Quick question

[AnthonySorensen]

There was recently a thread against gay marriage. (I know there are countless threads on this topic.) Somebody in the thread was asking for secular reasons against gay marriage and someone posted a link to something like 75 non religious reasons against gay marriage. I can’t find that original thread.

I can’t find anything similiar in a google search. Does anyone have anything similiar or maybe I’m not searching correctly. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

 

[AnthonySorensen]

Actually I just found it. It was 77 reasons to support man and woman marriage.

Sorry.

 

[Linusthe2nd]

There was recently a thread against gay marriage. (I know there are countless threads on this topic.) Somebody in the thread was asking for secular reasons against gay marriage and someone posted a link to something like 75 non religious reasons against gay marriage. I can’t find that original thread.

I can’t find anything similiar in a google search. Does anyone have anything similiar or maybe I’m not searching correctly. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Here’s one you may not have seen. Why should society support these lazy drones? Do you realize they will become eligible for all spousal benefits currently availible only to the surviving spouce of in a heterosexual marriage? Nothing but drones, a drag on society.

 

[Jala]

Here’s one you may not have seen. Why should society support these lazy drones? Do you realize they will become eligible for all spousal benefits currently availible only to the surviving spouce of in a heterosexual marriage? Nothing but drones, a drag on society.

Are you saying that a surviving spouse receiving benefits is a “drag on society?” Pompous, arrogant, entitled attitude.

Jala

 

[silenced]

" . . . Here’s one you may not have seen. Why should society support these lazy drones? Do you realize they will become eligible for all spousal benefits currently availible only to the surviving spouce of in a heterosexual marriage? Nothing but drones, a drag on society."

Wow. Is this a blanket indictment against gay people? “All gay people are lazy”? “Gay people should have no entitlements”?

Are you threatened by gay people? Is this what Catholicism has come to?

Wow.

 

[XRU]

Here’s one you may not have seen. Why should society support these lazy drones? Do you realize they will become eligible for all spousal benefits currently availible only to the surviving spouce of in a heterosexual marriage? Nothing but drones, a drag on society.

Ah . . . you are joking right? Come on. Right? BTW, check your spelling. Yes I am a spelling Nazi.

 

[silenced]

The “77 Reasons” list you were looking for was not labeled as a list with an anti-gay agenda, it was a list with a pro-hetero agenda. You misrepresented the thing you were looking for. Jeez, hope you weren’t too disappointed.

 

[Linusthe2nd]

Are you saying that a surviving spouse receiving benefits is a “drag on society?” Pompous, arrogant, entitled attitude.

Jala

Perhaps I said it badly. I was referring to surviving spouces who were of the same sex as the deceased spouce. These are drones. Deceased spouces of heterosexual marriages are the only proper beneficieries of benefits.

 

[Aboveallbereal]

Gay marriage is a contradiction is terms and the best argument against any contradiction in terms is that it is…a contradiction in terms.

 

[AnthonySorensen]

The “77 Reasons” list you were looking for was not labeled as a list with an anti-gay agenda, it was a list with a pro-hetero agenda. You misrepresented the thing you were looking for. Jeez, hope you weren’t too disappointed.

Pro hetero is anti gay. I didn’t misrepresent anything.

 

[lllj]

Here’s one you may not have seen. Why should society support these lazy drones? Do you realize they will become eligible for all spousal benefits currently availible only to the surviving spouce of in a heterosexual marriage? Nothing but drones, a drag on society.

Um… excuse me?

That’s the least convincing argument I’ve ever seen. I was hoping you were a troll, but you have too many posts for that.