A
a83192
Guest
Secretary of State of the Vatican says that priestly celibacy is up for discussion does this mean that Married priests are on the horizon?
I am confused.
I am confused.
In the Early Church, there were married priests in the East and the West. After a while, the West started practicing a celibate priesthood while the East continued ordaining married men to the priesthood. Currently, there are some married priests in the Roman Rite (most of which used to be Anglicans). However, the general practice of the West is to only ordain celibate men to the priesthood. This could change one day or could continue to stay the same.Secretary of State of the Vatican says that priestly celibacy is up for discussion does this mean that Married priests are on the horizon?
I am confused.
This is a lesson in why never to get catholic news from secular headlines.Secretary of State of the Vatican says that priestly celibacy is up for discussion does this mean that Married priests are on the horizon?
I am confused.
I would say this is debatable. “Good results” yes, I agree with that. “Nothing but good results”…That I’m not so sure about.The Church at any time could get rid of the celibacy rule, but I highly doubt it would. Celibacy has given us nothing but good results.
As others have pointed out priestly celibacy is a discipline, not a doctrine, and like all disciplines they can be changed.Secretary of State of the Vatican says that priestly celibacy is up for discussion does this mean that Married priests are on the horizon?
I am confused.
There is a common misconception that allowing married priests would solve the “priest shortage.” But the problem is: God calls plenty of men to the celibate priesthood. Most men reject the priesthood because of the commitment of proclaiming the Gospel, not because of celibacy. You don’t see very many Latin Catholics flocking to become married Byzantine priests.I would say this is debatable. “Good results” yes, I agree with that. “Nothing but good results”…That I’m not so sure about.
For instance, a married priesthood would provide a larger pool of candidates and the current problem of the “priest shortage” might have been avoided.
Co-incidentally to this - the larger pool of potential candidates might have allowed diocese to more readily remove certain priests from work that was unsuitable for them - and for the health of the Church.
So this one possible area where the celibate priesthood returned a less than positive result.
Just a thought
Peace
James