N
nodito
Guest
More of an impossibility than a problem since, you know, the goddess Isida is not real.Would it a problem for the demon of goddess Isida, for example, to call herself this way?
More of an impossibility than a problem since, you know, the goddess Isida is not real.Would it a problem for the demon of goddess Isida, for example, to call herself this way?
No, the exorcists prays because demons hate the sound of prayers and must flee.What’s more, don’t Catholic exorcists force demons of demoniacs to pray to God and Mary in order to humiliate them?
The Blessed Virgin acknowledges her Son in the very reason for appearing which is to lead people to Him.“This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.” (1 John 4:2-3) Does Mary from apparitions pass this test?
Loving and honouring your Father and Mother is a commandment.By the way, am I not Jesus’ brother if I keep His commandments (Mark 3:35)? Isn’t it some kind of ‘new gospel’ preached by the spirit of Fatima?
Authentic apparitions have led many to faith. And the Rosary has been preached which has led many to and kept many in the faith. If individuals have doubts then that is down to the individual to reconcile. Do you know anything about Lourdes?In my view, there is signifacant difference between Saul’s vision and marian apparitions. The first clearly led to Christ, while considering the second one might have some doubts.
Protestants are not a good example because they believe in ‘Sola Scriptura’.If marian apparitions really lead people to Jesus, I think protestants wouldn’t have any problem with them, as they do not have problem with Saul’s vision.
The apparitions by Our Lady recognised in Mexico (Guadeloupe) converted millions to the Church! And many of these people were, before their conversion, making human sacrifices (which they stopped doing, after their conversion).Please forgive me, I’ll just give a thought. Ancient people used to burn their children as sacrifices for Baal, because it worked.
At Lourdes and Fatima (I think), she had her head bent in reverence to God, and she was following the Rosary beads in her hand, interceding for the children and the world, as they prayed.As you said earlier in your post - Satan is father of lies. He has no problem with mixing truth with false, it’s an old trick from the garden of Eden. And to whom Mary from apparitions encourages people to pray? Not to herself only?
Since such thoughts did not occur on the face of this earth until 1500s Europe, why not doubt them first? Since the greatest division and pulverization of the Body of Christ did not occur until 1500s Europe, why not doubt that first? You are assuming that a new, Euro-centric, revolutionary, disagreeing and divisive “gospel” is true. Why not test the spirits that are leading you first? They have lead you into division.In my view, there is signifacant difference…
You are aligned perfectly with atheists here. All apparitions lead to Christ, as Mary always and everywhere leads to Christ. They lead to the denial of self, the offering of prayer and works of charity. That seem like the devil to you? If so, was Jesus lying, and a house divided really can stand?Please forgive me, I’ll just give a thought. Ancient people used to burn their children as sacrifices for Baal, because it worked.
It does seem interesting to me the division in our Protestant brothers and sisters but they continuously fail to see this single point, only the Catholic Church has been there from the beginning, has lasted through the centuries, and is not divided against itself. Yet the Christian encyclopedia lists over 30,000 different Christian religions!Since such thoughts did not occur on the face of this earth until 1500s Europe, why not doubt them first? Since the greatest division and pulverization of the Body of Christ did not occur until 1500s Europe, why not doubt that first? You are assuming that a new, Euro-centric, revolutionary, disagreeing and divisive “gospel” is true. Why not test the spirits that are leading you first? They have lead you into division.
You are aligned perfectly with atheists here. All apparitions lead to Christ, as Mary always and everywhere leads to Christ. They lead to the denial of self, the offering of prayer and works of charity. That seem like the devil to you? If so, was Jesus lying, and a house divided really can stand?
Points to ponder sincerely.