Questions about traditionalism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Junebug999
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Junebug999

Guest
Okay, I have questions:

WITHOUT starting a debate, would someone explain the spx…movement by excommunicated why, i think it relates to traditionalism, but not sure

is there a movement to go back to things before V2?

how do i find a traditional service in my area?

how do i find a latin service in my area?

how does one influence a parish back towards more traditionalism? is that up to the priest? or is that up to the bishop?

and when you talk about NO, what is that about? i know tlm means the latin massi, but i don’t understand NO

and why is there the difference between on the tongue or in the hand?
 
Okay, I have questions:

WITHOUT starting a debate, would someone explain the spx…movement by excommunicated why, i think it relates to traditionalism, but not sure

is there a movement to go back to things before V2?

how do i find a traditional service in my area?

how do i find a latin service in my area?

how does one influence a parish back towards more traditionalism? is that up to the priest? or is that up to the bishop?

and when you talk about NO, what is that about? i know tlm means the latin massi, but i don’t understand NO

and why is there the difference between on the tongue or in the hand?
The SSPX bishops were excommunicated because they consecrated some bishops without the approval of Rome.

Yes, Pope Benedict XVI is working to eliminate the misinterpretations of the Second Vatican Council.

Currently, these organizations promoting traditional practices exist:

fssp.org/en/index.htm

institute-christ-king.org/home/

opusdei.us/

To find an approved Latin Mass in your area, go to:

web2.iadfw.net/carlsch/MaterDei/churches.htm

People on these forums use the abbreviation, “NO,” for “Novus Ordo Missae” — “the new Ordinary of the Mass” - the Mass of Pope Paul VI after Vatican II.

Communion on the hand was an indult (permission) granted after Vatican II, but the norm was Communion on the tongue with a paten underneath so that the Host doesn’t fall on the ground.

Without taking anything away from the other [form], [Communion on the tongue] better highlights the truth of the real presence in the Eucharist, helps the devotion of the faithful, and introduces more easily the sense of mystery. Aspects which, in our times, pastorally speaking, it is urgent to highlight and recover."

zenit.org/article-23028?l=english
 
thank you for your response -=- i learned a lot and have already found a local LM to attend. Thank you very much!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top