Questions about the Novus Ordo Mass.

  • Thread starter Thread starter paul11b
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
agnes_therese said:
Oh, dear. Hon, there’s enough real trouble in the world without looking for made-up trouble!
Click to expand...
Thousands and thousands of research is not made up. Some did come up false I found but the ones that are truth, people need to know. Research! God Bless U!
 
CatholicGeek1 said:
To this I would say that this is most likely a difference in translation. What a lot of people do not realize that the only Biblical texts that are guaranteed to be free from error are the originals. The translations do not have this protection, that is why there are different translations and we do come up with better and more accurate translations over time.
Click to expand...
👍👍👍
Southern said:
The original that we have today is the only one we have. The Douley Rhimes Version. Look at the Copyrite date dating back to the 400’s. It was translated and written by the Monks on sheep skin scrolls then they in turn put them in to the book form.
Click to expand...
No. Council of Trent protected only the Latin version, Clementine at the time. This was a correction of all the inconsistencies caused by poor handwriting and skipped or added texts. Going forward from Trent, the Gutenberg press protected the Clementine version.

Yes, the Latin version is translated but as the Greek version, many of the books were translated by Jerome from the Hebrew or Aramaic. Even the Greek Vulgate has some problematic translations.
 
Southern said:
Yes I understand them. Not all say the exact thing. That was just an example. Some things are longer some are shorter.
Click to expand...
But you were saying that the Gospel had been changed for the Vigil.You said that Scripture had been changed. I am pointing out that the Gospels (plural) say different things, and what you might see as a change with possibly a hidden motive, is simply a difference inherent in scripture. There is no conspiracy.
 
paperwight66 said:
But you were saying that the Gospel had been changed for the Vigil.You said that Scripture had been changed. I am pointing out that the Gospels (plural) say different things, and what you might see as a change with possibly a hidden motive, is simply a difference inherent in scripture. There is no conspiracy.
Click to expand...
I understand It was just an example not a conspiracy. People can say different things but mean the same things. You are very correct that there is no protection on the translations. I agree!
 
Thread closed pending review by moderator Thomas Casey.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top