P
poche
Guest
I think it is a good idea for him to cast a wide net. You never know where or your next parish priest of 15 or 20 years in the future will come from.
The bishops upon whose authority the rules depend don’t seem to agree with you . . .So I guess I could see how one could make the argument for liquid wax but I think it is a stretch and goes against the spirit of the rule.
I know that in our parish not much thought or research was involved when we went from wax to oil. “Yes, let’s get these, they won’t drip and it’ll be cheaper” is as deep as it went. Same applied to the processional cross, purchased at the same time, that had a Risen Christ on it. That part of the cross was removable so they purchased another part with an actual crucifix, but they still insist on switching to the Risen Christ during the Easter season.CatholicSooner:![]()
The bishops upon whose authority the rules depend don’t seem to agree with you . . .So I guess I could see how one could make the argument for liquid wax but I think it is a stretch and goes against the spirit of the rule.
Returning to the original question, it really depends on what he wants to do. How many altar servers (or indeed none at all) is entirely a matter for him as is his choice of which preface/Eucharistic Prayer to use. In some things, flexibility is needed based on the circumstances in which mass is being celebrated but there are limits of course dictated, not just by liturgical law but also by common sense!i’m also of the opinion that a priest shouldn’t have a lot of freedom in making changes to the mass. How much freedom is a priest allowed?