Ration Mind/Immortal Soul

  • Thread starter Thread starter JaKael02
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church says God created the human soul. Check this link:
scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s2c1p6.htm#382

Specifically this one:

God bless,
Ut
I am fully aware of it (CCC 366). Creation may also be perceived as emergence of the soul from God’s being. Yes, it is immediate at the time of our coming into being and I perceive that the soul was an integral part of God’s being prior to that instant.
 
So concluding, if you subscribe to evolution, our neighboring species (Neanderthal, Homo Erectus, etc.) are not going to have an immortal soul; but rather treated as an animal species. Correct me if I’m wrong here.

Thanks
They interbred with homo sapiens, and built ships, fires, and buried their dead.
IMHO they are theologically human and descended from Adam.
 
The soul being preexisting in God only makes since if you adhere to the error of Cartesian dualism and believe the soul is a ghost in the machine. The soul is the form of man.
 
If you say the soul is finite, which it is , and it pre-existed in God then the soul had no beginning because it shared God nature which is Existence, nothing finite could possibly exist eternally, it is a contradiction God does sustain what He creates, but it remain finite, not infinite, any infinity applied to a creature is one of accident, not one of essence. In other words God sustains the soul in existence, the soul can not exist on its own. The soul necessarily has a beginning, if it didn’t that would mean that the soul has existence for its nature, and it doesn’t Apower of the soul is its ability to know itself, I know that I know. If the soul existed always even in God, it would know it. Human experience shows no evidence of this phenominon. God is not subject to time, but created it (Potency and Act) Pre-existence is a human concept applied to God, in God there is no Potency, but pure Act.
The soul’s pre-existence is as an integral part of the infinite God and NOT as another finite being. After emerging from God it exists as another finite being
 
My understanding is that everything that is non-God is created.

That would include our souls/minds.

It includes as well our natural bodies, of course, the difference being that while our human bodies were grown via the biological cycle, our souls were made for the bodies at the moment of conception.

ICXC NIKA
 
My understanding is that everything that is non-God is created.

That would include our souls/minds.

It includes as well our natural bodies, of course, the difference being that while our human bodies were grown via the biological cycle, our souls were made for the bodies at the moment of conception.

ICXC NIKA
But my understanding is somewhat different, thanks to the powerful oral tradition of my land and the uniqueness of my language (Tamil) in which a bit of philosophy / theology is part of grammar and this is what we learn in Tamil grammar: Everything in the three realms, Heaven (விண்ணுலகம்), Created Universe (மண்ணுலகம்) and the Netherworld (பாதாளம்), is classified as higher and lower based on the ability to reason (Nannool:261). The higher class (உயர்திணை) is comprised of beings with reasoning power ―God, angels, demons, humans and the lower class (அஃறிணை) includes all other living and non-living with no reasoning power.

In Indian philosophy, the above classification becomes imperishable and perishable and hence the two axioms: ‘that which has a beginning also has an end’ and ‘that which is imperishable has no beginning’. God alone is infinite and independent with no beginning or end. He suffers no loss or mutation in giving His own Spirit for begetting other spiritual beings who are all fully dependent and trace their origin to God in Whom they always pre-existed. The phrases independent God and reasoning power are respectively used in the same sense in which Abrahamic religions use almighty God and free-will.
 
I am fully aware of it (CCC 366). Creation may also be perceived as emergence of the soul from God’s being. Yes, it is immediate at the time of our coming into being and I perceive that the soul was an integral part of God’s being prior to that instant.
The Catholic church does not hold this teaching. See Vatican I:

ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/V1.htm#5
  1. If anyone says that finite things, both corporal and spiritual, or at any rate, spiritual, emanated from the divine substance; or that the divine essence, by the manifestation and evolution of itself becomes all things or, finally, that God is a universal or indefinite being which by self determination establishes the totality of things distinct in genera, species and individuals: let him be anathema.
  1. If anyone does not confess that the world and all things which are contained in it, both spiritual and material, were produced, according to their whole substance, out of nothing by God; or holds that God did not create by his will free from all necessity, but as necessarily as he necessarily loves himself; or denies that the world was created for the glory of God: let him be anathema.
God bless,
Ut
 
The soul’s pre-existence is as an integral part of the infinite God and NOT as another finite being. After emerging from God it exists as another finite being
utunumsint’s recent post shows that it is a teaching of the Church that the soul was created by God, and did not emerge from God or pre-exist in God.

I would further comment: There seems to be no reason to take the Genesis account of God’s “breathing” our souls into us as implying that our souls were previously existent or previously parts of God. What we exhale was not part of us!

I am not sure in what sense you mean that our souls were “integral parts” of God. If you mean that our souls are literally proper parts of God, then that would contradict divine simplicity (ie. that God is not composed of any parts, potentialities, etc.), which is also a teaching of the Church.
 
God is Pure Being, God is the I am who Am , In God we have our being, yet we are not part of God, that would be Pantheism. God is simple, He gives existence to all things. God is His attributes. He is love, He is beauty, He is truth, He is Goodness, He is subsistent. He is intelligence. When we speak of God, we must speak of Him existentially, in other words, not what His is, but that He is. We are totally dependent, totally finite, totally created, had a beginning, Act and Potency, essence and existence, matter and form make up what we are, created God is Existence,Pure Act Existence is GIVEN to us, we are not part of God
God lets us share His divine life by divine grace, the work of the Holy Spirit, continually supplying our greatest need, the need for Himself. It’s all a gift of love.
 
I would further comment: There seems to be no reason to take the Genesis account of God’s “breathing” our souls into us as implying that our souls were previously existent or previously parts of God. What we exhale was not part of us!
Actually, the CO2 and water vapor in our breathing contains carbon and hydrogen that were once in biological molecules in our bodies.

However, in the realm of spirit, that would not apply.

ICXC NIKA.
 
God is Pure Being, God is the I am who Am , In God we have our being, yet we are not part of God, that would be Pantheism. God is simple, He gives existence to all things. God is His attributes. He is love, He is beauty, He is truth, He is Goodness, He is subsistent. He is intelligence. When we speak of God, we must speak of Him existentially, in other words, not what His is, but that He is. We are totally dependent, totally finite, totally created, had a beginning, Act and Potency, essence and existence, matter and form make up what we are, created God is Existence,Pure Act Existence is GIVEN to us, we are not part of God
God lets us share His divine life by divine grace, the work of the Holy Spirit, continually supplying our greatest need, the need for Himself. It’s all a gift of love.
Thank Ynotzap; I stand corrected.
 
Can someone, (briefly), explain the connection between a rational mind and having an immortal soul.

For example: Animals do not have a rational mind, therefore are not immortal. Humans have a rational mind, and are immortal.

I’m speaking simple as possible here without any technical language. Anybody know the connection here? I couldn’t find anything on google.

Thanks,
James
Why rationality should entail eternality?
 
To me intellect is responsible for rational thinking and many other functioning that we share with animals. I however think that we share the same intellect. The difference in us however arises from the fact that we have different body since that is body which feeds intellect. For example communication is very central part in developing our rational thinking done by intellect which animal lack. People with specific disability behaves exactly like animal which again shows that what is bring intellect from potentiality, what it can do, to action is the body.
 
To me intellect is responsible for rational thinking and many other functioning that we share with animals. I however think that we share the same intellect. The difference in us however arises from the fact that we have different body since that is body which feeds intellect. For example communication is very central part in developing our rational thinking done by intellect which animal lack. People with specific disability behaves exactly like animal which again shows that what is bring intellect from potentiality, what it can do, to action is the body.
Well, yeah, our mind needs the human head to reside in; and while we live life within our minds, it is the body that in fact lives the life!

ICXC NIKA
 
These are great responses and exactly the short, quick answer(s) I was looking for. You guys are sharp!

So concluding, if you subscribe to evolution, our neighboring species (Neanderthal, Homo Erectus, etc.) are not going to have an immortal soul; but rather treated as an animal species. Correct me if I’m wrong here.

Thanks
Christians have no obligation to construct our view of human nature around the scientific concept of “species” as applied by paleontologists to ancient humans.

In other words, the fact that scientists call Neanderthals and “Homo Erectus” different species (and Neanderthals have sometimes been classified as a subspecies of our species, anyway) doesn’t resolve the question of whether they had rational souls.

Edwin
 
The idea that a human can evolve, or does evolve from animal is erroneous because when the object under investigation is clearly defined as an animal, lacking a rational soul, not capable of communicating intelligently, ( not instinctively as animals do, they have sense memory, and show a definite program pattern) for one simple truth" Animals can’t give what the don’t have.
People confuse the intelligent patterns animals follow as “human intelligence”, the ability to rationalize. Yes animals do smart things because they were programed to do it,by the “Master Programer” not due to being a rational , autonomous, entity. Of course when some in the world do not acknowledge God, and try to understand reality, they are at a loss. I am afraid many empirical scientists resort to imagination for answers People tend to humanize animals. Once an animal, always an animal. Once a human, always a human. A human can act like an animal when his reason is not in control, and allows his feeling to dictate his course of action. We humans are a combination of “animality and rationality” homo sapiens, knowing man. We know that we know. We can program animals, and brain wash humans, and I am afraid that is what is happening in the world.
 
Animals do not have the potency ( the real capacity for reasoning) to act (to the actual reasoning) if they did they could communicate intelligently. When did we ever have a good intelligent conversation with our pet, after all it’s ancestors have been around a long, long time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top