean you think Scripture is not accurate, when it documents that it was Samuel who appeared ot Saul? You believe that what Saul thought was the spirit of Samuel is actually the spirit of a demon? How come you don’t think that Moses and Elijah were actually demons, appearing to Christ?
Not at all. I believe God allowed Samual to come in person (why else would the witch be so surprised?), and that He did it for His own reasons (perhaps to hilight how far King Saul had slipped from His grace). Going back to Moses and Elijah, Jesus did not “conjure” them up. He was trasnfigured (glorified?) , and they came to talk with Him. God did this for His own purpose (perhaps to reinforce to these 3 that He truly was God).
One final note - in the story of Lazarus and the rich man, this is not a parable, but a true story. We know this because Jesus uses a proper name (Lazarus). It would be similar to beginning a story “There was a certain man who had achieved great success and was well know and respected across the land, and there was a certain intern named Monica…” I think most adults would immediately know who was being talked about. Along with this, it should be remembered that the communication seen in this story is between the rich man (in hell) and Abraham (in paradise). Both of these men have already passed from this life to the next. I think it is very signifcant that Abraham doesn’t encourage the rich man with the thought that his brothers may offer sin offerings on his behalf to get him out of hell (strange, no purgatory mentioned here). And there is absolutely no indicatoin that anyone on earth is praying to anyone with Abraham.