C
CzechMan
Guest
Still, 1 Tim. 2:8 is a commandment to men only, on how they need to pray, raising their holy hands without anger or quarreling. For women, this is not commanded.
From my Pentecostal perspective . . . sure. LOL.How about people raising their hands while spinning around? If that helps people pray better, should it be allowed (e.g. at Catholic Mass).
I think an argument would be that unlike spinning around, lifting hands has ancient and scriptural precedent.Where does it stop?
And if I can define my own Catholic Liturgy, then can I also define my own Catholic Catechism?
That’s not quite accurate. There are some rubrics that direct the laity, but not that many, and they don’t preclude (for instance) a parent tending to their children. There’s no sin if I don’t speak the responses. The laity are not under dictate for rigidity.Everything the laity says, or the moves we make are defined.
Yes, I’m very concerned about “distractions” - that’s a main peeve of mine.
So who is it that gains the most when the distractions occur? Why is it that cell phones seem to ring right at the Consecration as the priest says in persona Christi “This is my Body.” Satan is an expert of distraction.
Oh…except that there is usually that major Mass distraction called “the need to have constant non-stop music/singing/etc.”
I understand that you are very disturbed by distractions, but they are a part of life. We cannot avoid all distraction during worship. My parish is situated on a busy corner and we are constantly having to deal with the sounds of traffic, particularly the sirens of emergency vehicles. Today I dealt with the distraction of one of the icons on the wall not being level. Yes, it was seriously distracting me. Much more than I should have allowed. Then I noticed that somebody had brought a leaf inside and torn it up and left the pieces all over. (I hope it wasn’t one of my kids. It could have been, but I don’t think it was this time.) Then I noticed that the ribbons on one of the books were fraying. And don’t even get me started on the distractions of my own kids. (Other people’s kids don’t generally distract me.) Anyway, my point is that we have to just learn to refocus when we are momentarily distracted by something beyond our control. We cannot reasonably expect a distraction-free environment, even in Mass. I would even argue that our ability to learn to pray and deal with distractions charitably can be an important part of our own path to holiness.What a distraction.
There is no directive from the Church that children are to be taken to the crying room (if available).I think the laity have been directed to take their children to the crying room (if available),
That is not in the rubrics, it was brought in from Charismatic circles.When we say “and with your spirit” some people lift up their hands.
When we say “we lift them up to the Lord” then “it is right and just” a lot of people lift up their hands.
Of course we cannot avoid all distractions during worship. But some distractions (ambulance sirens, etc) cannot be avoided. Some distractions can be prevented through common sense and consideration of others.We cannot avoid all distraction during worship.
Yes, of course it can be an important part of our path to holiness. Just as increasing our resistance to temptation is part of that path. Would you recommend that we provide more opportunities for temptation because overcoming it can lead to more holiness?We cannot reasonably expect a distraction-free environment, even in Mass. I would even argue that our ability to learn to pray and deal with distractions charitably can be an important part of our own path to holiness.
Of course there are such directives. All the parishes I’ve attended have implemented some form of directives e.g. to ushers that when they see some form of commotion, they should move forward and ask those responsible to leave or go to the crying room (if applicable). Do you claim that your parish is somehow prevented from issuing such a directive?There is no directive from the Church that children are to be taken to the crying room (if available).
Of course. But we cannot control the behavior of others. Some people are more distractable than others and what distracts you might not even be a blip on the radar for me. The best we can do is learn to deal with inevitable distractions with grace and forgiveness (if such is necessary).Some distractions can be prevented through common sense and consideration of others.
No, I think we have to deal with quite enough opportunities for temptation without having to seek them out!Would you recommend that we provide more opportunities for temptation because overcoming it can lead to more holiness?
Ah, I misunderstood you. I thought you meant that there was some sort of church-wide directive that children belong in the cry room. As far as moving outside or to a cry room when some sort of commotion happens, that is common sense and common courtesy. But even if a person does that, it takes time and the distracting event has already occurred. The damage is already done. It would seem that such a directive is either not present or not enforced in many parishes, given the number of complaints on CAF regarding noisy children.Of course there are such directives. All the parishes I’ve attended have implemented some form of directives e.g. to ushers that when they see some form of commotion, they should move forward and ask those responsible to leave or go to the crying room (if applicable).
My parish is a bit unusual. We are not prevented, but there really has been no need to issue such directives. We are a very small parish and function as more of an extended family. We have a high level of tolerance for each other’s quirks. I suppose if there were an ongoing problem, our priest would address it with the individuals involved or make suggestions to the parish as a whole. It would not come down as a directive.Do you claim that your parish is somehow prevented from issuing such a directive?
Ours isn’t prevented from issuing a directive, but ours has enough sense that this is no way to treat people. They are allowed to self “police” on these matters.Do you claim that your parish is somehow prevented from issuing such a directive?